American Masters: Season 22, Episode 4

You Must Remember This: The Warner Bros. Story (23 Sep. 2008)

TV Episode  |   |  Documentary, Biography, History
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.2/10 from 171 users  
Reviews: 7 user | 1 critic

Add a Plot


0Check in

On Disc

at Amazon

10 Best Back-to-School TV Shows

Dust off your varsity jacket and get excited for fall with our list of the 10 best back-to-school TV shows.

Visit our Family Entertainment Guide

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1043 titles
created 07 Jul 2011
list image
a list of 26 titles
created 24 Jul 2012
a list of 64 titles
created 23 Sep 2013
a list of 206 titles
created 25 May 2014
a list of 265 titles
created 3 months ago

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: You Must Remember This: The Warner Bros. Story (23 Sep 2008)

You Must Remember This: The Warner Bros. Story (23 Sep 2008) on IMDb 8.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of American Masters.
« Previous Episode | 144 of 192 Episodes | Next Episode »


Episode credited cast:
Himself - Narrator
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Benjamin Disraeli / Montgomery Royle
Herself - Interviewee
Don Jose de Marana / Don Juan de Marana
Jeanine Basinger ...
Herself - Interviewee
Julian Marsh
Himself - Interviewee
Himself - Interviewee
Himself - Interviewee
Himself - Interviewee (archive footage)
Eugenie Besserer ...
Sara Rabinowitz
Himself (archive footage)
Himself - Interviewee


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis





Release Date:

23 September 2008 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs




See  »

Did You Know?


The four parts of the longer version were: "You Ain't Heard Nothin' Yet (1923-1935)"; "Good War, Uneasy Peace (1935-1950)"; "Age of Anxiety: 1950-1969"; and "Starting Over: 1970-1990." See more »


Features Them! (1954) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Boring and VERY Badly Edited
24 September 2008 | by (Texas) – See all my reviews

While I have enjoyed many of Richard Schickel's previous shows, this one is really pretty much a waste of time. The writing is very boring and pedantic. Watching the show is like sitting through a particularly boring lecture in a college class you really want to enjoy. There isn't a coherent thread of storytelling and it seems to bounce between one topic to the next with little or no transition. I can't tell what the purpose of this documentary is supposed to be... is it about the stars and directors? Is it about the style and themes of the films? Is it about the history of the studio in relation to the world it is in? Is it about everything that happened at WB within specific periods of time? I can't tell what Schickel is trying to get me to take away from this documentary. It is like he has an outline and checklist of things he 'has' to cover and is just going along "Rin Tin Tin... check, The Jazz Singer... check". Where is his passion for his subject?

Clint Eastwood's narration does not pull me into the story he is telling, but then how excited can he be reading the script he was given? The interviews are mostly uninteresting and seem to be a mix of old stuff from Schickel's Men Who Made The Movies series and dropped in to remind us who he has talked to before (and maybe to save him the trouble of doing new work) and talking to critics and academics who we don't know or care about who seem more interested in impressing Schieckel than us, the audience. The camera work on the interviews could have been done by any junior high kid with a tripod and the work of the interviewer does not bring out great storytelling from the interviewees.

Another thing which is bad about this show is the editing... usually very well done in Schickel's documentaries. Some segments show the old magic... like the James Cagney and Busby Berkely segments... which do what the segments should do... make us, the audience, interested enough in the subjects that we want to get the movies we learn about. However, such segments stand out because of how bad he rest of the editing is. I have worked as a projectionist for three decades and know that anyone can cut frames, but editing is more than that. Most of the transitions between shots are very abrupt and look like one shot is dropped down before the end of the previous shot. In addition, the movies we all know are represented by the clichéd clips that we have all seen a thousand times... can he not find anything new to give us about Casablanca and Yankee Doodle Dandy, for example... and not only are all of the clips from those shows the 'usual suspects' he spends way too much time on them rather than spending the time on what we HAVEN"T seen and heard before.

I don't know how much Warner Brothers paid for this hack job, but it was too much and if I am expected to want to buy the DVD to watch this show more than once, sorry... once is more than enough. Maybe it is time for Schickel to call it quits and retire because he sure doesn't seem to have anything worth while to give to the public. I'm sure USC would allow him to give really boring lectures to film students and play his 'greatest hits' to them to show them how wonderful he is.

If you don't get it from my review... I cannot, in good conscience, recommend this documentary to anyone. Jeez, how does ANYONE make the Warner Brothers story a snoozefest? P.S. -- Even before the show starts, you know to expect something bad... the title card of the first part tells us it covers '1929 - 1941' and yet the shows goes back to the teen's and covers films into the 50s. Does Schickel not even know what his show is about or how to use a calendar?

12 of 16 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Where can I find this? Hkykix38
None Without Sin jumpinjosh49
A Duke Named Ellington DVD marlisda
Who was the narrator on the Gershwin documentary??? richmond-4
Atlantic Records PACman66

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: