After wealthy philanthropist Piers Pomfrey has expressed an unusual interest in a ring found by her niece Annabelle, Miss Fritton explains that she is descended from a pirate who, in 1598, stole treasure from another pirate: Pomfrey's ancestor. The location of the treasure is to be found when the ring and its double are put together. Felonious ex-pupil Kelly and Miss Fritton's former lover Geoffrey are brought in to help the school steal the second ring from the evil Pomfrey's misogynistic secret society, leading to a showdown at the Globe Theater, and an amazing revelation as to the identity of pirate Captain Fritton, as well as that of William Shakespeare. Written by
don @ minifie-1
This is the second time that both David Tennant( Sir Piers Pomfrey) and Talulah Riley(Annabelle Fritton) have worked together. Talulah guest starred in Doctor Who during David Tennant's time as The Doctor. The episode was a two episode story 'Silence in the Library and The Forest of the Dead' during the fourth season of Doctor Who. See more »
When the girls are overlooking the river from outside the Globe theatre, watching Lord Pomfrey escaping in his launch, Juno Temple's character licks her finger and holds it up (in order to determine wind speed/direction) but when they steal Drakes ship and it's cruising down the river, none of the sails are unfurled, and the ship is moving using it's engine(s). See more »
Hah! In your face! In your face! Face of a supermodel. Brain of a super noodle.
Lucy! Do you really think I look like a supermodel?
See more »
Performed by Sarah Harding
Written by Miranda Cooper (as Cooper), Brian Higgins (as Higgins), Carla Marie Williams (as Williams), Eliza Dodd-Noble (as Noble), Florrie Arnold (as Arnold) and Fred Falke (as Falke)
Published by Xenomania / Warner / Chappell Music Publishing Ltd
Courtesy of Fascination Records / Polydor UK
Under license from Universal Music Operations Ltd. See more »
I am not going to lie and say this sequel is a masterpiece because it isn't for me. But I don't consider it a bad film, in fact I thought it was pretty entertaining. Comparing it to the first film, which I also liked even with its faults, I haven't completely made up my mind which I prefer, as both had their good and bad points that were either improved upon or diminished.
In terms, I'd say the sequel had the more eventful plot, that said there were occasions where there was too much going on, and both films admittedly had episodic story structures with some entertaining parts. While I liked the acting on the whole, two performances weren't quite there. One was Gemma Arterton, now I am not dismissing her as a bad actress because she isn't-see her in Tess of the D'Urbevilles she is brilliant there- it's just that she doesn't have much to do this time around. The other is I agree Sarah Harding, she looked pretty but her acting and facial expressions I felt were all wrong and to me her presence felt pointless.
In terms of scripting, there are some fun lines(this is interminable), as well as some very silly ones(Seriously, she'd snog a melon if you drew a mouth on it). There were also some good scenes(and plenty of anarchy between the schoolgirls), such as the one at the boy's school(my brother was an extra in this scene), the ruination of Romeo and Juliet, the sword fight between Geoffrey and Romeo and the search for the ring in the dark. The two scenes that didn't quite work so well were the ending, which felt rather abrupt, and the part where Annabelle is in the school infirmary in exorcist fashion, which came across as a little too silly for my taste.
St Trinians 2 is nice to look at, it isn't high art, but the buildings are imposing and it was nice to see London again. The music is delightful, and the direction is decent. Apart from Harding and Arterton to a lesser degree, the other performances are fine. Rupert Everett is a lot of fun to watch, while Colin Firth has more to do this time around and is wonderful. Tululah Riley gives a nice account of herself as well, as does Toby Jones, while David Tennant makes for an excellent if somewhat hammy villain of the piece.
Overall, no masterpiece but it was at least watchable. It keeps reasonably to the somewhat chaotic tone of the first film, and while the plot was a little busy in places and there were moments of stale laughs or acting, I enjoyed it. 6/10 Bethany Cox
10 of 11 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?