MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 504 this week

Dead Noon (Video 2007)

2.4
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 2.4/10 from 204 users  
Reviews: 8 user | 6 critic

With the powers of hell at his disposal, Frank, a blood-thirsty outlaw from the old west, is resurrected to seek his revenge on the present day town of Weston.

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 2654 titles created 11 months ago
 
a list of 122 titles created 22 Feb 2012
 
a list of 300 titles created 9 months ago
 
a list of 160 titles created 11 Oct 2011
 
a list of 265 titles created 3 weeks ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Dead Noon (Video 2007)

Dead Noon (Video 2007) on IMDb 2.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Dead Noon.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
Undead Cowboy
...
Frank
Robert Milo Andrus ...
Stuart
...
Grace
Dixon Phillips ...
Logan (as Scott Phillips)
...
Louise
...
Kane
Keith Suta ...
Ben
Kelsey McCann ...
Amy Kane
Andrew Wiest ...
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Ed Bosco ...
Stoner 2
Cara Finch ...
Make-out Girl
Jordan Jansen-Mecca ...
Dream Child
Jen Kelsey ...
Caley Gash
Nick Martin ...
Deputy Dumas
Edit

Storyline

In this shoot 'em up western horror tale, ancient demons, walking skeletons and cowboy zombies join forces to take the law down in a blaze of hellfire and brimstone. With the powers of hell at his disposal, Frank, a blood-thirsty outlaw from the old west, is resurrected to seek his revenge on the present day town of Weston. As the past collides with the present, Sheriff Logan Kane, his incompetent younger brother, Stuart, and sexy gun shop owner Grace will have to fight a posse of the undead to save the town and rescue Logan's new bride from a fate worse than death. Written by Ed Bosco

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

hell | cowboy | skeleton | demon | gunslinger | See more »

Taglines:

We Thought the West was Won

Genres:

Action | Horror | Western

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for violence | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

3 February 2009 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.66 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The original Dead Noon was made for $4,000. All of the scenes with Kane Hodder were added to Dead Noon after the movie was picked up by Barnholtz Entertainment. At that point, they took 20 minutes out of the original Dead Noon, then completely re-edited it and re-scored it. See more »

Connections

Spoofs High Noon (1952) See more »

Soundtracks

"They Called Me Evil"
Written and Performed by Kolvane
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Cool idea. . . just a complete failure.
15 June 2009 | by (Los Angeles, CA) – See all my reviews

An outlaw, Frank (Robert Bear), who has the power to unleash the evils of Hell at will, returns with a vengeance to take down the lawmen. The sheriff (Scott Phillips), his brother (Robert Milo Andrus), and the owner of the local gun shop (Lillith Fields), join forces in order to take down this psycho hellion and his legion of the demonic undead. Kane Hodder also makes an appearance as a zombie cowboy.

I must admit, with as few quality (and few in general) horror-westerns, I'm always on the lookout for a gem. There are really only a few worthy of a look (most notably Ravenous), but I'll always give a look to any that come along. I believe the one major problem with making a horror-western is the fact that it takes place in the past. To recreate the towns, the costumes, etc., it takes money, which is something low-budget filmmakers obviously don't have. And those that have the money don't want to risk it on a dead genre (westerns). Sadly, I'm almost always disappointed. . . and 'Dead Noon' does not break that streak. I'll start by speaking of the plot: It's not bad. Sure, it's a little ridiculous, but c'mon. . . a maniac outlaw looking to seek vengeance by bringing the powers of Hell to Earth with him? That's a pretty cool combination of evil there. But, other than that. . . it's just all pretty awful. To start, these characters were just ridiculously poorly done. I mean, we have this sheriff and an outlaw that, in their first gunfight, can't hit a target to save their lives (literally), even with the sheriff firing at least ten shots out of his six-shooter. What kind of 'maniac outlaw' can't hit a man standing still four eight feet in front of him and vice-versa? Also, speaking of this outlaw. . . is he supposed to be, at all, imposing? At, probably, 5'6", 140 lbs, I was less scared of him than I was of Cat R. Waul in 'Fievel Goes West'! And Fievel was a better (and more powerful, it would seem) hero than all of them combined in this flick! Moving past the characters (for sake of my sanity), let me give a word on the effects (oh no). I'm sorry, but, if you can't afford to do effects well. . . why even bother using them? The blood, the gore, the fire (ESPECIALLY the fire), etc., were so fake-looking, the viewer is completely removed from the reality of the film. If you can't make the fire real, do the burnings off-screen. We don't NEED to see it. I think if you show someone holding a torch, then turn away, then show a smouldering pile, the viewer will understand. And the blood? I don't really get why, when you have fake-looking blood effects as it is, there's a need to show them far more than necessary and even have it splatter on the camera (à la 'Sweeney Todd'). The fakeness is already ruining the mood, so why rub it in our faces (almost literally)? So, now on to the technical aspects. . . well, the writing's not completely awful, just really not good. The writers (it took three to write this, apparently) made no attempt whatsoever to keep any kind of real "1800s"-style to their dialogue and actions. It's no difficult: Just watch a few John Wayne flicks and take notes on key words & phrases. How about the look of the film? Well, the cinematography was pretty horrendous and the cheap shot-on-video look was a complete mess (use film or at least some kind of graining effect to make it look more 'old-fashioned'). Guess the only thing left is the acting? Well, it's not much to speak of. Some of the actors are okay, some are very bad, just like in most low-budget affairs. The main problem I had with the actors is the actual casting. . . none of them really looked "Old West" to me. But, oh well, it's forgivable with something this cheaply made and it's certainly the worst of the worries about this film. Overall, it's a very bad film. It shows some heart and had a LOT of potential with that plot, but due to obvious budgetary constraints and poor execution, it crashes & burns in some extremely fake-looking fire.

Final verdict: 3/10. I think I'm being generous, but they tried, so I'll give 'em that.

-AP3-


4 of 13 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Can't wait to see this! CelorElderOne
Things I learned from Dead Noon colinworthley
One of the Worst movies ive ever seen stalley316
Disgusting Excuse for a film rbugg91
Discuss Dead Noon (2007) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?