The film documents that remarkable concert and the politics around it. Boston Mayor Kevin White and his colleagues almost by accident realized that by televising the James Brown concert ...
See full summary »
The 89th Academy Awards telecast airs at 8:30 p.m. ET/5:30 p.m. PST, Sunday, Feb. 26, on ABC, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel. Join us for the first IMDb LIVE Viewing Party, a companion show that includes celebrity insight, real-time IMDb data, and more.
The film documents that remarkable concert and the politics around it. Boston Mayor Kevin White and his colleagues almost by accident realized that by televising the James Brown concert they could keep people indoors that night prevent widespread rioting. The film is almost testimony to the power of music in general and the power of James Brown's music in particular. The film is a tribute to the Godfather of Soul and the role he would come to play in working for civil rights. Written by
Good moment in history covered in first half but is happy to skim the surface too much and gets very general in second half
In the days following the assassination of Dr Martin Luther King, America's cities burnt with rage as riots and mass destruction of property broke out. On the 5th April 1968, James Brown was due to perform at the Garden a concert that the local authorities considered cancelling in case the bringing together of a large African American crowd in one place would cause trouble to break out. Instead the decision was taken to televise the concert for all to see, with the goal of not only keeping people in their homes but also giving the Mayor the opportunity to present a message of peace and unity. This documentary looks back at this moment in rock history, looking at the politics behind the scenes, the money issues and the various personalities involved.
At its core this is an interesting documentary by virtue of covering a small moment in music history that I wasn't aware of. The first 30-40 minutes of this film covers the situation in America, the bloodshed and violence that was occurring in response to King's murder and then moves to Boston where more of the same is expected. It then tells the story of how the James Brown concert not only kept people in their homes and distracted them from rioting but also shows how he was able to step in and stop something happening between the audience and the police who were in attendance at the Garden itself. While the title of the documentary is a proud boast perhaps, the substance in this section does rather back it up.
The remainder of the film goes on to look at the significance of Brown generally thereafter; who he threw his name behind politically, the power he had to influence the African American community and so on. This section is not as good because it seems like the makers felt they had to go beyond the "night" of the title but that they didn't really have the time or inclination to go deep with it so it feels more like a general rock tribute rather than giving us specific facts and exploring them. This also sort of happens in the first half too, but there are enough specifics in the story to prevent this in the telling at least but what is missing is discussion or debate around it. So some very obvious talking points are barely touched the most obvious being that Boston was a very racially segregated city and at the time the country was being violently split along racial lines, so was there any moral conflict in the Brown camp about the fact that his concert was essentially being used by the white man to control and subdue the black population? Was there an issue with the Mayor introducing the concert, thus making it seem even more this way? This topic is sort of mentioned once but it is never discussed and I didn't like how it was left out there. Once he is performing you can see Brown in charge and being the dominant personality but ultimately it is still a matter of the (white) system of government using music to distract a population from their understandable rage at that system and at very least the documentary should have addressed that.
There is plenty of footage from the show itself, which does pad the film out a bit but it pads it out in a good way I guess. It still should have either been a shorter film or a better film. If it had been shorter it would have been a tight focus on the night in question and not worried too much about beyond. Alternatively it could have been a bit longer but would have needed to be better; there are lots of issues it ignores and when it moves onto the cultural significance of James Brown in the wake of Boston, it gets very general and a little rambling.
Never as good a film as the title suggests, this is still a pretty enjoyable film because of the story at its core however as a documentary it isn't strong enough or well structured to really cut the mustard. Worth a look for the history in the first half, but beyond that it is weaker.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?