Although the characters portrayed are probably older than me, I could relate to aspects of combining nature, friendship, and fresh air that goes along with hiking anywhere. I am an outdoors-man and I knew I would like this movie like I did, simply because of the hiking, camping, and philosophical air. Of course, the actors made the movie even more enjoyable for me as I thought about past entertainments from this crown and began to remember how they made me laugh in the past and take life in strides and enjoy. I recommend watching this movie simply to inspire people to step out of their normal routines once in while, get a level set, and remember to enjoy life versus stress over it all of the time.
203 Reviews
Worth watching with yourself
awester26 January 2016
I really enjoyed this movie mixed of light comic touches and thought-provoking scenes. It's not a movie which wins over audience with dramatic turns and characterization. So I would recommend you to enjoy it alone or with someone who has similar patience as you. The story, as the name of the movie suggests, a walk in the wood, takes you for a causal walk into the nature. It leads you to look for the lost good qualities in human beings or make a good reflection on the past. This story is for me like a walk which makes me ponder over what adventures await in my future and how experience changes a person. There are a lot of interesting dialogues sparked with age-old memory and wisdom between these two characters: Katz and Bryson. They are grumpy, funny, and adorable. On top of that, the wood sceneries are gorgeous too.
Nice Fun!
namashi_19 February 2016
Based on the 1998 book/memoir of the same name by Bill Bryson, 'A Walk in the Woods' is a sweet, simple & uncomplicated film, that turns out to be nice fun. Its also supremely well-acted, although that barely comes as a surprise, since the performers on-screen are legends.
'A Walk in the Woods' Synopsis: After spending two decades in England, Bill Bryson returns to the U.S., where he decides the best way to connect with his homeland is to hike the Appalachian Trail with one of his oldest friends.
'A Walk in the Woods' is sweet look at age, adventure & friendship. Watching the senior protagonists go on a trip in the wilderness, offers moments of warmth & subtle humour. However, the film plays it safe at all times & hence it turns out be a good watch, but nothing memorable. Its harmless, but never remarkable.
Bill Holderman & Michael Arndt's Screenplay is nicely done. although its too simple in totality. Ken Kwapis's Direction is passable. Cinematography captures the wilderness well. Editing is sharp. Nathan Larson's Score is super.
Performance-Wise: Robert Redford & Nick Nolte are delightful. They create a fabulous on-screen camaraderie & carry the film on their ever-reliable shoulders. Emma Thompson shines in a brief role. Mary Steenburgen, however, is tiresomely typecast.
On the whole, 'A Walk in the Woods' is worth a watch.
'A Walk in the Woods' Synopsis: After spending two decades in England, Bill Bryson returns to the U.S., where he decides the best way to connect with his homeland is to hike the Appalachian Trail with one of his oldest friends.
'A Walk in the Woods' is sweet look at age, adventure & friendship. Watching the senior protagonists go on a trip in the wilderness, offers moments of warmth & subtle humour. However, the film plays it safe at all times & hence it turns out be a good watch, but nothing memorable. Its harmless, but never remarkable.
Bill Holderman & Michael Arndt's Screenplay is nicely done. although its too simple in totality. Ken Kwapis's Direction is passable. Cinematography captures the wilderness well. Editing is sharp. Nathan Larson's Score is super.
Performance-Wise: Robert Redford & Nick Nolte are delightful. They create a fabulous on-screen camaraderie & carry the film on their ever-reliable shoulders. Emma Thompson shines in a brief role. Mary Steenburgen, however, is tiresomely typecast.
On the whole, 'A Walk in the Woods' is worth a watch.
This One Is A Rental
zardoz-1317 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"A Walk in the Woods" has its share of amusing moments, and it is always a pleasure to watch Robert Redford and Nick Nolte, not to mention Emma Thompson and Mary Steenburgen. Nevertheless, stunning scenery and okay dialogue can only get you so far. Our senior citizens, Bill Bryson (Robert Redford) and Stephen Katz (Nick Nolte of "48 Hrs"), set out to hike the Appalachian Trail, and there are some good moments among the routine ones. The encounter with the bears is the high point of their shenanigans. The bears raid their camping area, and our heroes stand up in their little tents and shout back at them to run them. At one point, Nolte romances a two-ton Tessie in a Laundromat when they take time out to sleep in separate motel rooms. The woman asks Stephen to help her remove her panties from the washing machine and one thing leads to another, and he finds himself pursued by her jealous husband. Emma Thompson plays Redford's wife. She is a retired nurse that he met during his residence in England. She is flatly against the hike and insists that he take somebody with him. She loads him down with articles about the perils of hiking, the diseases that can be contracted by woodland creatures, and the possibility of foul play, but Redford perseveres and his old friend, who owes him $600, asks to come along. Mind you, our duo crap out and never finish the hike. I cannot imagine what Redford, who co-produced, and Nolte, who co-starred, saw in the Rick Kerb & Bill Holderman screenplay. The running joke is Stephen keeps prodding Bryson about the book that he is going to write, and Bryson tells him that he has no plans to pen their journey. "A Walk in the Woods" concludes with Bryson sitting down at his laptop to start the book. If you object to profanity and questionable subject matter, "A Walk in the Woods" might not be your choice of entertainment. Altogether, this Ken Kwapis movie qualifies as a potboiler. At one point during their rugged hike, our heroes lose their footing and tumble down the side of a trail—not very far but far enough that they cannot climb back up for lack of anything to grab a hold of—and they find themselves on a high point over looking a river gurgling below them. I thought about a better Robert Redford movie movie "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid." Oh, well, they cannot all be memorable. The film boasts great cinematography, a sturdy cast, and solid production values, but the material is strictly lightweight.
Missed Opportunity
rick-99218 September 2015
I went to see this movie today, having read the original book by Bill Bryson and subsequently listened to a hilarious 'audio book' version narrated by Kerry Shale.
My first comment is that Robert Redford is just too old, way too old, for the part. By my estimate, Bill Bryson was less than 50 when he walked the trail with Katz, whereas Redford is 78. It made a big and substantial difference to my enjoyment of the movie, since a lot of the humour in the book comes from the fact that it's two middle-aged slightly overweight guys who start the walk, not two old men.
Furthermore, I found Emma Thompson's portrayal of Catherine Bryson simply irritating and humourless. Like Robert Redford, I felt she just turned up and did her lines.
Many of the best anecdotes from the book appear in the movie, and yet somehow none is anything like as funny as in the book/audio book. For example, the overweight nasal-sounding Mary Ellen segment just isn't as funny in the movie not least because the actress playing Mary Ellen is not overweight and therefore her jibe at Katz for being overweight misses the joke.
Overall, the movie was light and amusing in places, but bad casting and uncommitted acting makes it just average and with a heavy heart I rate it just 6/10. And trust me, I went in with fairly low expectations yet hoping for a good laugh. It was worse than I expected and not as funny as I'd hoped.
My first comment is that Robert Redford is just too old, way too old, for the part. By my estimate, Bill Bryson was less than 50 when he walked the trail with Katz, whereas Redford is 78. It made a big and substantial difference to my enjoyment of the movie, since a lot of the humour in the book comes from the fact that it's two middle-aged slightly overweight guys who start the walk, not two old men.
Furthermore, I found Emma Thompson's portrayal of Catherine Bryson simply irritating and humourless. Like Robert Redford, I felt she just turned up and did her lines.
Many of the best anecdotes from the book appear in the movie, and yet somehow none is anything like as funny as in the book/audio book. For example, the overweight nasal-sounding Mary Ellen segment just isn't as funny in the movie not least because the actress playing Mary Ellen is not overweight and therefore her jibe at Katz for being overweight misses the joke.
Overall, the movie was light and amusing in places, but bad casting and uncommitted acting makes it just average and with a heavy heart I rate it just 6/10. And trust me, I went in with fairly low expectations yet hoping for a good laugh. It was worse than I expected and not as funny as I'd hoped.
Good Movie to Watch and Chill
docm-3230418 June 2021
Almost Makes You Want to Try It
Hitchcoc13 January 2016
Bill Bryson is a national treasure. His books are so pleasant to read. This book takes us on a natural joyride. This is the kind of thing that would attract Robert Redford, and it did. Redford plays the middle aged Bryson who, after attending the funeral of a friend his age, decides to hike the Appalachian Trail, a hiking trip of over 2000 miles from Georgia to Maine, much to the chagrin of his wife. He joins up with the only guy who is willing to accompany him, an overweight, recovering alcoholic played by Nick Nolte. Bryson/Redford has no respect for this guy. The complaining starts after they've gone about a hundred years. As time goes along, there is a story to tell and it is charming. Unfortunately, the good buddies thing, while entertaining, has been done so many times. Nolte is a really interesting character, while Redford is stiff and pretty boring. It's very predictable. The scenery is great and we get a sense of what is involved in all of this. Not a bad movie. It's just a little lacking in oomph.
Read the book, watch the film then hike the trail.
JPLeverich-16 August 2015
Caught a screening of this movie in Salt Lake City. The Appalachian Trail Conservancy put it on. What a fun movie, Nolte is great in it!! I was quite surprised on how funny he was. Redford and Nolte make a good team. About time a Bryson book got up on the big screen. I wonder how much of an increase in foot traffic there will be on the AT after this movie gets released. I'm sure next summer will be quite a bit busier. If a movie makes me want to go to the location/s it takes place I count that as a great movie. If you are a fan of the book, actors, hiking, nature or have hiked the AT you should enjoy this one. Well worth the visit to the cinema.
Over the hills & thru the Woods..
peggyatthemovies2 September 2015
A Walk in the Woods is essentially a two-hander piece between Robert Redford's Bill Bryson, a traveling writer who teams up with his old companion Stephen Katz (Nick Nolte) for a hike along the 2,000 mile- plus Appalachian Trail. Bryson is a sarcastically funny cynic who has his life in a certain order that has become mundane for him, whereas Katz is a grumpy recovering alcoholic who still tries to re-live and remain in his more youthful days. Their contrasts can appear a tad caricature like, but their acting ability, charm, and on-screen chemistry binds the film together well.
Its a nice witty, little jaunt of a film and while some could be of the opinion that Redford might have wanted to make a bit of an environmental statement here (I disagree), Nolte keeps us entertained all through till the end. Seeing Emma Thompson is always a delight as Redford's wife Catherine Bryson, but it's truly Kristen Schaal as Mary Ellen, the annoying, obnoxious fellow traveler whom talks endlessly and knows all, that brings the most to her small, albeit scene stealing role.
As you might expect, yes there are a few lullsy moments throughout the film but A Walk in the Woods is no Wild nor does it try to be.. it's more 'The Odd Couple' on a roadtrip – buddy type film with Redford as Felix and Nolte as Oscar. It's a safe bet that will appeal to a older audience, though they might be a bit surprised with some of the language by these two wonderful actors and while very sweet..I would definitely put it in the category of "sweet & nice" which is a perfectly okay way to spend a few hours!!
Grade: C
@pegsatthemovies peggyatthemovies.com
Its a nice witty, little jaunt of a film and while some could be of the opinion that Redford might have wanted to make a bit of an environmental statement here (I disagree), Nolte keeps us entertained all through till the end. Seeing Emma Thompson is always a delight as Redford's wife Catherine Bryson, but it's truly Kristen Schaal as Mary Ellen, the annoying, obnoxious fellow traveler whom talks endlessly and knows all, that brings the most to her small, albeit scene stealing role.
As you might expect, yes there are a few lullsy moments throughout the film but A Walk in the Woods is no Wild nor does it try to be.. it's more 'The Odd Couple' on a roadtrip – buddy type film with Redford as Felix and Nolte as Oscar. It's a safe bet that will appeal to a older audience, though they might be a bit surprised with some of the language by these two wonderful actors and while very sweet..I would definitely put it in the category of "sweet & nice" which is a perfectly okay way to spend a few hours!!
Grade: C
@pegsatthemovies peggyatthemovies.com
Poor Screen Adapation of Bill Bryson's Book
snicewanger27 September 2015
I really wanted to see A Walk in the Woods.I should have known better. Bill Bryson is my favorite author and A Walk in the Woods is one of my favorite Bryson books.I know how movie makers take the printed word and turn into something totally different on the screen. So it is with this film. I really couldn't recognize anything about this movie.This really should have been call Grumpy Old Hikers. I suppose that if I had not associated the movie with the book,I should have enjoyed it a great deal more.My wife thought is was a wonderful movie but she has never read the book.
For me the biggest problem was that I thought Redford was totally miscast as Bill Bryson. He makes Bryson a kind of judgmental, holier then thou, snob. Nolte as Katz is very amusing as a crusty old Iowa coot with an overactive libido and he takes the comedy honors. Mary Steenburgen has a nice little turn as a MILF motel owner named Jeannie who gives Bryson the eye. Emma Thompson is totally wasted as Mrs Bryson. Sandra Ellis Lafferty has a short but hilarious bit as Jeannie's widowed mom who develops an immediate sexual fixation on Katz.The rest of the cast is unmemorable.
I can't recommend this movie. I was just too disappointed in it.
For me the biggest problem was that I thought Redford was totally miscast as Bill Bryson. He makes Bryson a kind of judgmental, holier then thou, snob. Nolte as Katz is very amusing as a crusty old Iowa coot with an overactive libido and he takes the comedy honors. Mary Steenburgen has a nice little turn as a MILF motel owner named Jeannie who gives Bryson the eye. Emma Thompson is totally wasted as Mrs Bryson. Sandra Ellis Lafferty has a short but hilarious bit as Jeannie's widowed mom who develops an immediate sexual fixation on Katz.The rest of the cast is unmemorable.
I can't recommend this movie. I was just too disappointed in it.
A Thoroughly Enjoyable Trek
clg2383 September 2015
Okay, this movie isn't great art, but it's delightful, funny, filled with veteran actors (Nick Nolte, Robert Redford, Mary Steenburgen, and Emma Thompson who, as usual, is absolutely perfect for the part she plays. I loved it because I'm not a hiker, and I truly felt every bit of resistance that Nolte's character expresses to being out in nature while on foot. There are many, many lines that made me laugh out loud. I am not a laugh-out-loud person generally and I didn't read the book, so I don't know whether Bryson is responsible. I am also resistant to feel-good movies but this was definitely in that genre. I've always loved Nick Nolte and am sad that he has become so obese, but his innate attractiveness made me forget how misshapen he is. Definitely (contrary to at least one reviewer's claims) there was a lot about mortality. Definitely (contrary to a couple of reviewers' claims) there is a plot and there is a destination (I say this as a published novelist and short story writer, as well as a former teacher of creative writing). I suspect this movie appeals more to people of a certain age—it certainly appealed to me.
Nolte outshines Redford
valleyjohn20 March 2016
A walk in the woods is a gentle comedy about writer Bill Bryson who decides the best way to connect with his homeland is to hike the Appalachian Trail with one of his oldest friends. I thought this was going to be one of those movies where the sensible one has to put up with his irritating friend from the past but it wasn't like that all . Once I got past the slightly annoying voice of Nick Nolte I actually really liked his character , Stephen. He seemed to be the fun one , the one who was good company whilst Bill Bryson was a bit of a miserable old git. It's a little bit depressing to see two extremely well known actors grow old but there is no doubt they both still have it. There weren't many belly laughs in this but there were plenty of moments that made me smile.
A Walk Right Out of the Theater
art_by_andi10 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
'A Walk in the Woods' (2015) is the long awaited adaptation of the beloved 1998 book by Bill Bryson. And I have to say, as a huge fan of the book, I was extremely excited to hear that this was finally being made into a movie. I also have to say it was one of the most disappointing cinema experiences of my life. The film follows Robert Redford as author Bill Bryson as he makes an ill attempted trek along the famed Appalachian Trail with his long estranged friend Steven Katz, played by Nick Nolte. Despite the fact that both book and film have the same tag-line premise, this movie was about as far away from the source material as it could possibly get.
Visually speaking, it was incredibly boring. Stylistically reminiscent of a Hallmark Channel flick, I expect to see this movie playing in the waiting room of my local dentist office. Despite the fact that the plot revolves around two geriatrics traversing an expansive and rugged mountain trail, roughly two thousand miles of track stretching from Georgia to Main, well over half of the movie takes place in diners, motels, laundromats, and the local Kmart. What parts of the film do take place on the trail are close shots of camping tents or convenient mountain ledges that vaguely reveal just enough of the surrounding nature that the audience can tell the scene takes place outdoors.
This is robs the film of its core plot line. Director Ken Kwapis took all of the natural beauty from the movie and replaced it with cheap gags and old men bickering to each other.The title of the movie is 'A Walk in the Woods' but maybe a more appropriate title would be 'Stumbling through the Parking Lot'. All of Bryson's rich and moving commentary about the history of environmental thought in America is summed up with an offhand comment by Redford about a tree.
The dialogue and writing is almost entirely composed of tired clichés that I feel like I've seen better in a thousand other films. Kwapis forced the theme of dealing with regrets in later life and having one last adventure before buying the farm. What he ends up with is a few painfully awkward scenes between Redford and Mary Steenburgen as Bryson considers having an affair on his wife (played by Emma Thompson). Nolte's Katz later tries to pick up a woman in the laundromat and the intrepid hikers must escape out a window, just as the audience ponders escaping the theater.
The poor writing and forced jokes are almost unbearable; an opinion apparently shared by the cast of the film, as none of them seemed to want to be there. This leaves the audience to watch stiff, awkward, and disjointed performances from the otherwise talented actors. Redford's Bryson comes across as elitist, judgmental, and boring. While Nolte's Katz is indescribably hard to watch; hobbling along the trail at an improbable pace given his many supposed ailments and gargling out enough F-bombs as to make the dialogue seem lopsided. Thompson almost seems embarrassed to be in the three scenes in which she appears.
It is unclear as to the intended audience for this movie. Instead of making a movie that fans of the book would love, Kwapis made a cheesy drama that I would feel is insulting to fans of the book, all hikers and outdoor enthusiasts, and the elderly community in general. The best parts of the book were removed and replaced with unnecessary drama, dumb jokes that don't even qualify as slapstick, and a hopeless feeling that Bryson and Katz are hiking not towards a better friendship and an appreciation for nature, but towards their failure and regret laden graves.
Overall, this film has absolutely no redeeming qualities. Reading the book inspired me to hike the Appalachian Trail so I could be a part of American history and gain a better appreciation of the natural world. Watching the movie inspired me to hike the Appalachian Trail so I could get as far away from the movie as possible.
Visually speaking, it was incredibly boring. Stylistically reminiscent of a Hallmark Channel flick, I expect to see this movie playing in the waiting room of my local dentist office. Despite the fact that the plot revolves around two geriatrics traversing an expansive and rugged mountain trail, roughly two thousand miles of track stretching from Georgia to Main, well over half of the movie takes place in diners, motels, laundromats, and the local Kmart. What parts of the film do take place on the trail are close shots of camping tents or convenient mountain ledges that vaguely reveal just enough of the surrounding nature that the audience can tell the scene takes place outdoors.
This is robs the film of its core plot line. Director Ken Kwapis took all of the natural beauty from the movie and replaced it with cheap gags and old men bickering to each other.The title of the movie is 'A Walk in the Woods' but maybe a more appropriate title would be 'Stumbling through the Parking Lot'. All of Bryson's rich and moving commentary about the history of environmental thought in America is summed up with an offhand comment by Redford about a tree.
The dialogue and writing is almost entirely composed of tired clichés that I feel like I've seen better in a thousand other films. Kwapis forced the theme of dealing with regrets in later life and having one last adventure before buying the farm. What he ends up with is a few painfully awkward scenes between Redford and Mary Steenburgen as Bryson considers having an affair on his wife (played by Emma Thompson). Nolte's Katz later tries to pick up a woman in the laundromat and the intrepid hikers must escape out a window, just as the audience ponders escaping the theater.
The poor writing and forced jokes are almost unbearable; an opinion apparently shared by the cast of the film, as none of them seemed to want to be there. This leaves the audience to watch stiff, awkward, and disjointed performances from the otherwise talented actors. Redford's Bryson comes across as elitist, judgmental, and boring. While Nolte's Katz is indescribably hard to watch; hobbling along the trail at an improbable pace given his many supposed ailments and gargling out enough F-bombs as to make the dialogue seem lopsided. Thompson almost seems embarrassed to be in the three scenes in which she appears.
It is unclear as to the intended audience for this movie. Instead of making a movie that fans of the book would love, Kwapis made a cheesy drama that I would feel is insulting to fans of the book, all hikers and outdoor enthusiasts, and the elderly community in general. The best parts of the book were removed and replaced with unnecessary drama, dumb jokes that don't even qualify as slapstick, and a hopeless feeling that Bryson and Katz are hiking not towards a better friendship and an appreciation for nature, but towards their failure and regret laden graves.
Overall, this film has absolutely no redeeming qualities. Reading the book inspired me to hike the Appalachian Trail so I could be a part of American history and gain a better appreciation of the natural world. Watching the movie inspired me to hike the Appalachian Trail so I could get as far away from the movie as possible.
Why leave out the best jokes?
archiecm31 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I read the book and wondered at the time how it could be transformed into a movie since better than two-thirds of it is a discussion of history and nature -- interesting but not at all cinematic. The funniest part is towards the beginning when they meet Mary Ellen. Katz calls her "a piece of work" though they leave this out of the film. When she brags about walking fourteen miles when it was really 8.2 and won't budge from that position Katz asks her, "How many miles did your lips hike?" She doesn't get the jibe and gives a straight answer, "Just as many as the rest of me." The film, like I said, leaves this out. Too bad. They part from her to go to town but she finds them again the next day as they have eaten all but one of their Hostess cream-filled cupcakes. (They're staring at it pleasantly as it sits on a log nearby.) She arrives with some insult about how slow they're traveling, and grabs the cupcake and with a, "Say,is that a Hostess cupcake? Well, I don't mind if I do,"-- wolfs it down in two bites. The film leaves this out. When she's trying to show off her sense of people and their astrological signs she quizzes them: What's your sign? She asks Katz. "Cunnilingus," he answers. I cracked up. But the movie left that out. The movie has them give some actual sign like Virgo. Then she asks Bryson his sign. "Necrophilia," he answers. "Ah, come on. Are you guys putting me on?" She asks. The movie left this whole thing out and went with an unfunny segment where she tells them they don't know their actual signs but she does know them. Amusing but not as amusing as what really happened.
The arduous journey, the hardship, the challenges are left out for the most part. Instead it is kind of a buddy picture. In the book they don't talk all that much. One thing that comes across in the book is how much Bryson is into seeing as much of the trail as he can, and knowing about it's history and doing the work of hiking it. He does quite a bit of it on his own while Katz is back in Iowa. He does day trips day after day. None of this energy, this craving to know and master . . . comes through from the book. Redford is too old to have carried off this kind of zeal and energy. So I missed seeing that. Perhaps he should have cast someone younger for both roles. Just a thought.
The arduous journey, the hardship, the challenges are left out for the most part. Instead it is kind of a buddy picture. In the book they don't talk all that much. One thing that comes across in the book is how much Bryson is into seeing as much of the trail as he can, and knowing about it's history and doing the work of hiking it. He does quite a bit of it on his own while Katz is back in Iowa. He does day trips day after day. None of this energy, this craving to know and master . . . comes through from the book. Redford is too old to have carried off this kind of zeal and energy. So I missed seeing that. Perhaps he should have cast someone younger for both roles. Just a thought.
funny with veteran duo
SnoopyStyle11 January 2016
Bill Bryson (Robert Redford) is a travel writer but he hasn't written anything significant for 4 years. After attending a friend's funeral, he has an idea to walk the Appalachian Trail. His wife Catherine (Emma Thompson) and family disapprove, she forces him to take on a partner. He's contacted by old estranged friend Stephen Katz (Nick Nolte). Katz turns out to be in worst shape than expected with two bad knees. They start from Georgia looking to finish in six months in Maine.
This is a light funny comedy. It's great to see these two serious actors have some fun. I understand Kristen Schaal is suppose to be annoying but she's a bit too good at her job. Mary Steenburgen is endearing. Everybody is very charming and there's no reason why silly, broad comedies can't be done by the older generation.
This is a light funny comedy. It's great to see these two serious actors have some fun. I understand Kristen Schaal is suppose to be annoying but she's a bit too good at her job. Mary Steenburgen is endearing. Everybody is very charming and there's no reason why silly, broad comedies can't be done by the older generation.
A Pleasant Journey with Two Great Actors
Michael_Elliott23 September 2015
A Walk in the Woods (2015)
*** (out of 4)
After living overseas for nearly two decades, author Bill Bryson (Robert Redford) decides he wants to walk the Appalachian Trail and goes out searching for a friend to go with him. Everyone turns him down until Stephen (Nick Nolte), a man he hasn't seen in decades, gives him a call and is willing to go. Soon the two are reliving good times as they try to prove everyone wrong and finish the journey.
If you're looking for a film that changes the course of movie history or one that breaks new grounds then you're not going to find it in A WALK IN THE WOODS. If you're looking to see two great actors having fun then there's enough entertainment to keep this film moving even though it's just a few bits more intelligent than something like GRUMPY OLD MEN. In fact, there's certainly nothing challenging to be found in this picture but we all know that Hollywood is a young man's game so getting to see Redford and Nolte playing the leads is reason enough to see this film.
The two veteran actors are certainly the reason to watch the movie as both of them fit perfectly into their roles and make for some memorable characters. Redford is pretty much playing an older version of various characters we've seen him play in the past. Smart, rich, good looking and seemingly having everything that anyone would want in life. He really does nail the comic timing of the performance but there's also something much deeper working. As for Nolte, he certainly isn't that most beautiful man alive anymore but he doesn't shy away from it and has fun in the role of an out of shape man who will try and sleep with anything. The two actors have some wonderful chemistry together and really make for a great team. Emma Thompson and Mary Steenburgen are also fun in their small supporting roles.
The screenplay certainly isn't ground-breaking but I'm not going to bash the film for not being deeper, smarter or more challenging. Not every movie needs to be something overly serious all of the time. A WALK IN THE WOODS is just a fun little movie where two actors get to have some fun and we get a lot of nice scenery along the way.
*** (out of 4)
After living overseas for nearly two decades, author Bill Bryson (Robert Redford) decides he wants to walk the Appalachian Trail and goes out searching for a friend to go with him. Everyone turns him down until Stephen (Nick Nolte), a man he hasn't seen in decades, gives him a call and is willing to go. Soon the two are reliving good times as they try to prove everyone wrong and finish the journey.
If you're looking for a film that changes the course of movie history or one that breaks new grounds then you're not going to find it in A WALK IN THE WOODS. If you're looking to see two great actors having fun then there's enough entertainment to keep this film moving even though it's just a few bits more intelligent than something like GRUMPY OLD MEN. In fact, there's certainly nothing challenging to be found in this picture but we all know that Hollywood is a young man's game so getting to see Redford and Nolte playing the leads is reason enough to see this film.
The two veteran actors are certainly the reason to watch the movie as both of them fit perfectly into their roles and make for some memorable characters. Redford is pretty much playing an older version of various characters we've seen him play in the past. Smart, rich, good looking and seemingly having everything that anyone would want in life. He really does nail the comic timing of the performance but there's also something much deeper working. As for Nolte, he certainly isn't that most beautiful man alive anymore but he doesn't shy away from it and has fun in the role of an out of shape man who will try and sleep with anything. The two actors have some wonderful chemistry together and really make for a great team. Emma Thompson and Mary Steenburgen are also fun in their small supporting roles.
The screenplay certainly isn't ground-breaking but I'm not going to bash the film for not being deeper, smarter or more challenging. Not every movie needs to be something overly serious all of the time. A WALK IN THE WOODS is just a fun little movie where two actors get to have some fun and we get a lot of nice scenery along the way.
Decent movie about aging and time closing in
statuskuo6 September 2015
It's hard to imagine Redford or Nolte ever looking back at their careers and wondering if they've done enough in life. It seems this is the reason to do this movie.
This isn't a great movie, but it is a poignant one. More of what it could've been than what it actually was. In this sense, it could've transcended the weak material.
You see, Paul Newman was suppose to play Robert Redford's walking partner. Can you imagine the possibilities of that? It would essentially be Butch Cassidy and Sundance back and reliving their adventures. There's even a moment where in the movie they're stuck on a cliff. Wouldn't that have brought back memories? It's not that Nick Nolte doesn't do an acceptable job, but somehow I kept imagining Newman saying the lines and excited about the possibilities. The story is about Bill Bryson, a writer who lived as an ex-patriot American who married an Englishwoman (Emma Thompson). He's a writer of travel throughout Europe. And has been awarded throughout his career. When learning about the death of friends, it jars him into figuring out what the real accomplishments have been. It turns out, he doesn't want to wait to die. So he decides to hike the Appalachian trail. An over 2,000 mile treacherous hike. Apparently many quit within the first week. His wife gives him a mandate that he can't travel alone. Much to his dismay, all his friends have either physical ailments, no interest, or just mock his late-life crisis. Except for one friend. And not even a friend. A man whom he'd lost contact with 40 years earlier. Enter Nick Nolte. Upon their reunion, you realize he's lived a rough life. You get the sense he hasn't let go of his past, but really still lives in the midst of it. A party guy who doesn't even realize it's over. So he lives a rambling life. Devoid of stability. He reaches out to Redford to go on this trek. What reason may he have? Of course, they run into interesting quirky characters. You understand that these MUST be people that they encounter in real life. Which I feel they could've exploited more of. I think they've milked the travelers properly, but it seems they run out of gas, since they start to veer far off the trail. Also, you don't fully understand how far they've actually traveled. There is a moment when they read a map, but it seems there needs to sense the trek in them. Then as fast as it begins, it also seems to end.
I like that Redford doesn't fear looking the fool. There are broad comedy moments that you don't expect from someone who is usually seen as being so serious. He enjoys a good poop joke. Or a bear attack joke that is reminiscent of something that Chris Farley would do. In that sense, I respect that fearlessness.
It's a good watch on a slow night. No new ground broken, but the two do have fun. And there are moments which ring extremely true for me, especially when it came to the past drunken days that take a toll as older men.
This isn't a great movie, but it is a poignant one. More of what it could've been than what it actually was. In this sense, it could've transcended the weak material.
You see, Paul Newman was suppose to play Robert Redford's walking partner. Can you imagine the possibilities of that? It would essentially be Butch Cassidy and Sundance back and reliving their adventures. There's even a moment where in the movie they're stuck on a cliff. Wouldn't that have brought back memories? It's not that Nick Nolte doesn't do an acceptable job, but somehow I kept imagining Newman saying the lines and excited about the possibilities. The story is about Bill Bryson, a writer who lived as an ex-patriot American who married an Englishwoman (Emma Thompson). He's a writer of travel throughout Europe. And has been awarded throughout his career. When learning about the death of friends, it jars him into figuring out what the real accomplishments have been. It turns out, he doesn't want to wait to die. So he decides to hike the Appalachian trail. An over 2,000 mile treacherous hike. Apparently many quit within the first week. His wife gives him a mandate that he can't travel alone. Much to his dismay, all his friends have either physical ailments, no interest, or just mock his late-life crisis. Except for one friend. And not even a friend. A man whom he'd lost contact with 40 years earlier. Enter Nick Nolte. Upon their reunion, you realize he's lived a rough life. You get the sense he hasn't let go of his past, but really still lives in the midst of it. A party guy who doesn't even realize it's over. So he lives a rambling life. Devoid of stability. He reaches out to Redford to go on this trek. What reason may he have? Of course, they run into interesting quirky characters. You understand that these MUST be people that they encounter in real life. Which I feel they could've exploited more of. I think they've milked the travelers properly, but it seems they run out of gas, since they start to veer far off the trail. Also, you don't fully understand how far they've actually traveled. There is a moment when they read a map, but it seems there needs to sense the trek in them. Then as fast as it begins, it also seems to end.
I like that Redford doesn't fear looking the fool. There are broad comedy moments that you don't expect from someone who is usually seen as being so serious. He enjoys a good poop joke. Or a bear attack joke that is reminiscent of something that Chris Farley would do. In that sense, I respect that fearlessness.
It's a good watch on a slow night. No new ground broken, but the two do have fun. And there are moments which ring extremely true for me, especially when it came to the past drunken days that take a toll as older men.
Nolte Walks the Walk
drjgardner10 September 2015
The film has some good moments in the exchanges between Robert Redford and Nick Nolte, and between Redford and Emma Thompson, but apart from these clever moments, accompanied by some good acting from Thompson and Nolte, the film is all too predictable. There are some nice location scenes, but nothing you haven't already seen on TV, and perhaps better. And I was disappointed in the musical score that added nothing to the film.
Nolte's performance, on the other hand, is memorable and one of his best in the last decade or so. It's well worth the price of admission to watch Nolte steal every scene
Nolte's performance, on the other hand, is memorable and one of his best in the last decade or so. It's well worth the price of admission to watch Nolte steal every scene
Fun and Intelligent Hike
bulldozer10005 September 2015
I truly enjoyed this movie, had all experienced, professional actors and actresses and it showed. Those critics that say there is no plot or drama are either too young to appreciate the aging life lessons and insights or too serious and particular and need to lighten up. I, and many in the theater, had quite a few laugh out loud moments. This is a movie for the more mature, intelligent crowd. Not for someone looking for a tense drama, or twitch action flick. I have not read the book but have read reviews that stated the book was even better so I know what my next read will be. This movie had some great nature shots of the AT which was an added bonus. Thought Nick Nolte and Robert Redford were good casting for their characters.
Nice story...
Thanos_Alfie6 June 2021
"A Walk in the Woods" is a Biography - Adventure movie in which we follow to old friends reunite and try to hike the Appalachian Trail. They both find that it's the best solution to the different problems or thoughts that they have.
I liked this movie because it had a simple plot but it was enjoyable. It also consisted of some funny scenes that had a nice contrast with the difficulties which the main characters faced and had to overcome. The interpretations of both Robert Redford who played as Bill Bryson and Nick Nolte who played as Stephen Katz were very good and they had a good connection. The direction which was made by Ken Kwapis, it was good and he presented his main characters very well while he also showed us many beautiful sceneries. Lastly, I have to say that "A Walk in the Woods" is a nice, enjoyable movie and I highly recommend you to watch it because I am sure that you will enjoy it too.
I liked this movie because it had a simple plot but it was enjoyable. It also consisted of some funny scenes that had a nice contrast with the difficulties which the main characters faced and had to overcome. The interpretations of both Robert Redford who played as Bill Bryson and Nick Nolte who played as Stephen Katz were very good and they had a good connection. The direction which was made by Ken Kwapis, it was good and he presented his main characters very well while he also showed us many beautiful sceneries. Lastly, I have to say that "A Walk in the Woods" is a nice, enjoyable movie and I highly recommend you to watch it because I am sure that you will enjoy it too.
The essence of Bill Bryson eluded this slapstick tragedy
manders_steve11 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I really like Bill Bryson's gentle, whimsical, poignant story telling. He has a great gift to spot the interesting side to common situations most of us miss. He has no problem pointing out his own failings or acknowledging the strengths and abilities of others. And so I was looking forward to seeing Ken Kwapsis's movie version, having read and enjoyed the original book shortly after it was released in 1998. 'A walk in the woods' gave more insight into Bryson than the travel based books of his I had read, and I really enjoyed it.
Sadly, this film doesn't even come close to capturing any of the strengths of the book. I recognised a few scenes, but they were slapstick caricatures of the sorts of amusing situations that do occur on long bushwalks, or moments of insight into the foibles of our lives.
Bill Bryson was born in 1951, and 'A walk in the woods' was first published in 1998, when he was 47. So I suppose he would have been in his mid 40s when the trip took place. What those in charge were thinking of when a nearly 80 year old actor was cast to play the lead, even a fit one like Robert Redford, I cannot imagine. Nick Nolte as Bryson's accomplice looked and acted equally frailly, reflecting Stephen Katz' ability, or more accurately lack of, to look after himself. This was the film's first and for me most fatal flaw – there is just no way these two could have done even a tenth of what was being portrayed.
Most of the supporting cast were superficial, or lacked the subtlety of the original. The only convincing character for me was Emma Thompson as Catherine Bryson, Bill's wife. But the gentle pace of the film seemed about right, even though it meant being selective about which parts of the book made it to the big screen. It's not the sort of adventure that would reward a feeling of haste.
The film didn't seem to make the most of what I suppose must be amazing scenery – much was shot in in flat light from moderately overcast skies.
There are a few long walk films around at the moment – Reece Witherspoon pulling herself back together on the Pacific Crest trail in Wild and pilgrims Walking the Camino spring to mind. And both of these are far superior films in my view.
Sadly, this film doesn't even come close to capturing any of the strengths of the book. I recognised a few scenes, but they were slapstick caricatures of the sorts of amusing situations that do occur on long bushwalks, or moments of insight into the foibles of our lives.
Bill Bryson was born in 1951, and 'A walk in the woods' was first published in 1998, when he was 47. So I suppose he would have been in his mid 40s when the trip took place. What those in charge were thinking of when a nearly 80 year old actor was cast to play the lead, even a fit one like Robert Redford, I cannot imagine. Nick Nolte as Bryson's accomplice looked and acted equally frailly, reflecting Stephen Katz' ability, or more accurately lack of, to look after himself. This was the film's first and for me most fatal flaw – there is just no way these two could have done even a tenth of what was being portrayed.
Most of the supporting cast were superficial, or lacked the subtlety of the original. The only convincing character for me was Emma Thompson as Catherine Bryson, Bill's wife. But the gentle pace of the film seemed about right, even though it meant being selective about which parts of the book made it to the big screen. It's not the sort of adventure that would reward a feeling of haste.
The film didn't seem to make the most of what I suppose must be amazing scenery – much was shot in in flat light from moderately overcast skies.
There are a few long walk films around at the moment – Reece Witherspoon pulling herself back together on the Pacific Crest trail in Wild and pilgrims Walking the Camino spring to mind. And both of these are far superior films in my view.
A peaceful close to a summer featuring a wide variety of strong and memorable films
StevePulaski6 September 2015
"A Walk in the Woods" is precisely what I expected from a comedy-drama about two geezers hiking across the Appalachian Trail as a means of reacquainting themselves with the soil of their homeland. This is a film for the often neglected baby-boomer crowd that doesn't get out to see films quite often, mainly because most of what's out doesn't appeal to them. Amidst the noise of "Straight Outta Compton," the mind-numbing nonsense of "Hitman: Agent 47" and "The Transporter: Refueled," there's this low-key gem that provides for a restful trip to the theater.
The film is a biopic of author Bill Bryson (Robert Redford), who has lived out the last two decades exploring Britain and authoring books before returning to New Hampshire and living peacefully with his wife. In his sixties, he has put writing to the side, living out the last years of his life in solitude and tranquility, but is suddenly moved by the death of a friend enough to have one last adventure in him. Spontaneously, he comes up with the idea to hike over 2,000 miles along the Appalachian Trail as a testament to the will of a person and to become reacquainted with the soil he left decades ago.
He inquires numerous friends, most of whom dismiss him in rude or casual ways, and figures that he'll have no one to embark on this journey with. Again, out of nowhere, Stephen Katz (Nick Nolte) a former friend from Bill's homestate of Iowa, phones and vocalizes his excitement about the trip. However, upon meeting one another, we see that Bill, a lean, well-built man, even for sixty, poses a stark contrast to Stephen, a portly, unkempt alcoholic in remission with the voice of a phlegm-filled smoker and the look of a street bum. The two set course for the long haul ahead of them by packing heavily and working to rekindle the fire that was their friendship.
No matter which way you dissect the film, "A Walk in the Woods" belongs to Redford and Nolte. Here are two veteran actors who, much like their characters, have a great deal of experience under their belts and know how to command a screen. Giving these actors the Appalachian Trail as their playground is like giving a seasoned artist a paintbrush and as much free time as he or she needs; they will just do what they do best and surprise you every step of the way.
Screenwriters Rick Kerb and Bill Holderman, working off of Bryson's biography of the same name, exhaust the humor possibilities of Redford and Nolte, and while a handful come in the form of situational comedy, most come from their casual conversations and musings on life. Redford's conservative, mild-mannered presence contrasted with Nolte's vulgar, brutally honest demeanor, with a voice that seems to speak from the realms of pain, doubt, and years of alcohol dependency, create the age-old contrast in a buddy movie. Looking past formula and basic structure, Redford and Nolte know how to make this simple script work and that is by way of charm and emphasis on character and life experience.
This is a more straight-forward film than last year's "Wild," which, while very strong, was bogged down by a heavy emphasis on symbolism and too much exposition. Here, the humor in the film is consistent enough to call this a comedy, and the drama is just enough to make you feel without being overwhelmed. Much like the chemistry on display here, "A Walk in the Woods" is a decidedly amiable picture, predicated off of simplicities and amiable charm that's good for a few chuckles and a peaceful close to the summer of a wide variety of strong and memorable films.
The film is a biopic of author Bill Bryson (Robert Redford), who has lived out the last two decades exploring Britain and authoring books before returning to New Hampshire and living peacefully with his wife. In his sixties, he has put writing to the side, living out the last years of his life in solitude and tranquility, but is suddenly moved by the death of a friend enough to have one last adventure in him. Spontaneously, he comes up with the idea to hike over 2,000 miles along the Appalachian Trail as a testament to the will of a person and to become reacquainted with the soil he left decades ago.
He inquires numerous friends, most of whom dismiss him in rude or casual ways, and figures that he'll have no one to embark on this journey with. Again, out of nowhere, Stephen Katz (Nick Nolte) a former friend from Bill's homestate of Iowa, phones and vocalizes his excitement about the trip. However, upon meeting one another, we see that Bill, a lean, well-built man, even for sixty, poses a stark contrast to Stephen, a portly, unkempt alcoholic in remission with the voice of a phlegm-filled smoker and the look of a street bum. The two set course for the long haul ahead of them by packing heavily and working to rekindle the fire that was their friendship.
No matter which way you dissect the film, "A Walk in the Woods" belongs to Redford and Nolte. Here are two veteran actors who, much like their characters, have a great deal of experience under their belts and know how to command a screen. Giving these actors the Appalachian Trail as their playground is like giving a seasoned artist a paintbrush and as much free time as he or she needs; they will just do what they do best and surprise you every step of the way.
Screenwriters Rick Kerb and Bill Holderman, working off of Bryson's biography of the same name, exhaust the humor possibilities of Redford and Nolte, and while a handful come in the form of situational comedy, most come from their casual conversations and musings on life. Redford's conservative, mild-mannered presence contrasted with Nolte's vulgar, brutally honest demeanor, with a voice that seems to speak from the realms of pain, doubt, and years of alcohol dependency, create the age-old contrast in a buddy movie. Looking past formula and basic structure, Redford and Nolte know how to make this simple script work and that is by way of charm and emphasis on character and life experience.
This is a more straight-forward film than last year's "Wild," which, while very strong, was bogged down by a heavy emphasis on symbolism and too much exposition. Here, the humor in the film is consistent enough to call this a comedy, and the drama is just enough to make you feel without being overwhelmed. Much like the chemistry on display here, "A Walk in the Woods" is a decidedly amiable picture, predicated off of simplicities and amiable charm that's good for a few chuckles and a peaceful close to the summer of a wide variety of strong and memorable films.
A charming, gentle comedy
CrazyArty23 February 2022
The story of the famous author, Bill Bryson, walking the Appalachian Trail with an old buddy. A gentle comedy starring Robert Redford and Nick Nolte.
A charming movie. It has a fairly simple plot about a couple of old guys hiking in the wilderness but the story is interesting and the film well made. Redford is great.
Worth a watch.
A charming movie. It has a fairly simple plot about a couple of old guys hiking in the wilderness but the story is interesting and the film well made. Redford is great.
Worth a watch.
Walking through the woods with a walker.
jim_flowers5 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I have NOT read the book, but I understand the author was 30 years younger that Redford when he walked the Appalachian Trail. Suspension of disbelief is one thing, but believing an 80 year old is walking the trail is absurd! Nick Nolte was also way past his prime for age for the co-lead in the movie, although he did have some funny story lines. Casting was just a task that wasn't effective, especially, since Redford was executive producer, a better lead couldn't be considered or Redford's money would have walked.
Again casting really came up short. Considering Redford's age, to cast Emmma Thompson as his wife, given a 23 year age gap, with children and grandchildren no less a product of the marriage is a bit much to swallow! Later on Mary Steenburgen is cast a a potential flirtation is as equally ridiculous.
I so wanted to like this movie, but the ONLY redeeming portrayal by any actor in the movie was from Kristen Schaal a VERY ANNOYING hiker they met on the trail, she was a breath of fresh air.
And CRIMINAL is the only way I can describe the cinematography for the film give the vast beautiful vistas that should have been available on the Appalachian Trail, the scenery should have starred. Additionally, the scene where they fell over the small ledge was so HORRIBLY done on a studio set, the set director should have been shot.
All in all, one of the most disappointing movies I have seen in a long time!
Again casting really came up short. Considering Redford's age, to cast Emmma Thompson as his wife, given a 23 year age gap, with children and grandchildren no less a product of the marriage is a bit much to swallow! Later on Mary Steenburgen is cast a a potential flirtation is as equally ridiculous.
I so wanted to like this movie, but the ONLY redeeming portrayal by any actor in the movie was from Kristen Schaal a VERY ANNOYING hiker they met on the trail, she was a breath of fresh air.
And CRIMINAL is the only way I can describe the cinematography for the film give the vast beautiful vistas that should have been available on the Appalachian Trail, the scenery should have starred. Additionally, the scene where they fell over the small ledge was so HORRIBLY done on a studio set, the set director should have been shot.
All in all, one of the most disappointing movies I have seen in a long time!
I think the filmmakers put a (slightly) 'Hollywood spin' on things.
Hellmant26 January 2016
'A WALK IN THE WOODS': Three and a Half Stars (Out of Five)
A biographical comedy flick; based on the 1998 memoir, by travel writer Bill Bryson. The film tells of Bryson's ambitious attempt, to walk the Appalachian Trail; with an old friend, named Stephen Katz. The movie stars Robert Redford as Bryson, and Nick Nolte as Katz. Redford also co-produced the film, and Ken Kwapis directed it. The screenplay was written by Michael Arndt and Bill Holderman; the movie also features Emma Thompson, Mary Steenburgen, Kristen Schaal and Nick Offerman (in supporting roles). I enjoyed the film; quite a bit more, than I expected to.
Bill Bryson (Redford) was a popular travel writer; who spent two decades living in Britain, and then returned home to New Hampshire. Instead of writing more books, or retiring to live happily with his family, Bill decided to make an adventurous hike of the Appalachian Trail (in his 60s). His wife, Catherine (Thompson), worried of the dangers of him traveling the trail alone; so she insisted he ask for company. So Bill asked many of his old friends, to accompany him on his quest. His old buddy, Stephen Katz (Nolte), responded to his request. The film tells of their (often humorous) journey together.
The movie is definitely entertaining, and funny; although a little bit unbelievable, in places. It's supposedly all based on real events, but I think the filmmakers put a (slightly) 'Hollywood spin' on things. Even so, I expected the movie to be a lot cheesier than it actually is (from seeing the ads for it). Redford and Nolte both give good performances; and they at least make their characters seem genuine, and real. There's a decent amount of humor, and some effective drama, in the film, as well. I recommend it.
Watch our movie review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: https://youtu.be/j9uf6E4pnlw
A biographical comedy flick; based on the 1998 memoir, by travel writer Bill Bryson. The film tells of Bryson's ambitious attempt, to walk the Appalachian Trail; with an old friend, named Stephen Katz. The movie stars Robert Redford as Bryson, and Nick Nolte as Katz. Redford also co-produced the film, and Ken Kwapis directed it. The screenplay was written by Michael Arndt and Bill Holderman; the movie also features Emma Thompson, Mary Steenburgen, Kristen Schaal and Nick Offerman (in supporting roles). I enjoyed the film; quite a bit more, than I expected to.
Bill Bryson (Redford) was a popular travel writer; who spent two decades living in Britain, and then returned home to New Hampshire. Instead of writing more books, or retiring to live happily with his family, Bill decided to make an adventurous hike of the Appalachian Trail (in his 60s). His wife, Catherine (Thompson), worried of the dangers of him traveling the trail alone; so she insisted he ask for company. So Bill asked many of his old friends, to accompany him on his quest. His old buddy, Stephen Katz (Nolte), responded to his request. The film tells of their (often humorous) journey together.
The movie is definitely entertaining, and funny; although a little bit unbelievable, in places. It's supposedly all based on real events, but I think the filmmakers put a (slightly) 'Hollywood spin' on things. Even so, I expected the movie to be a lot cheesier than it actually is (from seeing the ads for it). Redford and Nolte both give good performances; and they at least make their characters seem genuine, and real. There's a decent amount of humor, and some effective drama, in the film, as well. I recommend it.
Watch our movie review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: https://youtu.be/j9uf6E4pnlw
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
