Discuss in Boards Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips"Great Performances" King Lear (2008)
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writer:
William Shakespeare (play)
TV Series:
Original Air Date:
6 October 2008 (Season 37, Episode 11)
Plot:
King Lear decides to abdicate and divide his kingdom between his three daughters. full summary | add synopsis
NewsDesk:
(13 articles)
2009 Emmy Nominees
(From Screen Rant. 17 July 2009, 8:40 AM, PDT)
Movie Stars For Emmy
(From FilmExperience. 16 July 2009, 9:54 AM, PDT)
User Comments:
All right, but not stellar more (2 total)
Cast
(Episode Cast overview, first billed only)| Ian McKellen | ... | King Lear | |
| William Gaunt | ... | Earl of Gloucester | |
| Philip Winchester | ... | Edmund | |
| Ben Meyjes | ... | Edgar | |
| Frances Barber | ... | Goneril | |
| Monica Dolan | ... | Regan | |
| Romola Garai | ... | Cordelia | |
| Sylvester McCoy | ... | Fool | |
| Jonathan Hyde | ... | Earl of Kent | |
| Guy Williams | ... | Duke of Cornwall | |
| Julian Harries | ... | Duke of Albany | |
| John Heffernan | ... | Oswald | |
| Russell Byrne | ... | First Gloucester Servant / Doctor | |
| David Weston | ... | A Gentleman | |
| Peter Hinton | ... | Duke of Burgundy |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
USA:150 min
Country:
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
1.66 : 1 more
Certification:
Filming Locations:
Company:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
This television production includes the same cast and director as the 2007/8 RSC production, performed on tour worldwide and at the New London Theatre, West End. more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (2 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for "Great Performances" (1972)| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| Costume question... | nicholasjordansherwood |
| Accents | lee_somerset |
| King Lear movie | namlani |
| I've been in this play.. | CatStormcloud |
| DVD available for pre-order | zancyan |
| Release Date | otingey |
Related Links
| Main series | Episode guide | Full cast and crew |
| Company credits | External reviews | News articles |
| IMDb TV section | IMDb Comedy section | IMDb UK section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |

Except for his wonderful Twelfth Night movie, I must admit I've never really been impressed with Trevor Nunn's Shakespeare productions. They are too "heavy"; too pensive (despite the frequent emphasis on songs), and just too dull. Hate to say it, but that's the effect they have on me. What a yawn-fest his Merchant of Venice was! Can that play no longer be a comedy? It was far too serious in Al Pacino's 2004 version, too. I'm glad the Globe's 2007 production of it was properly comical!
Anyway, Nunn now tackles Lear, with Britain's second-greatest living actor in the title role (no. 1, to my mind, is Derek Jacobi, who to my knowledge has however never played Lear). It should have been good. And I suppose it is fair. McKellen's Lear is competent, but it falls short of being compelling, and ends up, like the rest of the cast, being merely passable. There is nothing really special here to distinguish this production. The Fool is good (good one, McCoy!), Kent is good (although one wonders if Nunn missed the point of what Kent says just before "His countenance likes me not", since he rather strangely threw those lines out), Edgar is good, Cordelia is good (although Garai's stage time is so minuscule that you could be forgiven for not recalling her presence at all), but the rest could all have been culled from some run-of-the-mill theater production without any particular vision. Nunn may have a vision here, but I'm certainly hard put to see it. If it's there, it doesn't come clearly across. Clocking in at nearly three hours, there's just not enough good and innovative theater here to hold the attention. Yawning and boredom creeps in.
Because of the good performances by some (though one only slightly above average by McKellen), I will be gracious and magnanimous and rate this production a 7 out of 10. I dare say it barely deserves it. Then again, putting on a good King Lear is difficult indeed. Many have tried, most have failed. I'm looking forward, of course, to the upcoming Hopkins version, hoping against hope that it might beat the 1983 Olivier version as the best yet. Olivier was a fantastic Lear (with the great mane of white hair he's supposed to have), and John Hurt was an astonishingly successful Fool. Kent and Gloucester were superb. Edgar and Edmund both were perfect. This is going to be the one to beat, or even live up to, for any future Lear production - unless of course something really innovative and unusual were to be tried, as with Taymor's Titus.
I will of course need to watch this Nunn Lear again once or twice, to assure myself that it really is as average as I felt on the first watching, but, I have many other things to watch, so it won't be anytime soon. Not a historic version, this.