|
Son of Morning (2011)A young copywriter becomes the most famous man on the planet, overnight, when he is mistaken as the next messiah. Director:Yaniv RazWriter:Yaniv Raz |
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
User Lists
Related lists from IMDb users
Share this Rating
Title: Son of Morning (2011)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
Edit
Cast
| Credited cast: | |||
| Jamie-Lynn Sigler | ... | ||
| Heather Graham | ... | ||
| Danny Glover | ... | ||
| Bob Odenkirk | ... | ||
| Lorraine Bracco | ... | ||
| Stephen Root | ... | ||
| Jesse Bradford | ... | ||
| Edward Herrmann | ... | ||
| Joseph Cross | ... | ||
| Paul Telfer | ... | ||
| Steven Weber | ... | ||
| Jacqueline King | ... |
Natalie
(as Jacquelynn King)
|
|
| Blake Clark | ... | ||
| Jon Polito | ... | ||
| Derek Phillips | ... | ||
Edit
Plot Summary
|
Add Synopsis
Storyline
As an environmental catastrophe threatens the world; Phillip Katz (JOE CROSS, Milk), a stressed-out, lowly copywriter, experiences an episode of stigmata in church and is positioned as the next MESSIAH by an ambitious reporter, Josephine Tuttle (HEATHER GRAHAM). Phillip is whisked away to a lavish hotel suite as politicians, reporters, and devout fans descend upon him, each hoping to exploit Phillip for their own purposes. After becoming the most famous man on the planet in less than a day, Phillip must decide how to use his newfound celebrity... Written by Anonymous
Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)
Rated R for language, some sexuality/nudity and brief drug useParents Guide:
Add content advisory for parents »
Edit
See full technical specs »
Details
Country:
USALanguage:
EnglishRelease Date:
28 February 2011 (USA) See more »Also Known As:
Son of Mourning See more »Filming Locations:
Florida, USACompany Credits
Show detailed
company contact information
on
IMDbPro »
Son of Morning is about a 20 something nobody who is suddenly propelled into the spotlight thanks to a reaction to a prescription drug. If you are looking for any of the deep areas this premise can take you, you are sadly mistaken. I do not wish to write a bad review. Perhaps I just do not have the eyes for this film. Unfortunately, from where I am standing, this movie is reminiscent of a high school project with a much bigger budget. Every time the movie attempted to be artsy, the point was far too obvious, and had no real depth. This movie could have been much better.
And just a comment on the last review, I think the director was much too '90 with much of his film work. Many parts (i.e camera work, extra/ main character acting style, certain dialogue and continuous indulgence in it's own messages) were very sudo-avante garde.
That's all I'll say, for I do not wish to slander someone's work. However, I think all would agree, could have been much better. Too good a premise, and too many good actors for such a poor work..... (btw Danny Glover, always a gem. Best part of the film)