Numb3rs: Season 4, Episode 9

Graphic (23 Nov. 2007)

TV Episode  |  TV-PG  |   |  Crime, Drama, Mystery
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.0/10 from 154 users  
Reviews: 2 user

In this episode, it is discovered that someone has stolen, recreated and sold several copies of an extremely rare comic book. Christopher Lloyd plays the original creator of the comic book,... See full summary »



(creator), (creator), 2 more credits »
0Check in

Watch Now

$0.00 with Prime Instant Video


10 Best Back-to-School TV Shows

Dust off your varsity jacket and get excited for fall with our list of the 10 best back-to-school TV shows.

Visit our Family Entertainment Guide

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 4332 titles
created 06 Apr 2012
a list of 18 titles
created 04 Oct 2012

Related Items

Search for "Graphic" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Graphic (23 Nov 2007)

Graphic (23 Nov 2007) on IMDb 8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Numb3rs.
« Previous Episode | 71 of 119 Episodes | Next Episode »


1 video »


Episode cast overview, first billed only:
Seth Marlowe
Miles Sklar
Peter Lange
Ross Moore
Bruce Turk ...
Mark Vaughn
Gordon Garrity
Mary Gillis ...
Mrs. Garrity


In this episode, it is discovered that someone has stolen, recreated and sold several copies of an extremely rare comic book. Christopher Lloyd plays the original creator of the comic book, who no longer benefits from his past creations. Having thought that his comics wouldn't be worth much in the future, he either lost or sold his entire collection and regrets it now that he and his wife live on very little. His young friend and fellow comics artist, played by Ben Feldman, publicly humiliates the rich man who owned the original before it was stolen. Written by Wendy Nind

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


TV-PG | See all certifications »




Release Date:

23 November 2007 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:


Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


In one of the scenes on the convention floor, Dr. Larry Fleinhardt is shown having purchased several pieces of comic memorabilia, most notably a "Fone Bone" plush doll from the independent comic series "Bone" by Jeff Smith. See more »


Charlie Eppes: [reading the proof for Vanity Fair] His brother Don, a special agent in the Los Angelies office of the FBI believes Charles Epps has recently conquered the greatest challenge of friendship. 'Charlie and I has our issues growing up... '
Don Eppes: Yeh, to say the least.
Charlie Eppes: '... but if there is anything stronger than the bond between brothers its the bond between brothers who have become friends. Charlie's my friend'.
See more »

Crazy Credits

26 pages 183 panels of graphic art 1 rare ashcan edition 14 fakes See more »


References Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Poor excuse for a script
20 March 2011 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

Badly written episode. It logically failed on every level. First off, the writers seem to think that each comic book is the original art. They are not. They are far removed from the original art. The original art is copied, inked, photographed and shrunk down, colored and printed. There would be no reason to forge the artwork. If one wanted to create a forgery, one would scan the original and reprint it, not redraw it. Why would you need to redraw it?

A comic from 1962 is supposed to be the rarest and most valuable? WTF? The rarest comic books are going to be from the 1930s, not the 1960s. Why was there only one in existence? Since the stupid premise of this episode was that a comic had to be redrawn to be reprinted and there was only one copy in existence, how did the forger redraw it if he didn't have that sole copy? Did this not occur to any of the producers of the show or do they not care.

What was the point of placing the stolen original comic in the auction? I'm assuming it was to explain how the original was acquired which seems pretty thin to me. The simple action would have been to send the original to the artist's wife anonymously after the artist's death. No explanation required. Going along with the auction premise, the real stupidity was placing the original in the auction for them to buy. Why? They already had the original. Buy a forgery and later you could claim the original was the one you bought at the auction. Again, it makes zero sense. It's just embarrassingly bad.

Incredibly stupid episode and easily the worst episode of the series. It's just stunning that nobody seems to notice or care how badly written it was. My best guess is that an existing script dealing with art forgeries was lazily adapted and changed to comic books to make it more unique. A lot of the lapses in logic could then be explained away. Just awful!

For the record, I have never used the word 'stupid' more in a review than I did for this one.

1 of 10 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Robin and Amita - ruined all episodes? Sydney2011
Charlie's Driving Chickdoll3
Shows recommendations like Numb3rs? thenewgonzo
Bring back Numbers timothycward
IQ's of the characters Dexo-Fan
Discuss Graphic (2007) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: