| Index | 1 reviews in total |
1 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Should be intelligent, insightful and honest but instead is promotional and superficial, 4 December 2007
Author:
bob the moo
I'll be honest and say that I have only got one episode of this show to
base my opinion on and that, as much as I would like to see more to
round my view, it seems unlikely that I will get the chance to do so. I
saw the episode of this show that featured the film Half Nelson but the
approach was typical for the series. Essentially the makers are
introduced to a small audience who then watch the film in question then
engage in a question and answers session at the end. To my mind it
sounds like a good idea and in theory Half Nelson should have produced
some interesting questions because I did not expect it to be a film
that totally won over its audience 100%.
The problem with the Fabulous Picture Show is this, although the
structure suggests debate and unscripted dissension, the actual
delivery is surprisingly superficial and tame. Palmer is part of the
problem as creator and presenter; she is far too glossy and airy to
make the show anything other than that. The lack of really probing
questions is another issue for Half Nelson the questions were more
compliments with a "?" at the end rather than actually good questions.
Suddenly, before you even realise it is over, the show finishes and
Palmer stands with the makers looking for a quick sound bite, which she
managed to get from even that rather indie makers of Half Nelson! It is
a shame because you want this show to be the place where films don't
get the star struck, red carpet treatment but really there is no
evidence that this is anything other than another place to get
promotion. Like I say, a shame.
| Ratings | Official site | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |