The Nut House!! (TV Movie 1964) Poster

(1964 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Add a Review
2 ReviewsOrdered By: Helpfulness
1/10
Jay Ward, I forgive you ... barely.
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre17 February 2010
I saw one episode of "The Nut House!!" (why did it need TWO exclamation marks?) at the Museum of TV & Radio in NYC. The curator told me it was the only episode: I'm not sure if she meant the only episode in the museum's video archive, or the only episode ever made, full stop. I think it's both.

Producer Jay Ward and his partner Bill Scott, successful with cartoons and low-budget programming based on silent-film clips, were trying to succeed in live-action programming. "The Nut House!!" was intended as a Saturday daytime series, suitable for children and older audiences. If I'm not mistaken, only a pilot episode was made, and the pilot was never picked up for a series.

What struck me about "The Nut House!!" (besides its very low quality) is its similarity, before the fact, to "Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In" ... and I think I would have spotted this even if Alan Sues weren't present in both programmes. "The Nut House!!" consists of short skits and blackout gags, similar to "Laugh-In" but without the snappy pacing, flashy graphics and ensemble work (and good scripts) of that later, better-known show. "Laugh-In" was noted for political satire, and for topical jokes about recent events. "The Nut House!!" -- possibly because it was a pilot effort, with no specific air date -- trudges along with generic comedy about nothing in particular. Sort of like "Hee Haw" without the sophisticated urbanity.

I'm an undyingly loyal fan of Jay Ward's cartoons ... even his less funny ones, like "Tom Slick". But Ward's outrageous humour is totally absent here: an odd lapse, since Ward's cartoons -- unlike most other American cartoons -- relied very little on surrealistic impossible sight gags (that can't be done inexpensively in live action) and relied heavily on witty dialogue and characterisation that can be done easily in live action.

What I most recall about this unfunny black-and-white effort was the incredibly low budget. The camera is static: there are no sound cues and no lighting effects. At the end, the ensemble cast take a limp curtain call while each performer holds up a piece of paper with his or her name scrawled on it: a clear admission that the budget couldn't afford title supers.

Bob Arbogast, the credited co-scripter here, later wrote some hilarious song parodies with Stanley Ralph Ross. Too bad none of that hilarity made it into "The Nut House!!".

Jay Ward's name deserves to live in the annals of comedy forever ... but what I saw of "The Nut House!!" was awful. Even that double exclamation mark bothers me ... as if it were saying "We can't afford a good script or graphics, but we've got extra punctuation!!" There's a good premise lurking in this effort, but it didn't achieve its potential until the brilliant "Laugh-In" a few years later. Skip this low point in Jay Ward's career and enjoy some classic Bullwinkle toons instead.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
6/10
Spirited Attempt Has Its Moments . . .
odinthor-221 October 2012
Considered in the context of its era (early 60s), this vigorous effort by Jay Ward is certainly different and mildly zany. Ward was to some degree channeling Olsen & Johnson in the wackiness he was attempting. The cast members throw themselves into it whole-heartedly, and almost make it work. The fact that it was a pilot excuses its awkwardness--the ensemble still had to develop its chemistry. Yes, some skits go on too long, others don't have a satisfying payoff; but nevertheless it rivets the attention and makes for an entertaining half hour. (By the way, contrary to what one might read elsewhere, the end credits for the players are not on hand-held pieces of paper: the participants parade down the studio audience aisle Olsen & Johnson-like bearing "striker-type" signs indicating their names.) The Falcon monologue, delivered in hilarious deadpan, redeems the shortcomings of the rest. Watch this show with the eyes and entertainment-experience of the 1950s and early 1960s: The program is certainly worth seeing once, and maybe once again to see what one missed the first time.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews