| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Index | 75 reviews in total |
54 out of 64 people found the following review useful:
Well. a BETTER send off than ShowTime fgave it.., 5 February 2009
![]()
Author:
Justin McGill (mcgill_j@yahoo.com) from Oklahoma, USA
I thought Dead Like Me was one of the... funniest.. saddest..
smartest.. and just quirkiest shows ever on the air. This film takes
place, picking up 5 years later, where everyone left off.. mostly. Now
the biggest complain has been the absence of Rube (Mandy Patinkin) as
the boss.. a tragic loss to be sure. and the recasting of Sarah Wynter
in the role of Daisy Adair, formerly filled by Laura Harris. I will
only say.. not to give too much away.. but they got MOST of the cast
back.. and a pretty decent.. I won't say it is a definitive conclusion,
as it could be left open to more DTV films. But at least it felt there
was a punctuation at the end of the sentence which had been hanging for
almost half a decade.
I will be the first to admit the movie has its MAJOR problems.. but
over all, rough edges and everything.. it is a pretty decent
representation of what the best of the show offered, although not quite
as adeptly written, or acted.. its much harder to fill in a 90 minute
film with so many characters as opposed to a dozen hour episodes
yearly. This does seem more done for the "fans" who've missed the show.
and its still a welcome return, if not at its best.
62 out of 87 people found the following review useful:
Not as good as the show...but better than most movies & worth the time., 5 February 2009
![]()
Author:
y2john from vancouver canada
I have waited a year & 1/2 for this movie. So I was more than a bit
excited to finally see it.
I am happy to say, it was good. I would LIKE to have given it 10/10,
but, I don't think it was excellent.
It certainly takes the shows aspects & uses them well. It does a lot of
explaining at the start for newcomers, so you can at least try to
follow what was a 2 year TV program with some sense of logic.
First, let me pick at the things I didn't like. I was thrown off by
Georgia Lass (Ellen Muth) having a new voice in the starting scenes
(which were done to a comic book styling & I personally did not really
like...liked it even less when they used it again later in the program.
Its like they were trying to fill film space.). But once the show
started, her more familiar raspy (but not sounding like a 60 year
smoker like in the opening credits) voice seemed to come back. Also,
the idea that reapers never change appearance is hard to swallow when
Georgia clearly looks older than 18, and Daisy has changed noticeably.
The new "boss" Cameron Kane (Henry Ian Cusack) was annoying as hell, he
didn't catch on to me in any way & I quite admittedly was rooting for
his departure the whole way thru. He cant replace Rube, and it was one
of the shows biggest flaws in trying to replace him. No more Der Waffle
Haus, this was a staple of the show & if they do more movies, or bring
the show back, they have to recreate it. It was sorely missed. I didn't
like the new Happy Time, it looked too high end for HT. There is a
scene where Delores (Christna Willes) & Georgia are interviewing
someone with another co-worker, and its in a conference room that you
would envision in fortune 500 companies, instead of a temp agency.
Daisy Adair (Sarah Wynter...played by Laura Harris on the TV series)
was "good" but again, like Cameron/Rube, you cant replace the original
& in this case they literally tried to. Daisy suddenly has no southern
accent & seemed to go back to the shallow Daisy of the first few
episodes, instead of the complex Daisy of the later episodes.
Now, what worked. The cast still were able to pull off their roles to
perfection. Mason (Callum Blue) looked, acted and sounded like Mason
most of the time. His character showed no change & his idiotic
incompetent slacker mentality was placed in perfectly when needed. Roxy
(Jasmine Guy) was in fine form & showed even more attitude than she did
on many episodes of the show...which is great, since we are to believe
she has this ass kicking attitude, which only was shown a handful of
times in the series, here it was in almost every scene (except where
she meets the Police commissioner & oddly turns Daisy like for a
minute). Georgia was still great. Her dry sarcastic tone was a little
lighter in this, but its still there. Her interaction with her sister
was maybe too short (hey, 2 more scenes of that to build it up more
would of been great instead of cartoon drawings wasting film). Her
expression & words at the end of the episode were perfect as she is
showered in a downfall of post it notes. It also gives the viewers
overwhelming hope, that if there is another movie, or return of the
show that a much needed return may happen. It was both wonderful, and
frustrating to me. Wonderful in the hint that there could be a return.
Frustrating in the possible false hope, or worse yet, if there isn't
anymore episodes, no way to tie up that loose end. The supporting cast
of Delores & Joy (Cynthia Stevenson) were quite good when they had
screen time. Reggie (Britt McKillip) got more screen time than probably
ever before & she ran with it well. She has grown up, she has matured,
and she has developed a life. Of course, she is still haunted by her
sisters untimely death & when she is confronted with the possible death
of someone else she is close to, she is pulled back in after possibly
just finally getting on with her life. I always liked Reggies character
on the show, and was glad they gave her a lot more screen time here.
Her interactions with Joy & Georgia was terrific & really added to the
movie IMO. I was disappointed how little screen time was given to
Crystal (Crystal Dahl) as Happy Times mainstay receptionist, and the
fact there was no Kiffany at all.
The movie opened up as many doors as it closes. Which is good for
giving a new movie/return of the show room to move, but it is bad if
there is no more as many questions are again unanswered.
As an avid fan, I was going in, with high expectations & low hopes. I
was demanding excellence, since thats what the show always brought. But
I was fearful it wouldn't meet up to that level & be a giant dud. I am
pleased to say that it was good enough that it will make most DLM fans
happy. Could it be better? Yes. Could it have been worse, DEFINITELY.
It was most certainly worth the 87 minutes I spent watching it thru the
credits. Any DLM fan has to see it, if for no reason than to go down
memory lane & keep up to tabs if there is a resurrection of the show
(lets hope).
Hopefully the execs at MGM are taking notice of the great reviews its
getting everywhere & bring the show back.........with Rube & the
original Daisy.
59 out of 88 people found the following review useful:
A Disappointing Conclusion, 3 February 2009
![]()
Author:
Nick Young from Australia
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
If there is one thing that could be said of the television series of
Dead Like Me, it's that it was made great by it's superb characters and
a moving theme. Despite having a great premise, the plot was never the
strong point of the series, sometimes undermined by inconsistencies and
holes.
Now in 2009, Dead Like Me: Life After Death offers all of the same plot
inconsistencies but with none of the excellent characters which made us
fall in love with the original series. The characters in the film are
extremely shallow, and altogether unfaithful to their originals. Of the
original team of reapers who made it to this film (George, Roxy, Mason,
Daisy), all but George are condensed in to a few clichés. In fact the
presence of these characters only serves as a function of nostalgia, as
their contribution to the story has been mangled and broken beyond
comprehension.
The main story is told through George and Reggie, whose paths become
intertwined after Reggie's secret boyfriend is critically injured in a
road accident. The heart of the story explores the relationship between
the sisters as George's identity is uncovered and Reggie reveals her
true feelings towards the boy. There is a sub-plot involving the other
reapers and the shady new head reaper Cameron, but it reads more like a
collection of ideas and events than a cohesive story. After squeezing
all of these ideas in to the short screen time, you're left with a
sub-plot which is underdeveloped, inadequately explained and ultimately
shallow. The Happy Time sections were as pointless as they were
unnecessary, highlighting a failed attempt to incorporate Delores'
character in to an already disjoint storyline.
The absence of Rube's character is tangible whilst watching the film.
To make matters worse, the beginning of the film draws attention to his
absence, only to abandon it a quarter of the way in. This only serves
to emphasise his absence.
George's character is a mostly faithful reproduction from the series.
However, a lack of character development diminishes her significance in
the story. Despite being the main character, I'm left with a feeling
that George's only purpose in this story was to play the supporting
role for her sister.
Reggie's character has changed significantly from the original series.
In fact one could be forgiven for mistaking the now 18 year old Britt
McKillip as an entirely different actress. The once gawky, confused and
insecure girl is replaced by a teenager who is just plain insecure.
Despite this, it feels like an acceptable continuation of the original
character. Ultimately, Dead Like Me: Life After Death is about the
evolution of Reggie's character and her ability to finally accept the
reality, inevitability and absoluteness of death. If it's closure from
the series that you seek in this film, then it is at least granted to
Reggie's character with moderate success.
Overall, Dead Like Me: Life After Death comes across as a disjointed
set of events and ideas, lacking cohesion, direction and purpose. If
you seek nostalgia then you will be disappointed by this film. If you
seek closure then you will be disappointed by this film. It does
however have an extremely cryptic ending, lending itself to the
possibility of a sequel or new series. Unfortunately, I just can't
escape the feeling that the golden goose is dead.
29 out of 36 people found the following review useful:
Fan of the Series? Then Skip This., 24 June 2009
![]()
Author:
Bob Fingerman from New York City
After reading a few bad reviews of 'Dead Like Me: Life After Death', I
was prepared for something not very good. What I got was like watching
a necrophiliac having his way with the corpse of that wonderful show.
How Stephen Godchaux and John Masius, both regular writers on the
series, could seemingly have so little connection to everything that
made that series special is a deep mystery (and I don't feel good
slagging this off, as I've enjoyed their work in the past).
Where the series had been original, lively, funny, poignant and quirky
(in the good way, which is a rarity), this thing is irritating, boring,
not even remotely amusing and feels disrespectful and opportunistic.
The threadbare plot involving a callow replacement for the sadly absent
Rube (performed with subtlety and wit in the series by Mandy Patinkin)
is a bust that never goes anywhere or even resolves itself. That Rube's
substitute is a man who was killed in the World Trade Center on 9/11 is
in particularly bad taste, especially since it adds nothing to his
character, who is a miserable creep; it's just a weird throwaway. The
replacement of series original Laura Harris, as Daisy Adair, is also a
major trouble spot. Sarah Wynter, in a word, is awful. Harris's Daisy
was imbued with a knowing sadness under her surface superficiality.
Wynter just devours the scenery playing Daisy as a vapid, talentless
idiot.
It's nice that talented original cast members Ellen Muth, Callum Blue,
Jasmine Guy, et al, got work, but they deserved a better vehicle than
this shoddy, mawkish mess.
If you are a fan of the Showtime series, do yourself a favor and skip
this. Once you've watched it you can't un-watch it and doing so will
only make you mourn anew the premature death of the original. Which, I
suppose, is apt.
34 out of 46 people found the following review useful:
It's OK, 18 February 2009
![]()
Author:
matix_d from Canada
While it was nice to see the return of the show, this reeked of
Straight to DVD production value.
The excessive use of slow-mo and transitional effects were annoying to
me, the original series just had a more polished feel to it.
The story line was OK, while it was good they tied up the absence of
Rube. His general presence was missed, he kept everyone grounded.
In all honesty this movie has lost some of the charm of the series that
made it quirky and dark. I am not saying it's bad, I just think they
could have done so much better with how long this has been in
production.
And to anyone who may quip that I am looking to find fault I watched
the series when it had it's run on TV and bought the DVD's when they
came out. I love the series as much as the next person and I want to
see it picked up again but not at the expense of the story and the
ideals that made the series what it was.
36 out of 53 people found the following review useful:
Fun and satisfying followup to a great show, 17 February 2009
![]()
Author:
jlpicard-3 from United States
I'm a fan of the original show, so reading the (rather negative)
reviews here at IMDb I had very low expectations for _Dead Like Me:
Life After Death_. I mean -- no Rube? A different Daisy? George looks
different? Why should I even bother to rent this? But I did -- and I'm
happy to report that _DLM:LAD_ is a really good movie, *much* better
than you'd think reading about it here. The stuff that I thought would
bug me (no Rube etc) didn't matter at all. There are two major plot
lines and both are engaging and well-written. Without giving anything
away, one of the plots involves George's mom and sister; I always
thought the "George's family" segments dragged in the original show,
but in the movie George's sister Reggie has grown up and she brightens
the screen whenever she appears. The writing is good and a couple of
lines had me on the floor ("je ne sais quoi"), plus there are a number
of "we always wanted to see *that*!" moments which I won't spoil for
you.
Yes, George looks older but her new look grew on me pretty quickly. If
I had to make one change, I'd have added more exposition about Crystal,
but maybe some things are never meant to be known.
In short: thumbs up, a good movie following up on a wonderful show.
22 out of 29 people found the following review useful:
it's over, people, 31 May 2009
![]()
Author:
sophiej468 from Northern California
as every DLM fan knows,things change. There comes a time to let it go, don't look back, move on. It's just a shame that the amateurs got hold of this, since they clearly don't understand what reaping is all about or what any reasonable end to this story would be. Actually, they do get it in their handling of Mandy Patinkin's unavailability to replay Rube, but apparently they weren't listening to themselves or they would have known how to deal with the absence of Laura Harris. Sarah Wynter is probably a perfectly nice person and decent actress but she is not the Daisy we came to love/hate. not even close. Henry Cusick as the new head reaper is as slimy as the script wants him to be, but what kind of warped sensibility wanted him to be that? It's lovely to see the grown up Britt McKillip, and making un-George a whole lot more attractive should have been done in the first place. Otherwise, nothing to see here, move along.
20 out of 29 people found the following review useful:
A Good Movie Haunted by Its Series, 17 February 2009
![]()
Author:
Vincent Black from United States
I guess one could label me a fan of this series, since I own both
season 1 and 2 DVD box sets and today I purchased this movie. However I
am not here to put frosting on the cake. Any TV series is better than
the movie from any point of view. Take into consideration that the
writers can afford a few episodes that fail over a two year season. One
tends to remember the great episodes and push aside the crappy the
ones. So in a nutshell you cannot compare any movie to the series.
I was happy to see they managed to get about 80% of the original cast
back after 5 years of doing nothing. I enjoyed the movie but it lacked
revelations. There was no cosmic secrets answered about the show. It
merely asked more questions and some to most of the characters seemed
to take a back seat. I was hoping they would use the opportunity to
expand on the "Reaper Society" and I kind of thought that was where the
plot was heading but somehow failed to push through.
The focus of the film is on Georgia and Reggie and unfortunately
characters like Mason, Roxy, and Daisy become less significant than
they should be in this film. The subplot with Cameron Kane wasn't well
developed and makes the movie fall short of the mark.
So why did I give the move a seven out of ten? That in my honest
opinion is a "C" average. It is just OK but could have been better.
Sadly due to the nature of the story that reapers never grow old they
won't be able to make another. The actress Ellen Muth is showing her
age. I sincerely hope she can move on to better roles but I am afraid
she will always be haunted by the series and movie.
28 out of 47 people found the following review useful:
i'm not sure what the studio was trying to do..., 4 February 2009
Author:
imizrahi2002 from Netherlands
ideally, it would be that they were trying to tie up loose ends left when the show was canceled...but i guess that would be a bit too much to ask... there are so many shows that, when they get gone, leave the viewers with little to no resolution. or, if you're from California...closure. 'deadwood' and 'john from cincinnati' come readily to mind... so when i saw that these people had made a movie i thought, 'great. a studio that cares about its audience...'. maybe. maybe not. personally, i would've rather they made no follow up than a foul up... there's LOTS of things that are, at best, unsatisfactory about this project. first off, for me, was the 'new' daisy adair...easily one of the most dynamic characters of the show, though a 'latecomer'...and boy, if people want to see the difference a good actress makes, they need look no further than here...i imagine the actress that played daisy saw this as a good opportunity to, pardon the pun, make a killing... seems the studio decided they didn't need her THAT badly. bad decision... but it would seem that's only one of many... see this if you must. just don't get your hopes up. or you did like me...
11 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
A Decent Epitaph for Dead Like Me, 15 March 2009
![]()
Author:
C G from United States
Dead Like Me: Life After Death, is a good entry into the series. Though
not quite as fun or engaging as the series was, it was quite enjoyable
to see the characters again, and how they have all grown, matured, and
subtly changed. It felt a bit restrained in comparison to the episodes
which had a bit more energy and emotional content. However, the quality
of dialog, special effects, and visual design are all very good.
Surely, this film won't be as enjoyable to individuals who are not
familiar with the series, as they won't perceive the subtle character
differences, and certainly won't understand why the reaper team is so
frustrated with the new team leader of Cameron Kane. Nor will neophytes
to the series pick up on the fact that George's mom has also grown and
matured significantly, or why it was such a big deal that she reveals
her secret to her sister. And despite the fact that they did an
excellent job of introducing "the world" that the story is built upon,
the significance of Der Waffle Haus, Happy Time, and even Murray the
cat, are all lost.
Overall, it was a satisfying experience, and yet leaves me regretting
the series was canceled so prematurely. Dead Like Me was such a
refreshing show, with its dark humor, yet its light and happy sadness.
The ensemble cast, weird deaths, and character arcs, are all sorely
missed. In fact, I canceled my Showtime subscription when I heard they
had canceled the show. I hope there are additional installments into
the franchise, but I fear that this is it. And if that is the case, it
was a satisfying way to tie it up, unlike the unceremonious cut it
received five years ago.
| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| External reviews | Parents Guide | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |