Nagagutsu sanjûshi (1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Perrault meets Eastwood... and it's NOT a good thing.
webkroozer26 May 2009
After watching the original 'Nagagutsu Wo Haita Neko' on DVD (a most amazing and entertaining effort I was lucky to see at the theater as a child) and getting my hands on its sequel, Nagagutsu Sanjushi, I had great expectations... which eventually were shattered, quickly and mercilessly.

First of all, the title is erroneous as 'Nagagutsu Sanjushi' translates as '3 Musketeers in Boots', mainly because the 3 cat antagonists who hunted Pero down in the first film are here too and they are actually the bad guys. Add the use of a western setting and the absence of any element related to Alexander Dumas' novel and the name for the movie is pretty confusing already.

The animation is decent but the bland character design and colors (way different from the ones in Puss 'N' Boots 1) quickly take away from it. I just couldn't connect with this Pero. In the original he was bold, witty and resourceful. Here he is mostly a bumbling pushover and the plot twist near the end is dumb and unbelievable, even for an animated feature.

Toei took a major step back with this well-meaning yet inferior film which tried to expand the universe and exploits of Charles Perrault's famous feline hero. Not bad, but not the best either... definitely the weakest entry in the Puss 'N' Boots trilogy. I suggest you see the original or its second sequel (Puss 'N' Boots Around the World in 80 Days) which returns to the winning formula and manages to recapture the magic and charm not found in this one.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
it has bad writing, but has potential
diluiscmx29 March 2024
So like first of all the whole western theme and stuff. Why do they want to shove it to the audience's face that it's a western movie? And pero was such a jerk in the movie towards jimmy, like it feels he lost his charm that made him likeable in the first movie. Basically pero isn't even a main character but more like a side character, the only thing he ACTUALLY does to the plot is at the end, which is depressing.

But the story is good, but badly explained, like the whole Mexican fake money thing, annie's dad death, the whole gun shi, that shi good, but it's ruined by the GOD DAMN SINGING MICE AND THE WHOLE "western restaurant" THING. The movie is WAY TOO SHORT and it feels rushed. Anyways this movie is good but need more potencial. (this looks like a karen yelp review im so done 😭)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed