I decided to rent Stripper Academy because I knew someone who appeared. I've seen hundreds of movies over the years and some darn bad ones too. But this movie has to be near the bottom. The lighting was terrible, the sound was worse and the screenplay/plot was nonsensical and badly put together. There was a car wash in a neighborhood's cul-de-sac with prison escapees driving up? Say what? The over-weight stripper was way over the top. I actually felt bad for her that Director/actor Vince would exploit her. Vince seemed more interested in the gratuitous sexual action around him than making a competent movie. In one word, I would rate this movie, "yech!"
5 Reviews
omg.
mvieira-c2 September 2009
I was shocked with the nonsense in this movie. The whole thing just isn't real, it's absurd. I think that throughout the entire movie they only played one song...it would be understandable if it was a good one, but come on! How is this topic interesting enough to even make a movie out of it? Did they seriously think it would be a huge success?! I mean... This is the first comment I am making and for one simple reason: this movie is not worth seeing. And for so many reasons! The cast is miserable, the theme even worst and not to mention the way things take its course in it! It's a promiscuous film. Hated it and do not recommend you guys watch it! Congrats on the making of such a bad movie!
Not sexy and definitely not amusing
Red-Barracuda11 September 2009
Who would have thought that a movie featuring countless semi-naked ladies could be so boring? Stripper Academy achieves this remarkable distinction. It's one of those rare films where you can't even say, 'it sure sucked but at least there was plenty of nude women'. While there certainly are a lot of strippers in this, the only routine that seemed at all erotic was the one given by the professional pole dancer to the academy pupils. She was hot and she knew what she was doing but otherwise the movie seems to be full of unsexy routines and painful comedy. It never fails to amaze me that people actually write screenplays as awful as this and then have them made into movies. Seriously, Stripper Academy makes Police Academy look like Goodfellas; where Police Academy had a character who could make all manner of noises with his voice, Stripper Academy has an obese woman who farts constantly. It's unbelievable.
There's only so much you can expect from a film called Stripper Academy I guess. However, this film doesn't work on any level. I wouldn't expect you to be entertained by this.
There's only so much you can expect from a film called Stripper Academy I guess. However, this film doesn't work on any level. I wouldn't expect you to be entertained by this.
No TNA well a bit of T
robhiengler19 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Glad I scanned through this for free out of my friends bargain bucket as I would have felt mugged if I had to pay to watch this utter exploitive tripe.
This film puts Vincent Foster as one of my friend's leading contenders for the new Ed Wood (hence why he got it I suppose) whom {Vincent Foster} incidentally appears to be the unfunny, wooden acting, lovechild of Will Ferell and Brad Garrett.
Watching some impotent director/writer stroking his ego by making out with semi-naked (and more semi than naked) "actresses" is funny for about 30 seconds and that's basically the premise of the film - Vincent Foster letching after nubile women who mostly don't even get topless. I mean come on strippers strip - right? Showgirls had more nudity than this in 5 seconds, hell even John Carpenter has more nudity in his films and he doesn't put "stripper" in the title.
That's how bad this film is and its a wonder that anyone bankrolled this film. In fact, in a way I have a tiny modicum of respect for Vincent Foster for being able to "acquire" money for this movie solely based on the plot being: "yeah its me macking with some women".
Give this one a miss and all his other films while your at it.
This film puts Vincent Foster as one of my friend's leading contenders for the new Ed Wood (hence why he got it I suppose) whom {Vincent Foster} incidentally appears to be the unfunny, wooden acting, lovechild of Will Ferell and Brad Garrett.
Watching some impotent director/writer stroking his ego by making out with semi-naked (and more semi than naked) "actresses" is funny for about 30 seconds and that's basically the premise of the film - Vincent Foster letching after nubile women who mostly don't even get topless. I mean come on strippers strip - right? Showgirls had more nudity than this in 5 seconds, hell even John Carpenter has more nudity in his films and he doesn't put "stripper" in the title.
That's how bad this film is and its a wonder that anyone bankrolled this film. In fact, in a way I have a tiny modicum of respect for Vincent Foster for being able to "acquire" money for this movie solely based on the plot being: "yeah its me macking with some women".
Give this one a miss and all his other films while your at it.
Stupid, sleazy & aimless.
DigitalRevenantX713 October 2013
Story Synopsis: An account of life in a fictitious institution where hot women go to train on how to become strippers. The owner has a terminal case of 'roving eye', the horny janitor gets paid in lap dances & the recruits come in all shapes & sizes. But fate conspires to bring bad luck to the joint. Can the sexy ladies come out on top?
Film Synopsis: This low-budget comedy is one of the stupidest films to come out of the independent film industry in the past decade. It does have one thing in its favour – the various strip dances & topless ladies prove to be mildly entertaining while director / scribe / producer / star Vincent Foster does his best impression as a guy who is battling a weakness for women (watch out for Richard Tyson as a spaced-out VIP).
But while watching Stripper Academy, you come to notice that the various strip dances are all there is to the film. There is no plot (at least nothing even vaguely resembling one) & the comedy elements are so clumsy that you won't be laughing very much, if at all. The humour is so LCD that those with moral standards will be switching off long before we get to the finale. The film is aimless & the story has no sense of direction. The humour is also very un-PC, with Amanda Lynne's fat stripper coming with a constant barrage of fart sounds.
Film Synopsis: This low-budget comedy is one of the stupidest films to come out of the independent film industry in the past decade. It does have one thing in its favour – the various strip dances & topless ladies prove to be mildly entertaining while director / scribe / producer / star Vincent Foster does his best impression as a guy who is battling a weakness for women (watch out for Richard Tyson as a spaced-out VIP).
But while watching Stripper Academy, you come to notice that the various strip dances are all there is to the film. There is no plot (at least nothing even vaguely resembling one) & the comedy elements are so clumsy that you won't be laughing very much, if at all. The humour is so LCD that those with moral standards will be switching off long before we get to the finale. The film is aimless & the story has no sense of direction. The humour is also very un-PC, with Amanda Lynne's fat stripper coming with a constant barrage of fart sounds.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
