Up 7,269 this week

Home (I) (2009)

Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.6/10 from 16,681 users   Metascore: 47/100
Reviews: 43 user | 25 critic | 4 from

With aerial footage from fifty-four countries, 'Home' is a depiction of how Earth's problems are all interlinked.

Watch Trailer
0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 38 titles
created 22 Aug 2011
a list of 37 titles
created 21 Oct 2011
a list of 46 titles
created 27 Dec 2012
a list of 24 titles
created 25 Feb 2013
a list of 33 titles
created 22 Oct 2013

Related Items

Search for "Home" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Home (2009)

Home (2009) on IMDb 8.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Home.

User Polls

2 wins & 1 nomination. See more awards »





Credited cast:
Yann Arthus-Bertrand ...
Narrator (voice)
Narrator (voice)
Narrator (voice)


With aerial footage from fifty-four countries, 'Home' is a depiction of how Earth's problems are all interlinked.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


A Stunning Visual Portrayal of Earth


Not Rated | See all certifications »




| | | |

Release Date:

5 June 2009 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Boomerang  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


(edited) | (DVD) | (DVD) | (long)

Sound Mix:



Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Released worldwide on June 5th, 2009 - World Environment Day - simultaneously in cinemas, on television, on DVD and on the Internet. See more »


The word "climatic" is often said by the narrator as "climactic". See more »


Narrator: We are destroying the cycle of a life that was given to us.
See more »


Edited into Lucy (2014) See more »


Cum Dederit
Performed by Sandrine Piau
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Eye-opening and beautiful- but sadly not perfect
22 March 2010 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

First of all I am relieved that a movie on this subject has been produced with such a high budget. It's about time someone really tried to sum up what the human condition is, and the relationship between our condition and the condition of our planet.

The visuals for 'Home' are for the most part near perfect- pinpointing the beauties and miracles of this world, whilst also the disgraces and disasters with a total sensitivity and respect for all sides of the issue. The subjects covered are well chosen and diverse, and you really get perspective on how widespread and potentially devastating our manipulation of the natural world has become.

Unfortunately though, what slightly let this movie down for me was its 'matter of fact' approach, and a lack of attention to some important details. In some ways this film avoids a one-sided approach, with interesting stats showing how our attempts at alternative fuels have their own negative effects, but for the first section particularly it felt like some very dated notes on the history of the earth. We know some amazing things about the history of our planet but it's important to recognise that there is far more that we don't. I for one stand firmly on the side of science that can admit to not knowing. The most blatant error, as picked up by IMDb in the 'goofs' section, is the narration that the first towns appeared 600 years ago- how could you get that wrong!!? Apparently they meant to say 6000 years ago, but even this isn't fact as there is evidence of towns up to over 8000 years ago. On top of this it is continually stated that human beings have been around for 200'000 years, a theory that has been far from proved and therefore should be treated as such. I think that in a film that is trying to be scientifically credible, in this case vague/speculative language would possibly be more accurate. At least they managed to avoid a '2001: A Space Odyssey' style chimpanzee scene! Scientific stuff aside though, the most inexcusable error is that in the fairly small amount of on screen text there are numerous spelling mistakes. In most cases that doesn't bother me, but in a high budget film production it does, and it certainly doesn't help the reputation of the Eco-warriors (hippies come to mind!)

After watching this movie though, I'll admit that I had mostly forgotten the flaws because it really forces you to think about the issues. This is a good thing, and for the most part it is done with beauty, sensitivity and grace, which is why I've given it such a high rating. Watch this movie- the cinematography and well crafted narrative will open your eyes to the fragile state of our planet and cause you to appreciate your place in it more. Just don't be a sucker for the slightly anti-human philosophy.

13 of 19 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
to people who have seen the movie... wabl
Mistakes someone31337
More Social Engineering... jodashphoenix
Eyecandy nothing more. huibie88
It is not about the planet... yorgos_v
Heavily ispired by Koyaanisqatsi, Baraka etc etc. konitzlee
Discuss Home (2009) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: