Doctor Who: Season 3, Episode 4

Daleks in Manhattan (21 Apr. 2007)

TV Episode  |  TV-PG  |   |  Adventure, Drama, Family
7.1
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.1/10 from 2,412 users  
Reviews: 7 user | 7 critic

The Doctor and Martha travel to New York in 1930, where people have been mysteriously vanishing from the streets, and an old enemy resurfaces.

Director:

Writers:

, (characters: "Daleks"), 1 more credit »
0Check in
0Share...

Watch Now

From $1.99 on Amazon Instant Video

ON DISC

Interview: Magic Mike

The Magic Mike XXL guys give some relationship advice to a 74-year-old fan.

Watch Now

Related News

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 39 titles
created 23 Sep 2012
 
a list of 14 titles
created 04 Sep 2013
 
a list of 22 titles
created 20 Nov 2013
 
a list of 42 titles
created 11 months ago
 
a list of 14 titles
created 10 months ago
 

Related Items

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Daleks in Manhattan (21 Apr 2007)

Daleks in Manhattan (21 Apr 2007) on IMDb 7.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Doctor Who.
« Previous Episode | 32 of 146 Episodes | Next Episode »

Videos

Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
...
Eric Loren ...
Flik Swan ...
Myrna
...
Lois
Earl Perkins ...
Man #1
...
Man #2
...
Foreman
Joe Montana ...
Worker #1
...
Worker #2
Mel Taylor ...
Dock Worker
Edit

Storyline

This is the first of a two part story, it is set in 1930's New York. The Doctor and Martha arrive in New York, there is, however, trouble as the Daleks return once again, this time attempting to create a Dalek/Human hybrid creature in the New York sewers! These two episodes also see the return of the Dalek Sec and the Cult of Skaro. Written by Brantyman

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

21 April 2007 (UK)  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (50 episodes)

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Mr Diagoras, meanwhile, was named for the fifth century BC Greek poet, Diagoras the Atheist. See more »

Goofs

While in the sewers talking to Martha, Frank claims to be from Tennessee, but his accent is wrong for that region. It is closer to being a Texas accent, but it is obviously an affectation. See more »

Quotes

The Doctor: They survived, they always survive, while I lose everything...
Tallulah: The metal thing? What was it?
The Doctor: It's called a Dalek. And it's not just metal, it's alive.
Tallulah: You're kidding me.
The Doctor: Do I look like I'm kidding? Inside that shell, there's a creature born to hate... whose only thought is to destroy everything and everyone that isn't a Dalek too. It won't stop until it's killed every human being alive.
Tallulah: But if that's not a human being, that kinda' implies... it's from outer space.
[beat]
Tallulah: Yet again, that's a no ...
See more »

Connections

Featured in Doctor Who Confidential: Space Craft (2007) See more »

Soundtracks

My Angel Put The Devil In Me
(uncredited)
Written by Murray Gold
Performed by Miranda Raison
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Daleks For The Sake Of It
21 July 2008 | by (Isle Of Bute , Scotland) – See all my reviews

There's a common myth that DOCTOR WHO is " The show with the Daleks in it " . Yes the show did feature Daleks from 1963-1989 but Daleks aren't the be all and end all of the programme . In fact when you think about it the most highly regarded seasons among fans , five ( 1968 ) seven ( 1970 ) , thirteen (1975-76 ) and fourteen ( 1976-77 ) haven't featured any Dalek stories at all . The reverse is also true with stories such as The Chase , Death To The Daleks and Destiny Of The Daleks held in very low regard by the fans . It's somewhat annoying when producers bring back the Daleks for the sake of it and this certainly applies to this story .

It's not just the return of the Daleks that's so underdeveloped -it's the entire script which has a lack of thought . In fact there's something painfully inconsistent with every scene . For example Soloman ( This week's token black character )talks about his time in The Great War and the need for sticking together but seeing as the American army was segregated until 1947 would such a character be aware of a need to be sticking together ? It'd be more logical and credible if he was bitter and anti assimilation . In an early scene he takes back a loaf of bread that'd been stolen and breaks it in half and gives half of it to the rightful owner and the thief . Is that moral ? I guess because his name is Soloman there's a biblical reference there somewhere but again there's a lack of credibility , same as it's pushed down the viewers throat of how hungry and poverty stricken the people are in Central Park then when they'r offered a chance of work most of these unemployed , hungry and poverty stricken people turn it down

You also have to ask yourself why is it the Daleks have decided to locate to New York in 1930 ? Despite the poverty caused by the Wall Steet crash America was still a capitalist democracy with a free press and where people were allowed to ask questions . Wouldn't the Daleks have been better off in Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Soviet Union ? Indeed with the dubious success of Stalin's five year plans it would be far more logical to have set the story there and have the character of Diagoras as a high ranking commissar who doesn't tolerate dissent , but I guess Daleks In The Gulag doesn't have the same ring to it

Director James Strong does his very best with the weak material , but there's a fly in the ointment and that is the " Noo Yoirk accents " . They are absolutely terrible and a great distraction . Likewise much of the dialogue such as " Laszlo was da smartest guy oi ever dated " . Strong does however make sewers look like sewers which is not often the case in the history of the show ( Attack Of The Cybermen being an example ) and he does pace the impact aesthetic of the cliffhanger very well . It's just a pity that the Radio Times gave away the episode ending with a front page photo


23 of 36 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
I just can't buy Capaldi, does season 8 improve? nacham81
Capaldi teases Series 9.... danpink14-140-731243
Doctor Who has only REALLY been 'reinvented' twice... sn939
Gus erikemiller-985-640391
Why all the Moffat hate? themeckielove
Steven Moffat On Dealing With Showrunner Hate NineTenElevenTwelve
Discuss Daleks in Manhattan (2007) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?