MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 106,970 this week

The Man Who Shot Chinatown: The Life and Work of John A. Alonzo (2007)

6.2
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.2/10 from 73 users  
Reviews: 5 user | 3 critic

Add a Plot

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Picks: October

IMDb's editors share the movies and TV shows they are excited to see in October.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 2344 titles
created 25 Jul 2012
 
a list of 214 titles
created 02 Jan 2013
 
a list of 6103 titles
created 19 Sep 2013
 
list image
a list of 7 titles
created 4 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Man Who Shot Chinatown: The Life and Work of John A. Alonzo (2007)

The Man Who Shot Chinatown: The Life and Work of John A. Alonzo (2007) on IMDb 6.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
John A. Alonzo ...
Himself (archive footage)
...
Himself
...
Himself
...
Himself
...
Herself
...
Himself
...
Himself
...
Himself (archive footage)
Martin Ritt ...
Himself (archive footage)
...
Himself
...
Himself
...
Himself
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

The Life and work of John Alonzo, one of the greatest cinematographers of cinema


Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

| |

Release Date:

15 November 2007 (Germany)  »

Also Known As:

A férfi, aki a Kínai negyedet fényképezte  »

Filming Locations:


Box Office

Budget:

€500,000 (estimated)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Features Chinatown (1974) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

interesting
30 August 2011 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

The work of the film cameraman is something that always carries a special interest for me. Their contributions to films are often, at the same time, underrated and overrated. Now while I admire the efforts that went into the making of this documentary I cannot enthuse over their choice of subject matter.

Mr Alonzo was a good, basic cameraman but not more than that. He was competent while not artistic, hard-working but not that interesting. Many cameramen of his generation went for easy gimmickry in their visuals instead of grounding their work in the best principles of motion picture photography. For example, placing yellow filters over the lens to suggest a 1940s (or historical) ambiance is something that many of these copycat DPs would do, but that isn't artistic cinematography. It is gimmickry. Often provided with photogenic background sets Mr Alonzo would light them not in the best interests of the story but merely to engage in display of visual pyrotechnics.

The producers of this documentary could have chosen so many more accomplished cinematographers as their subject. There are great names out there crying for a documentary like this: Robert Burks, Franz Planer, Robert Krasker, Arthur Miller, Joe August, Wilkie Cooper, Winton Hoch, Freddy Young, Osmond Borrodaile, Bert Glennon to name but a few. If we are going to try to encourage artistry in camera-work then we should be studying the artists.

Interesting documentary, but they could have chosen a more worthy subject.


1 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Contribute to This Page