18 user 19 critic

Sarah Landon and the Paranormal Hour (2007)

1:59 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $2.99 on Amazon Video

A 17-year-old girl has mysterious encounters with paranormal activity in the small town of Pine Valley.



(screenplay), (story) | 1 more credit »





Credited cast:
Kurt Braun ...
Triston Coleman ...
Young David
David Baker
Matt Baker
Rick Comrie ...
Johnny Woods
Alessandra Daniele ...
Young Sarah
Nicole Des Coteaux ...
Mary Ann Baker
Patricia Dimeo ...
Vera Waters
Joe Momma Ernst ...
Male House Shopper
Ronda Ernst ...
Female House Shopper
Michael A. Evans ...
Lee Baker
Geof Gibson ...
Kevin Guild ...
Ben Woods


In San Diego, Sarah Landon is invited by her grandmother's friend, Thelma Shaw, to spend the weekend with her in Pine Valley, California. Sarah used to spend vacations there during her childhood with her recently-deceased friend Megan. While heading to Pine Valley, her car breaks down and Carlos, the mechanic, calls his assistant, Matt Baker, to give her a ride. Sarah knows Matt from her childhood and asks about his older brother, David. Meanwhile Carlos tells a sad story about their uncle, Ben Woods. He apparently used to brag about his only son, Johnny, considered by Ben to be the best baseball player in the Valley. On his twenty-first birthday, Ben's sister Mary Ann Baker decided to celebrate with Johnny but she had a car accident and the teenager died. Ben promised to kill David Baker on his twenty-first birthday and he dies on the day of Johnny's funeral. Over the years, Mary Ann becomes delusional and has a breakdown. During an argument between his mother and father, David ... Written by Claudio Carvalho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

character name in title | See All (1) »


Sometimes the past comes back to haunt you. See more »

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG for thematic elements, mild peril and language

Parents Guide:



Official Sites:



Release Date:

19 October 2007 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:


Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$586,283 (USA) (19 October 2007)


$817,935 (USA) (26 October 2007)

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

(Dolby 5.1)


Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Nice job!
22 October 2007 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

We had seen the commercials for this movie on Nickelodeon, and my 11-year-old son thought it looked good and wanted to see it. I was curious after reading that the movie was shot on DVCProHD format and was apparently a low-budget family affair. I too have been a part of such productions, and I wanted to see how a movie like this fared on the big screen. I took my son and two of his friends-- 3 boys, ages 11, 11, and 10. They loved the movie! Walking out of the theatre, they were amazed, talking about their favorite parts, and how scary it was. Sure, some critics have lambasted it. But it was a hit with the target tween audience I saw it with. It's a very enjoyable mystery involving the paranormal, set up in a way that's complex but followable (maybe a bit too complex? I thought so at first, but in retrospect it all worked-- complexity just means you have to pay attention and engage your brain-- is that a bad thing?) and it has a logic that holds up and pays off in a satisfying way in the end. I believe the cause of the negative reactions in some of the other commenters here, as well as those of the professional critics, could be that in an intelligent story like this, much of the exposition and key plot points must be conveyed through dialogue and acting, and the subtleties of the acting craft are crucial. But, when you're on a budget, really good, experienced actors are hard to come by. But like I said, any sub-par acting didn't hinder my son's enjoyment of the film. He and his friends were not comparing it to Harry Potter, or any other film for that matter. The lead actress was very good. It's no small feat to carry a movie, and she did it nicely. Directing and cinematography were fine. Nothing screamed low-budget, and any noticeable differences in the "look" of the movie due to the DVCProHD format were not problematic, and really no more extensive than, say, 16mm blown up to 35mm. Of course, the kids (again, the target audience) didn't know the difference. There was a little graininess in a couple of dark interior scenes-- be we've all seen that in shot-on-film horror movies, so it didn't detract. Overall, a good job, and I applaud the filmmakers and distributor for taking the chance and bringing this movie to the big screen.

21 of 33 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
for those who have seen this dreamgrl-1
JUST CURIOUS... mevans-19
The Comrie Family? jimclemente
any good? SweeneyNate
This looks... andy-evans-8706
This looks like a Goosebumps Episode fallen1617

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: