In 2004, political bloggers came of age. They propelled Howard Dean from fringe candidate to front-runner. They took on CBS anchor Dan Rather and won. As the 2006 mid-term elections ... See full summary »




Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?



Credited cast:
Bob Adams ...
Connecticut Bob
Beau Anderson ...
John Aravosis ...
Keith Crane ...
Jane Hamsher ...
John Hinderaker ...
Charles Johnson ...
Ned Lamont ...
Michelle Malkin ...
Markos Moulitsas ...
Tom Swan ...
Tom Swan
Tim Tagaris ...


In 2004, political bloggers came of age. They propelled Howard Dean from fringe candidate to front-runner. They took on CBS anchor Dan Rather and won. As the 2006 mid-term elections approached, bloggers were preparing for battle again. This documentary examines how online democratic activism is shaping important elections by focusing on the decisive Connecticut senate race and Ned Lamont's challenge to incumbent Joe Lieberman. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis








Release Date:

28 December 2006 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs



See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A New Hope...
12 October 2008 | by (Clearwater Fl) – See all my reviews

Blog Wars is a surprisingly tight documentary that focuses on the Ned Lamont/ Joe Lieberman fight for the Democratic Primary in CT. It also touches other blogger wins most noticeably the Dan Rather fiasco with the fake George Bush National Guard Memos.

The film also wisely allows critics of the bloggers to chime in such as Andrew Sullivan and Christopher Hitchens.

For a film that focuses most of its running time on the liberal bloggers on the Lamont side it surprisingly is somewhat critical of them. Many come across as a political version of that guy who learned to speak Klingon and dresses up in full Star Fleet Regalia.

The two bloggers that are the films focus are Markos Moulitsas (Daily Kos) and Jane Hamsher (Firedoglake) don’t come across any better than the rabble. When Christopher Hitchins says that the bloggers are self centered Markos (Complete with a speech coach... WTF?) certainly will pop into your head; And when Sullivan points out that the candidacy of Lamont is more about purging heretics than politics Hamsher seems to fit that bill.

It is to the films credit that it shows the bloggers warts and all, but the film focuses on the liberal bloggers Who therefore end up taking most of the hits. While right-wing blogger Michelle Malkin comes across as intelligent, well spoken and beautiful; Jane Hamsher, a Hollywood film producer (Natural Born Killers), comes across as well spoken, beautiful, and possessing about as much common sense as one of her ever present dogs. (She is the one after all who decided to post a picture of Lieberman in Blackface with Clinton. When the film gives her a chance to explain herself for this gaff she claims no-one could have foreseen the backlash... (Uh-huh). With no discernible job or income stream Hamsher is more like a rich debutante from California coming to help the little people than anything grassroots. I do wish the film had spent a little more time with ordinary (if less attractive) people.

Speaking of rich debutantes one does have to feel for the Connecticut bloggers. Ned Lamont comes across in the film as he did in the campaign; a slightly duller, slightly richer, and slightly whiter Dan Quayle. The bloggers learned an eternal truth that November. First you need a good product... then you can sell it.

The fact Lamont’s deer in headlights campaign got any votes at all is a testament to the power of the bloggers.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Blog Wars (2006) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: