Directed by | |||
| Laura Dunn | |||
Cinematography by | |||
| Lee Daniel | |||
| Vance Holmes | |||
Film Editing by | |||
| Laura Dunn | |||
| Emily Morris | |||
Sound Department | |||
| Ethan Andrus | .... | sound mixer | |
| Wayne Bell | .... | field recordist | |
| Wayne Bell | .... | sound editor | |
| Wayne Chance | .... | sound editor | |
| Tom Hammond | .... | sound designer | |
| Tom Hammond | .... | sound re-recording mixer | |
| Justin Hennard | .... | sound editor | |
| Dennis Meehan | .... | sound recordist | |
Visual Effects by | |||
| Jef Sewell | .... | motion graphics | |
Editorial Department | |||
| Joe Malina | .... | additional colorist | |
| Oscar Oboza | .... | colorist | |
Music Department | |||
| Brooke Wentz | .... | music clearances | |
Other crew | |||
| Unjoo Lee Byars | .... | main title producer | |
| Kyle Cooper | .... | title designer | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Arid Lands | The Call of the Hummingbird | Grizzly Man | An Inconvenient Truth | Koyaanisqatsi |
|
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Documentary section | IMDb USA section |
This film premiered at Austin's SXSW Film Festival after its initial showing a few months ago at Sundance. The Unforeseen is one of the most cinematically beautiful documentaries to appear in a long time. There are stunning sequences of Barton Springs. One could certainly feel the influence of producers Robert Redford (particularly A River Runs Through It) and Terrence Malick. The nature shots were spectacular. The story that is told is particularly powerful to those who know and love Austin, but the broader conflicts between land development and environmental protection are universal and can be well-understood, although perhaps in a less personal way, by those who have never visited Austin.
While the film is clearly takes a pro-environmental stand, it is not a one-sided polemical. It presents a sympathetic and fair portrait of land developer Gary Bradley. It lets him tell his story without making him out to be a cruel unfeeling villain. It presents the history in a nuanced light that is often missing from documentary film-making. The film includes many conflicting voices and let's the audience make its own decisions. This type of film reflects the best standards of journalistic rather ideological Michael Moore-style manipulative film-making. It presents a complicated conflict of values in a way that both takes a stand without mocking those they disagree with. While some of the narrative seems a little self-righteous at times, and the title (taken from a poem used in the film) seems a little confusing and unclear, overall, the film is an excellent lesson in history and politics. I hope that it gets wide distribution, because it is a debate that the American public needs to engage over what trade offs Americans are willing to make between the environment and development. How much of our natural beauty are we willing to give up to accommodate modernity?