A look at tightrope walker Philippe Petit's daring, but illegal, high-wire routine performed between New York City's World Trade Center's twin towers in 1974, what some consider, "the artistic crime of the century."
Jean François Heckel,
Documentary depicts what happened in Rio de Janeiro on June 12th 2000, when bus 174 was taken by an armed young man, threatening to shoot all the passengers. Transmitted live on all ... See full summary »
Sandro do Nascimento,
Luiz Eduardo Soares
Documentary about Father Oliver O'Grady, a Catholic priest who was relocated to various parishes around the United States during the 1970s in an attempt by the Catholic Church to cover up his rape of dozens of children.
In the 1980s, ruthless Colombian cocaine barons invaded Miami with a brand of violence unseen in this country since Prohibition-era Chicago - and it put the city on the map. "Cocaine ... See full summary »
In February 2009 a group of Danish soldiers accompanied by documentary filmmaker Janus Metz arrived at Armadillo, an army base in the southern Afghan province of Helmand. Metz and cameraman... See full summary »
The War on Drugs has become the longest and most costly war in American history, the question has become, how much more can the country endure? Inspired by the death of four family members ... See full summary »
Using the torture and death in 2002 of an innocent Afghan taxi driver as the touchstone, this film examines changes after 9/11 in U.S. policy toward suspects in the war on terror. Soldiers, their attorneys, one released detainee, U.S. Attorney John Yoo, news footage and photos tell a story of abuse at Bagram Air Base, Abu Ghraib, and Guantanamo Bay. From Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Gonzalez came unwritten orders to use any means necessary. The CIA and soldiers with little training used sleep deprivation, sexual assault, stress positions, waterboarding, dogs and other terror tactics to seek information from detainees. Many speakers lament the loss of American ideals in pursuit of security. Written by
Well-supported proof of the inefficiency of a Bush administration policy
This is yet another documentary aimed at the Bush administration hitting in the soft spot with one of the most stringent issues related to the post 9/11 events. What makes Gibney's film worth watching is its effectiveness in representing its subject matter. Much of this effectiveness stems from the fact that this is, as far as possible, an objective approach. It tries to link the major flaws of the Bush administration to the chain of command that leads to such heinous crimes as depicted in the film. The faults of the administration are not presupposed but shown to be the case in an argumentative manner. It's easy to point the finger and say that something is amiss with the U.S army and its procedures but to actually prove it like a surgeon cutting and exposing the wound is much more convincing.
The subject matter is not entirely new, there have been serious debates about the Bagram and Abu Ghrayb interrogation procedures for the suspects of terrorism as far as 2004 but the issue has never really hit the public with significant impact. This documentary demonstrates without a shadow of a doubt that the U.S army is responsible for murder and the guilt is shared by the administrations' contempt for a legal system (The Geneva Convention) that should give the procedural framework to handle the most difficult cases (even terrorists) as humanely as possible. After all, the Americans handled Hitler's bunch very carefully and they executed them only AFTER they were proved guilty.
But besides showing that the Bush administrations' lack of interest for the law and the absurd behavior among many soldiers lead to innocents' being killed, this film analyzes the matter as a case of administrative failure. Bush and Rumsfeld etc. are not only shown to be immoral (which was a thing that didn't need proof, anyway) but they are shown to be ineffective leaders who are unable to take the best decisions. Torture is not the best alternative to obtain information, not as much as effective as gaining the trust of the prisoner, for instance. Then why do it? Just for the fun of it?
I liked the way this was realized on a technical scale, very good pacing, editing and cinematography (the shots in Afganisthan really managed to capture the beauty of the landscape)
51 of 66 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?