User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Yesterday's Morals Still Relevant
TondaCoolwal26 October 2021
This episode will probably be viewed as naive, quaint even censorious by today's drug tolerant society as it deals with the emerging concerns of the sixties, drug abuse and the breakdown of family relationships.

David Easton, a young man, dies of pneumonia but, an autopsy reveal he was a heroin user. Family friend Andrew Quincey invites pathologist Professor Robert Lazard to his home to ask if he can avoid mentioning the drug use. However, Lazard notices Quincey's son Gerry, a student. The young man is hyper active and is anxious to get to his club to meet friends. Lazard concludes that Gerry is also a user but Quincey refuses to believe it, insisting that he and his son have a close, honest relationship. However, Gerry later doses up on Purple Hearts, the Extasy of the sixties, and confronts Easton's girlfriend Carol. It emerges that she was aware of David's drug use and had convinced him to give it up. Unfortunately, without medical treatment his body was unable to fight infection which is why he died. Gerry beats Carol, who is saved by neighbours, but he has no memory of the incident, even when faced with the battered girl. Also he cannot accept that taking "pep pills" could result in addiction. With Quincey's permission Lazard tries a shock tactic to bring Gerry to his senses. However, the episode ends without the audience knowing if the ruse has worked.

As mentioned above, this will appear rather innocent and obvious, not to mention amusing in parts. E.g. Gerry has to explain the phrase "It's a drag." to Lazard. But, Gerry's carefree and careless attitude to the drugs he is using came to typify young people in the sixties. Much to the horror and embarassment of their parents. A period piece.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It ended less brusqely than the first...
boilerhogs11 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
...but was still left open to interpretation, on whether Prof. Lezars' tactic worked on Jerry. Personally, I thought it *had* worked, by his reaction. But argument could certainly made for the opposition.

I rated this the same 5/10, even though I was more satisfied with how it ended. Reason being that I was far more invested emotionally with the core characters in "A Question of Involvement". I really felt for the couple and the Drs. And definitely loathed all of the villagers; police included. Though I enjoyed this episode, and I really like the Professor, it was hard to care about a rich, undisciplined, woman-beating drug addict. Oh, poor me; I'm going to Cambridge...

I kind of feel perhaps The Hidden Truth may have been going for that gritty, unapologetic and wholly unsatisfying ending that was becoming extremely popular in Hollywood films, similar to Sam Pekinpah or Arthur Manns' work. Bit I'm basing that off two episodes of weird endings. (I don't know anything about British cinema or telly, but watching TPTV has been a pleasure, since TCM here is dreadful). Anyway, I kind of understand what they were trying to do, if indeed this is what it was...life is imperfect, messy and often extremely unfair. I just prefer it when everyone gets what they deserve. Good or bad. Injustices are nearly intolerable for me.

Now, to watch the last one. 😆
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed