(2013)

Critic Reviews

63

Metascore

Based on 46 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
78
An efficient and effectively exciting globe-spanning zombie thriller.
70
Emerges as a surprisingly smart, gripping and imaginative addition to the zombie-movie canon, owing as much to scientific disaster movies like “The China Syndrome” and “Contagion” as it does to undead ur-texts like the collected works of George Romero.
70
Forster's meticulousness—coupled with ample excuses to blow stuff up—isn't enough to turn World War Z into one of those class-A end-of-everything movies that leaves you feeling just a little bit queasy, momentarily uncertain of your own small place in this unmanageable world.
60
This nightmarish travelogue is coy about gore, but it’s still an effective thrill-ride. If the sequel happens, let’s hope it delivers some actual combat.
60
Choosing quantity over quality, intensity over tension and big-screen thrills over low-fi shocks – this is probably what the zombie apocalypse will actually look like.
60
Brad Pitt delivers a capable performance in an immersive apocalyptic spectacle about a global zombie uprising.
60
While some of World War Z is rotten, the whole stands as a punchy, if conventional action thriller.
60
The result looks less like a horror flick and more like a thinking man’s action-thriller – the ‘Newsnight’ of zombie films (you’ll know if that’s your cup of tea).
58
The film can be engaging, well-made, and even a touch more interesting than it has much right to be. But it's also far from a satisfying work as a whole.
40
What we get is a collection of moderately violent action set-pieces untroubled by humour or broader coherence.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for World War Z (2013) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews