IMDb >
Religulous (2008)
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsReligulous (2008) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 12 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 12) |
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writer:
Bill Maher (written by)
Release Date:
3 October 2008 (USA)
more
Genre:
Tagline:
Do you smell something burning? more
Plot:
Bill Maher's take on the current state of world religion. full summary | add synopsis
Awards:
2 wins
&
1 nomination
more
NewsDesk:
(110 articles)
Trailer Park: Peter Rodger
(From . 13 November 2009, 12:18 AM, PST)
Discuss: Is 'The Invention of Lying' Just an Atheist Screed?
(From Cinematical. 12 October 2009, 3:02 PM, PDT)
(From . 13 November 2009, 12:18 AM, PST)
Discuss: Is 'The Invention of Lying' Just an Atheist Screed?
(From Cinematical. 12 October 2009, 3:02 PM, PDT)
User Comments:
Fantastic
more (232 total)
Cast
(Credited cast)| Bill Maher | ... | Himself | |
| rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
| Steve Burg | ... | Himself | |
| Francis Collins | ... | Himself | |
| George Coyne | ... | Himself | |
| Jeremiah Cummings | ... | Himself | |
| Jose Luis De Jesus Miranda | ... | Himself | |
| Reginald Foster | ... | Himself | |
| Ted Haggard | ... | Himself (archive footage) | |
| Dean Hamer | ... | Himself (as Dr. Dean Hamer) | |
| Ken Ham | ... | Himself | |
| Julie Maher | ... | Herself | |
| Kathy Maher | ... | Herself | |
| Aki Nawaz | ... | Himself (as Propa-Gandhi) | |
| Andrew Newberg | ... | Himself | |
| Fred Phelps | ... | Himself (archive footage) | |
| Mark Pryor | ... | Himself | |
| Ray Suarez | ... | Himself | |
| Yisroel Dovid Weiss | ... | Himself | |
| John Westcott | ... | Himself | |
| Geert Wilders | ... | Himself | |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
A Spiritual Journey (USA) (fake working title)
Untitled Larry Charles Project (USA) (working title)
more
Untitled Larry Charles Project (USA) (working title)
more
MPAA:
Rated R for some language and sexual material.
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
101 min
Country:
Color:
Sound Mix:
Certification:
USA:R (certificate #44539) |
UK:15 |
Australia:M |
Switzerland:10 (canton of Geneva) |
Switzerland:10 (canton of Vaud) |
South Africa:18 |
New Zealand:M |
Ireland:15A |
Portugal:M/12 |
Finland:K-11 |
Germany:12 |
Netherlands:12 |
Mexico:B15 |
Hong Kong:IIB
Filming Locations:
Company:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
The film used the fake working title "A Spiritual Journey" in order to obtain interviews with religious leaders. They did not know that Bill Maher was involved in the film until he arrived for the interviews.
more
Goofs:
Errors in geography: The truck stop chapel is not actually located in Raleigh, NC, as claimed in the film, but is near Charlotte, NC. Raleigh and Charlotte are further from each other than LA and San Diego. Charlotte is an extremely conservative town compared with Raleigh.
more
Quotes:
Bill Maher:
Anyone who tells you that they know, they just know what happens when you die, I promise you, you don't. How can I be so sure? Because I don't know and you do not possess mental powers that I do not.
more
Movie Connections:
Features The Last Temptation of Christ (1988)
more
Soundtrack:
Yiddish Blues
more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (232 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Religulous (2008) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Join Us | Jesus Camp | W. | The Ruling Class | Palindromes |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Documentary section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |














I found this movie exhilarating. I'm with you, Bill Maher! That said, this film attempts to cover the basic tenets and idiocies of several of the major religions, namely Catholicism, Judaism, and Islam. It also encompasses evangelical/American/born-again-type Jesus-focused religion, which considers itself "Christian" but I have never understood that title, since Catholics revere Jesus also. But anyway...
Maher is a smart man, and I would like to think that he considered the points I feel were left out of the movie and chose not to include them for the sake of condensing the film. However, there are several facts that I think would have made an even stronger case against mass religion in general:
1. Although Maher mentions several times that the Judeo-Christian Bible was written by men, and therefore contains the fallacies of men, he does not bring up the fact that the Bible has been constantly rewritten, translated from language to language, and amended to suit the needs of those in charge of its distribution -- for most of history since Christ, this was the Catholic Church and its founders. And for those of you who don't know, translation is not an exact science. Languages just do not translate word for word, and the accuracy of the translation depends on the skill, vocabulary, and motives of the translator (a human being, don't forget).
2. Catholicism was successful because it incorporated many old religions. Greek and Roman gods are just a few of those who have direct equivalents among the Catholic saints. Mahar discusses the inherent flaw in a monotheistic religion with bunches of demigods, but he does not point out that Catholicism deliberately found supposedly Catholic replacements for the more ancient, household-type gods. Why? Because those who wanted the religion to succeed decided that people would be more likely to convert to it if it weren't too different from what they were used to. Why did these men want the religion to succeed? For the same reasons that people promote religions today: to gain money and power, particularly in the form of influence. Maher reminds us that the story of Jesus Christ included many elements of older heroes or gods, but the film presents this as a matter of fact, not pointing out that Catholicism was built upon the success of these preceding stories and histories. The types of dramas that move the human spirit have not changed over thousands of years--they have simply been retold and reinterpreted.
3. My third point is more of a question. I was raised as a "nouveau" American Catholic, so I feel that I know a little bit about that religion, but I know next to nothing about Islam. However, it is my understanding that Mohammed did not want images of himself used to promote his teachings. Is this why some Muslims get so mad when an image, ridiculing or not, of the prophet is publicized? I wish Maher had included this, as he did talk a lot about the violence specified in the Koran.
This is a terrific film. It is funny and has a great soundtrack. My hat is off to Maher for his nerve in interviewing people who become belligerent when their religion is questioned. I guess it partly comes from being a comedian--one must have guts and a thick skin! The message of the film, however, is not humorous at all. It is truly terrifying to think of all the murder, torture, and oppression that is perpetuated in the name of religion. Why then, is someone who calls himself "Godly" or "religious" considered to be a person with wholesome morals?