|Page 5 of 9:||        |
|Index||84 reviews in total|
Joshua (Jacob Kogan) is a intelligent 9 year-old boy, who starts to
feel left out. When his baby sister Lily is born, since it brings joy
to his parents Brad (Sam Rockwell) and Abby (Vera Farmiga). When weeks
has passed, the baby Lily can't stop crying and especially at nights.
Which Abby turns depressing and she trying her best to raise her child.
Since her husband works often in the city. Then the parents slowly
realized that Joshua is changing and not for the better. Especially
when Joshua starts to realized that his parents are not the loving
couple, they seems to be and he is planning something sinister for his
Directed by George Ratliff made an fascinating creepy little thriller that is well-acted (Especially by Kogan & Farmiga as Joshua's long-suffering mother), well directed and it has some enjoyable suspenseful moments. This is an interesting character study of what it seems to be a happy family that goes terribly wrong. This has good supporting performances by Dallas Roberts as Abby's worried gay brother and Celia Weston as Brad's overly-proud religious mother. I haven't a creepy looking child like Kogan's performance in a long time and he is certainly eerie at times. But the movie does have its problems towards the last 20 minutes, which its raises more questions than answers. But it is one of those movies, you want to see again. It's certainly one of the most underrated films of 2007. Don't miss it. Written by David Gilbert and by the director:Ratliff. (****/*****).
I can't believe the overall rating on this film was a paltry 6.0, thus
it's obviously up to me to do all that is in my power to make sure this
film get to at least a 6.5, or more on IMDb, seeing that this number
represents my cut off point for what I'll view on film; unless, of
course, I've seen the film and fallen in love with it before I've
visited IMDb, then, my personal rating cut off point trumps IMDb, and I
won't feel like I've just wasted 2 hours, the time it takes watch a
movie while stuffing my face with popcorn. Joshua is one of those
movies which I fell in love with at the theater, watching it twice,
just because I wanted to see the closing scene just one more time.
This movie seriously reminded of a type of Exorcist but without the supernatural agency of evil and special effects which at times can confuse and reduce the art of film making to an amusement park theme. Joshua was just pure evil; no let me rephrase: If you ever wanted to know what pure evil is then Joshua represents the carbon copy definitive energy vibration of such a manifestation. Joshua, in time will be a cult classic, only its so dark I doubt if it will ever go mainstream, due to the fact that it utterly demonizes a certain group in our society, which I'm sure do not want the added label of masochistic & sadists.
Truly one of the most vulgar movies I've ever seen. Jacob Kogan did a spectacular job. I cant tell you how many times I wanted to kick some anti rational sense into this child until love manifested; first rate acting - my blood ran cold. Kogan should do some pretty good work if he can keeps his personality and mind together through puberty; a truly wonderful recruit to the film badboys, yea, weze baby, bop bop bop! The psychological dynamics of this film is what I found most interesting. the fact that a child can learn just about anything in our society even Sun Tzu warfare and complete dysfunctional passionate obsession, but not love, is the one great symbolic message in Joshua which rings true and resonated on my psyche most after watching this film. My new cut off for viewing films is 6.1 on IMDb thanks to Joshua.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Well I wouldn't say this is the most thrilling film to ever be seen,
nor the most horrific of horrors, but the certain cold chill that
frames the whole unwinding story makes it truly intriguing. Joshua, the
nine year old perfect son, that every parent could wish for passes
through at the start of this film. He's a smart, obedient, piano
playing, but somehow odd child. The family is happy, and well together.
Once the newborn Lily arrives, you see from Joshua how much he resents
her, but in some way he shows love to her. What made the first scenes
right till the end very chilling and unpredictable, was the lack of
speech from Jousha. This in my opinion made the movie much better. Once
we begin to see how different this child is, due to what we never
really understand. At school he exceeds in excellence, he plays the
piano with such perfection. And as we gather he is a dark spirited
child, portrayed by the other characters speech. Josha plays dark,
death signing songs on the piano, noticed by the mother in law. He does
not share a close proximity of a relationship with his father, and his
mother never sees the interest. Their the kind of family that from a
picture looks perfect, but when seen in action their flaws unwind. As
the story unravels, we are lead to believe that the death of Innocent
animals is due to Joshua, and the constant crying from baby Lily steers
the poor mother to insanity, the father is left to leave his job and
take the care. A few exceptionally chilling scenes for me and well
thought out, from such a devious little boy, were the glass scene and
the pram scene. When the glass breaks in the kitchen, Josha moves back,
as knowing his mother will reach for him, she treads forward and of
course as established on to glass, cutting a deep serge into her foot,
which is the next step of her breakdown. However, we cannot say whether
the child here is all to blame. One thing that really disturbed me, was
when she began to smear blood up her legs and talk about her "sexy red
boots" that to me really gave you that feeling that she was maybe even
more "Mucked Up" that him, hence her illness. The pram scene was
dramatic and we all knew what was coming, but i do believe that Joshua
never intended to hurt Lily, he didn't exactly hurry to push her down a
flight of stairs, he merely strolled outside and he knew that the
mother in law was running behind, and of course i do think he knew the
father was watching. I think that this was his intentional plan, to
have the people watch, until he finally targeted the opinionated mother
in law, and she is next into the coffin. What seemed obscene to me, was
how little feeling the characters showed, when his mother was pushed
(or so we assume) the father, did not show any emotion he merely clung
to Lily and although we could see his hurt he did no show any signs of
anger. However once with Joshua i saw the true side of his father that
Joshua had been waiting to release. "I know what your doing Joshua, Im
on to you," to me really made it seem as though they were battling men,
not a nine year old son with his mental driving father. Over the film
so many varied thrills happen, some leading to nothing and others
leading to tragic breakdowns. The abuse scene with Joshua and his
father really shocked me, i saw his fathers anger but he really went
for it, with Joshua's evil mimics, shown several times over the film
(e.g. when the dog died, he mimicked his fathers sadness) and when he
was climbing and he repeated his father, he knew just how to push his
buttons. Once the father had lost his temper what really gave it that
final blow for me was the small sly smile that formed on Joshua's lips,
he seemed happy, he had finally managed to make his family fall apart,
and his father to reveal everything. This was a very well thought film,
with similar story lines of older films, however this one had s more
certain chill, less horror and more, dark edge. The final points to
assume, were the way that Lily was never harmed, she in the viewers
eyes was the reason for Joshua's dislike, however he never hurt her, or
harmed her. Also the relationship with his uncle was mysterious and
odd, he loved his uncle a lot more that he you saw with his parents,
they shared a bond for music, both piano genius', whereas his dad was a
pop music headphone listening kinda guy. At the end when Joshua sung a
song as he and his uncle played a song, he said "this feels right
doesn't it? how it should have been?" you get the feeling hes referring
to it should be him as his father. As earlier he stated when his was in
room to his dad, "do you ever feel weird about me?" we sense that
Joshua did towards him, but never towards his uncle. A dark bond i
never assumed to happen, but a very wicked ending with everything out
Overall a good film, watch if your mature enough to understand the true depth of this film, and see Joshua as he begins to dismantle his family.
i had never even heard of this film until after i had seen Orphan.some of the reviews for that film and the message board had recommended this film.some had suggested it was a superior film.so i decided to give it a shot.i'm not sure i would call it a superior film.it has some similarities to Orphan for sure.however,i found it much more deliberately paced than Orphan was.Vera Farmiga(who played the Mother in Orphan)plays the Mother here and is a revelation.and Sam Rockwell is very good as the father slowly unravelling at the seams.Joshua(Jacob Kogan)is certainly an evil seed,there's no doubt about that.but i just didn't quite feel the same intensity as i did with Orphan.don't get me wrong.this is still a good movie.for me,Joshua is an 7/10
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
How refreshing to see a movie that is creepy all the way through to the end, without relying on some sappy supernatural "explanation" for all the evil. Joshua as a Machiavellian child prodigy makes mincemeat out of his unsuspecting and clueless parents (not to mention his grandma and uncle). This movie will raise the little hairs on the back of your neck again and again, and remains faithful to its premise, which is very refreshing in these days of the "devil made me do it" (literally) cop-out ending. The director makes us uneasy with the sheer evil and total absence of remorse displayed by Joshua, and it seems all the more terrible since his parents don't suspect a thing. There is a little religious mumbo-jumbo thrown in (Grandma takes Joshua to an evangelical gathering), but this is secondary to the plot and just demonstrates how the opportunistic child uses this weakness in his grandmother to further his destructive agenda.
I had interest in watching Joshua,because I had read a lot of excellent
commentaries about it.I had finally the opportunity to watch it
and,although I liked it,I have to say it disappointed me a little
bit.This is a solid movie but for some reason,I did not find it
memorable.First,let's see the positive elements from this movie.Sam
Rockwell and Vera Farmiga bring brilliant performances,which are full
of details and which are absolutely natural and credible.I would have
liked to see these two actors getting recognition for their excellent
works.I also appreciated the ambiguity from this movie.I like to see a
movie which trusts the spectator will be enough intelligent for taking
out conclusions.Now,I have to mention the negative elements from this
movie.I did not like Jakob Kogan's performance too much.I do not think
it's bad but I think he should have been a little bit more credible and
natural on his role of an evil kid.Plus,there are a few irrelevant
scenes.I liked Joshua,mainly for the fact that it kept me
entertained.But,with the exception of Rockwell's and Farmiga's
performances,I do not find something special on it.In summary,a solid
film,but not too memorable.
Rating : 7.5
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I had high hopes for this film after reading reviews comparing it to
the Omen but apart from the child's resemblance to Damien there is
little more connecting these films. While the idea and plot is
compelling there is no suspense and the film never reaches a crescendo
while the storyline is unconvincing on several occasions. The kid's
acting was pretty unconvincing too, however, I was pretty happy with
the rest of the cast.
I didn't get the feeling that the kid was neglected by the parents, who had many opportunities to figure out that there was something wrong. Perhaps the most disturbing part of the film is the ending that was totally unexpected, and it may be worth watching the film just for this.
Overall the film is worth watching but don't expect to be thrown back - perhaps if you are a parent you will learn something.
It was enjoyable most of the time, though I don't think it's anything
I'll watch again (so it'd make a good rent).
That said, it really shows the parents steadily going crazy with the problems of the new child, and the family slowly falling apart. Joshua's part is very well done and creepy.
While some of it is a bit slow moving, it is made up for in the parts that give looks into Joshua's mind. The horror parts are horrifying (being 16, I can only imagine how hard the scene with Joshua/his dad near the end is to watch for a parent). The scenes showing the family slowly falling apart are quite depressing, the horror scenes are quite horrifying, and the whole movie is very intelligent. Not a full on horror movie, but certainly worth the time it takes to watch it.
What a pleasant surprise. There are movies that know exactly the 'how',
the 'when', the 'who' and particularly to whom. There's a way of making
good movies, a way every filmmaker should consider, and that's the way
of not leaving the viewer outside the story. Believe it or not, when
the viewer gets involved (for better or worse), everything is better.
We may want to stop watching the film or take their eyes off the
screen, or shout, or whatever; but the important thing is something is
Director George Ratliff certainly knows this way, and in "Joshua", his first full-length fiction project, he exploits it: there are times, believe me, in which we become the characters. There's no big sound tricks, no more score than strong piano notes at the right moments (courtesy of Nico Muhly) and some weird noises. However, the impact comes from Jacob Kogan's face and his performance; always an important element if you want to make the viewer believe a little boy can be really mean.
Kogan plays Joshua, of course, and his role implies much more than a spooky face, a face that he doesn't even have because he's, although special, a normal kid. The script by the director David Gilbert never hides this fact and holds on to it to make accentuate the suffering of a family that's falling apart, that can't take it no more and that, we suspect, it might all be because Joshua intentionally wants to harm them. But we don't want to believe it, no one would want to believe such a thing, less so in a film where there's no prophecy from hell or religious implications whatsoever. In fact, Joshua hasn't even been baptized because his parents have different religions.
Brad (Sam Rockwell), a working man who wants the best for his family, and Abby (Vera Farmiga), a housewife who suffers a lot at home but won't accept that a nanny watches her children, have just had a daughter: Lily. If you must know how well Ratliff handles suspense, time in the movie goes by announced by the days of life of the little girl (and that strong piano note). The screen goes black and we read the numbers; sometimes only a few days have passes, sometimes weeks.
The timing of the director never fails, and the movie runs its time slowly but intensely. The elements of the house that once were so bright, start getting darker: the cries of Abby become louder, the hours at Brad's work become tougher, the social environment seems suffocating for a family that chooses to build their life at home, with the exception of dog walks in the park and occasional visits to museums. And I'm not telling you everything.
There are two key characters, played brilliantly by Dallas Roberts and Celia Weston, whose importance is (intelligently) not completely noticed. Then again, this is because we can't notice it. Ratliff handles the 'how' and the 'when' so perfectly because he knows how to handle the 'who'. We see Brad fighting for his family, constantly saying "it's okay, it's okay", and Sam Rockwell's work is fantastic because he plays such a nice guy that gradually turns into, well, Sam Rockwell (or the Sam Rockwell we've seen on screen so much); taking a very realistic and humane attitude towards the heavy problems going on in his own house. Then the focus changes, and it's all about Abby (Vera Farmiga's disintegration is also admirable), or it's all about Joshua; and that focus determines everything else. This way, the suspense works, and the 'to whom' also changes, with the constant and never forgotten provocation towards the viewer.
Answers? Hints, maybe, but nothing concrete. And as a viewer, a movie that defies me without helping me and also defies the standard genres, with the bonus of making me feel something, is more than I can ask for.
This film is just...wow. After all this unintelligent no thought T and A torture porn horror movies we've been getting (Almost all of which had been remakes of films from the seventies and the eighties) it's nice to see a horror film with some substance and thought put in it. This movie really makes you think. Was the boy truly evil? Was his sociopath behavior a result of the neglect from his parents? Without giving anything away the ending will seriously disturb you. Although this movie may sound something like a cross between The Omen and The Good Son trust me it's not. This movie is very original. Not only is "Joshua" the best horror movie in the last decade it's one of the best horror movies of all time.
|Page 5 of 9:||        |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Awards||Newsgroup reviews||External reviews|
|Parents Guide||Official site||Plot keywords|
|Main details||Your user reviews||Your vote history|