Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?



Credited cast:
Himself (archive footage)
Waggoner Carr ...
Himself - Texas, Attorney General (archive footage)
George DeMohrenschildt ...
Himself - Oswald Associate (archive footage)
Himself (archive footage)
James Humes ...
Himself - Pathologist (archive footage)
Himself (archive footage)
Malcolm Kilduff ...
Himself - Assistant White House Press Secretary (archive footage)
David Lifton ...
Himself - Assassination Researcher (archive footage)
Paul O'Connor ...
Himself - Autopsy Technician (archive footage)
Lee Harvey Oswald ...
Himself - Assassin (archive footage)
Paul Peters ...
Himself - Doctor (archive footage)
L. Fletcher Prouty ...
Himself - Pentagon Liason to CIA and Secret Service (archive footage)
Aubrey Reich ...
Himself - Mortuary Technician (archive footage)
Himself - New York Time Reporter (archive footage)


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis





Official Sites:



Release Date:

9 September 2003 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Dark Legacy: George Bush and the Murder of John Kennedy  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


See  »

Did You Know?


References JFK: The Case for Conspiracy (1993) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

terrifying or hilarious depending on your view..
20 August 2006 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

I watched this streamed on the net and it is at the very least, interesting. I watched it with an open mind, I don't understand why these conspiracy theory films have such a hard time getting seen. If they are untrue then what the hell is anyone worrying about. At least they get people talking and thinking. I don't trust Bush and his cronies but this takes the plot beyond most peoples wildest imaginations. The single bullet theory seems to me to obviously be nonsense and a cover up, but this film takes it it a whole new level. If what this film shows is true then its the most amazing cover-up in the history of the world and it should be seen, if it's false then it's a great example of what you can achieve with way too much time on your hands and a vivid imagination. The evidence for the former being very compelling at some points. It's definitely worth seeing regardless.

26 of 29 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page