742 out of 873 people found the following comment useful :- This thing won't let me vote below a 1...., 26 January 2007
Author:
Jason Taylor from United States
After watching this movie, I just couldn't stop talking about it. Mind
you, not in the sense that someone can't stop talking about a great
book or show, but more along the line of how someone can't stop talking
about their colonoscopy during a diner conversation. In other words,
after seeing this you can't help but try and remove the stain it left
on your very soul by vomiting out the experience onto others.
This movie entered with the tag line of being "written by two of the
six writers of 'Scary Movie'!" What they forgot to mention is that the
two who wrote it were only responsible for writing the credits and all
the jokes deleted for the sake of not causing mass suicide. Put more
delicately, this movie almost makes Pootie Tang look Oscar worthy,
which ironically enough was made fun of in the last Scary Movie for
being horrid. Coincidence? Yeah, not even some sort of Karma dealing
fiend would wish this movie upon the world.
"So," you ask, "What makes it so bad?" I bet your thinking that all of
the funny stuff was in the previews, right? No, actually there was no
funny content in the previews at all, it just seemed that way when
taken out of the context of the movie. Much the same way "Hogan's
Heroes" was funny to people who weren't in Auschwitz during the
Holocaust, the previews are funny to those who haven't seen the movie.
When you actually see the movie, you start to ask, "Why was that funny
in the preview?" The answer: You can see pretty flowers if you ignore
the fact that they are growing from the corpse of a man who died during
a freak green house accident.
Do yourself a favor, rent a History channel documentary on the history
of documentaries and hit yourself in the head with a hammer. It'll be
twice as funny, make three times more sense, and be only a fifth as
painful.
394 out of 510 people found the following comment useful :- Just awful, 27 January 2007
Author:
ozlifter from Oklahoma, US
In the past 10 years, I've probably seen more than 200 movies at
theaters. This is the first movie that I've ever walked out on. 45
minutes in, I couldn't handle the torture anymore. This is the most
unfunny piece of garbage I've ever seen. Although, I did get a good
chuckle when about 50% of the audience had left before the halfway
mark.
It's hard to meet the minimum post-length requirement for this movie,
because there isn't much to say about it.
I didn't find any of the gags clever. Nor did I find them funny. I did
think some of the set designs looked okay. The casting directors also
found someone who looked surprisingly like Jack Black, although sadly
the script didn't give him anything funny to do.
Just avoid this. It's not even worth a rental.
272 out of 338 people found the following comment useful :- Epic failure, 26 January 2007
Author:
Mike Brislee from Australia
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
It's a shame to see films that promise to parody the formulaic and
over-constructed nature of "epic" films, but fail, and subsequently
conform to what is now the "spoof" genre. In parodying said films, they
merely reconstruct the setting (poorly) i.e. Willy Wonka's chocolate
river becomes poo. The references to pop culture are 1: over used 2:
Poorly used 3: Irrelevant and not funny. It appears that the budget was
spent on midgets and a dance choreographer (apparently it is funny when
medieval knights, pirates, dwarfs and oompa loompas dance). The
narrative is infantile and not remotely funny, no imagination could
possibly enjoy the pure nonsense of the characterization. Parody films
are meant to parody and this one fails to come even close to funny, it
irreverence is pathetic, not hilarious and the writers...well, where to
start with them.
If you like watching pictures move and people talk, this film is
probably for you. If you like films that are intelligent in their
parody and genuinely funny, then stick to the Scary Movie catalogue.
Even Date Movie was better than this and that's saying something.
This film trades on the pretension that it will be funny it is not,
someone should report it to a fair trading body. I personally wonder
what is more disturbing, that people would enjoy this movie, or that
Hollywood thinks that people will enjoy it.
271 out of 370 people found the following comment useful :- why do studios accept to make movies like this?!?, 26 January 2007
Author:
bourgeoismarc-1 from Canada
There is nothing original here whatsoever-same old big breast jokes,
oral sex jokes; sloppy tongue-kissing, spoofing of movies not
necessarily worth spoofing, and using the same old actors (i.e. Adam
Campbell) from other horrible spoofing movies. It is disappointing to
see that actors who have received some acclaim from both critics and
the public alike have starred in this-the worst movie ever made-worse
than Grease 2. And only a few minutes longer than a regular TV show
except without interesting commercials, it is highway robbery to make
anyone pay to see this half-baked movie where writers, producers,
actors and directors have only put half an effort to do something that
at least would be satisfactory. And half is giving them too much
credit. Unfortunately for Kal Penn, Jennifer Coolidge, Faune A.
Chambers and Crispin Glover (you waited for this movie to return to the
big screen? where were you last couple of years? in detox?), I won't be
running to the theatre any time soon to see one of their movies any
time soon.
Studio decision-makers have to take a stand against these movies-and so
does the industry. Pre-teens, teens and young adults have shown that
they have interests in seeing well-written, acted, developed and
intelligent movies. Don't take the easy way out to do these useless
piece of junk.
232 out of 317 people found the following comment useful :- A movie so funny you'll forget to laugh., 26 January 2007
Author:
mastermike569 from United States
Watching the previews for this movie I was expecting to have some good
laughs. After watching the actual movie however I was extremely
disappointed. 95% of the movie I didn't even have a little chuckle or a
laugh. I ended up slightly laughing to some of the pathetic vulgar
stuff. Even the potty humor in this movie was really really bad. (
Worse potty humor ever!) I am a pretty big fan of potty humor and
immature stuff ... but what this movie had to offer was sadly
disappointing with what was presented. Aside from the humor there was
many rap music type scenes where the characters were participating in a
lamed down style of a MTV music video... many of these scenes were
unnecessary or too much and far from entertaining. They were more or
less not enjoyable and far too many like them. Now to the good parts of
the movie ... trust me I'm trying hard to find em! Many movies were
parodied and you will probably recognize most of them and there is an
occasional scene where they throw characters from other movies in for
the hell of it just to have them in the movie. I also liked the rap
dance scene (only one i liked) where they were doing a Pirates of the
Caribbean rap dance. It reminded me of Captain Dan the Hip Hop
Pirate..I wonder if they were trying to parody that guy? Well folks
there wasn't much more to this movie other than a waste of time and
disappointment.
170 out of 201 people found the following comment useful :- Not actually a movie..., 30 January 2007
Author:
solidgoldchimp from United Kingdom
...but rather just a list of movies that the filmmakers wanted to
parody, strung together by the weakest plot in film history and a lot
of unfunny jokes.
You would think that the team responsible for the mess of a movie that
was Date Movie would at least have learned something from their last
film to help them avoid the same mistakes, but they didn't.
It would appear they spent more time making parodies as visually
accurate as they could and spent almost no time trying to make the film
entertaining. Some of the parodies seem completely out of place and
don't even fit into what little plot there is.
I couldn't recommend this film to anyone, not even those I hated.
150 out of 201 people found the following comment useful :- Who the hell rated this movie a 10?, 30 January 2007
Author:
Markus (all_we_need_is_a_drummer) from United Kingdom
Seriously people, i wasn't expecting much from this and i didn't get
much. I at least expected a few laughs from it but i never got it. I
think they let five year olds write the script for this crap. Very,
very cliché spoof film, you could tell what was coming the whole way
through (with a few stupid exceptions). They seriously need to stop
spoof movies, i thought you couldn't get any worse than Scary Movie 4
but i was wrong. Writing a spoof takes no talent what so ever, just
copy everyones ideas and "try" to make them funny. Now i could go on
all day about how bad this movie is but I'm afraid i must go, everyone
do yourself a favour, do not see this rubbish.
161 out of 242 people found the following comment useful :- Please refer to reviews on Date Movie, 24 January 2007
Author:
Mr_Happychaps from New Zealand
Some movies are funny, some are not. This movie may be funny to you, if
you liked Date Movie, since both films are pretty much the same in cast
and script quality.
Epic Movie is a loosely strung together collection of slap-stick comedy
sketches based on various epic movies (Pirates of the Caribbean, Nacho
Libre, Chronicles of Narnia, X-Men, Superman, etc...) so it's probably
helpful if you have seen a few of the epics this movie takes off at, to
understand the jokes used. (If you've seen the clips during MTV video
awards, you get the idea on the kind of jokes I'm referring to). Epic
Movie tries to cash in on the Scary Movie, Date Movie, "Movie" Movie
franchise, but doesn't measure up to the originality shown in the Scary
Movie series.
It doesn't take a genius to recommend that you save your box-office
ticket money, and if you're interested, wait for the DVD, since this
isn't an essential big screen movie.
119 out of 167 people found the following comment useful :- Epic Movie is a Disaster of Epic Proportions, 26 January 2007
Author:
Burleigh7
Alright, it wasn't that bad, but it was close. Sure the Scary Movie
series as well as Date Movie were stupid and juvenile, but this is
dumber than all the rest. There were a few chuckles, but overall it was
mostly me groaning. Nearly every joke was tired and lame. They gave
away all the "good" jokes in the trailer. Why Fred Willard and Jennifer
Coolidge would be in this I have no idea. But Crispin Glover? The
oddball actor who was so great in films like Back to the Future,
River's Edge What's Eating Gilbert Grape and more? Yeah that's him all
right, as Willy Wonka dancing around to crappy songs. So maybe my title
was accurate.
130 out of 197 people found the following comment useful :- Movie Is Not Worth Seeing, 26 January 2007
Author:
devilmonkey_1192 from United States
I personally loved scary movies 1-3 but lately the creators haven't
been that "creative". Scary movie 4, Date Movie, and this one Epic
Movie, have been all the same humor lately, they aren't funny at all, i
saw Epic Movie and i thought "You know what? I would've boughten 2
blockbuster movies instead of seeing this movie for 5 bucks. I couldn't
believe it, i expected much more from them. There were some okay funny
parts but the majority of the movie was annoying and i wanted it to
end. All in all, if you haven't seen the trailer at all you will enjoy
it, but the trailer spoils it all just like these past 3 movies they
have done it that way.
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Epic Movie (2007) More at IMDbPro »
742 out of 873 people found the following comment useful :-

This thing won't let me vote below a 1...., 26 January 2007
Author: Jason Taylor from United States
After watching this movie, I just couldn't stop talking about it. Mind you, not in the sense that someone can't stop talking about a great book or show, but more along the line of how someone can't stop talking about their colonoscopy during a diner conversation. In other words, after seeing this you can't help but try and remove the stain it left on your very soul by vomiting out the experience onto others.
This movie entered with the tag line of being "written by two of the six writers of 'Scary Movie'!" What they forgot to mention is that the two who wrote it were only responsible for writing the credits and all the jokes deleted for the sake of not causing mass suicide. Put more delicately, this movie almost makes Pootie Tang look Oscar worthy, which ironically enough was made fun of in the last Scary Movie for being horrid. Coincidence? Yeah, not even some sort of Karma dealing fiend would wish this movie upon the world.
"So," you ask, "What makes it so bad?" I bet your thinking that all of the funny stuff was in the previews, right? No, actually there was no funny content in the previews at all, it just seemed that way when taken out of the context of the movie. Much the same way "Hogan's Heroes" was funny to people who weren't in Auschwitz during the Holocaust, the previews are funny to those who haven't seen the movie. When you actually see the movie, you start to ask, "Why was that funny in the preview?" The answer: You can see pretty flowers if you ignore the fact that they are growing from the corpse of a man who died during a freak green house accident.
Do yourself a favor, rent a History channel documentary on the history of documentaries and hit yourself in the head with a hammer. It'll be twice as funny, make three times more sense, and be only a fifth as painful.
394 out of 510 people found the following comment useful :-
Just awful, 27 January 2007
Author: ozlifter from Oklahoma, US
In the past 10 years, I've probably seen more than 200 movies at theaters. This is the first movie that I've ever walked out on. 45 minutes in, I couldn't handle the torture anymore. This is the most unfunny piece of garbage I've ever seen. Although, I did get a good chuckle when about 50% of the audience had left before the halfway mark.
It's hard to meet the minimum post-length requirement for this movie, because there isn't much to say about it.
I didn't find any of the gags clever. Nor did I find them funny. I did think some of the set designs looked okay. The casting directors also found someone who looked surprisingly like Jack Black, although sadly the script didn't give him anything funny to do.
Just avoid this. It's not even worth a rental.
272 out of 338 people found the following comment useful :-

Epic failure, 26 January 2007
Author: Mike Brislee from Australia
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
It's a shame to see films that promise to parody the formulaic and over-constructed nature of "epic" films, but fail, and subsequently conform to what is now the "spoof" genre. In parodying said films, they merely reconstruct the setting (poorly) i.e. Willy Wonka's chocolate river becomes poo. The references to pop culture are 1: over used 2: Poorly used 3: Irrelevant and not funny. It appears that the budget was spent on midgets and a dance choreographer (apparently it is funny when medieval knights, pirates, dwarfs and oompa loompas dance). The narrative is infantile and not remotely funny, no imagination could possibly enjoy the pure nonsense of the characterization. Parody films are meant to parody and this one fails to come even close to funny, it irreverence is pathetic, not hilarious and the writers...well, where to start with them.
If you like watching pictures move and people talk, this film is probably for you. If you like films that are intelligent in their parody and genuinely funny, then stick to the Scary Movie catalogue. Even Date Movie was better than this and that's saying something.
This film trades on the pretension that it will be funny it is not, someone should report it to a fair trading body. I personally wonder what is more disturbing, that people would enjoy this movie, or that Hollywood thinks that people will enjoy it.
271 out of 370 people found the following comment useful :-
why do studios accept to make movies like this?!?, 26 January 2007
Author: bourgeoismarc-1 from Canada
There is nothing original here whatsoever-same old big breast jokes, oral sex jokes; sloppy tongue-kissing, spoofing of movies not necessarily worth spoofing, and using the same old actors (i.e. Adam Campbell) from other horrible spoofing movies. It is disappointing to see that actors who have received some acclaim from both critics and the public alike have starred in this-the worst movie ever made-worse than Grease 2. And only a few minutes longer than a regular TV show except without interesting commercials, it is highway robbery to make anyone pay to see this half-baked movie where writers, producers, actors and directors have only put half an effort to do something that at least would be satisfactory. And half is giving them too much credit. Unfortunately for Kal Penn, Jennifer Coolidge, Faune A. Chambers and Crispin Glover (you waited for this movie to return to the big screen? where were you last couple of years? in detox?), I won't be running to the theatre any time soon to see one of their movies any time soon.
Studio decision-makers have to take a stand against these movies-and so does the industry. Pre-teens, teens and young adults have shown that they have interests in seeing well-written, acted, developed and intelligent movies. Don't take the easy way out to do these useless piece of junk.
232 out of 317 people found the following comment useful :-
A movie so funny you'll forget to laugh., 26 January 2007
Author: mastermike569 from United States
Watching the previews for this movie I was expecting to have some good laughs. After watching the actual movie however I was extremely disappointed. 95% of the movie I didn't even have a little chuckle or a laugh. I ended up slightly laughing to some of the pathetic vulgar stuff. Even the potty humor in this movie was really really bad. ( Worse potty humor ever!) I am a pretty big fan of potty humor and immature stuff ... but what this movie had to offer was sadly disappointing with what was presented. Aside from the humor there was many rap music type scenes where the characters were participating in a lamed down style of a MTV music video... many of these scenes were unnecessary or too much and far from entertaining. They were more or less not enjoyable and far too many like them. Now to the good parts of the movie ... trust me I'm trying hard to find em! Many movies were parodied and you will probably recognize most of them and there is an occasional scene where they throw characters from other movies in for the hell of it just to have them in the movie. I also liked the rap dance scene (only one i liked) where they were doing a Pirates of the Caribbean rap dance. It reminded me of Captain Dan the Hip Hop Pirate..I wonder if they were trying to parody that guy? Well folks there wasn't much more to this movie other than a waste of time and disappointment.
170 out of 201 people found the following comment useful :-

Not actually a movie..., 30 January 2007
Author: solidgoldchimp from United Kingdom
...but rather just a list of movies that the filmmakers wanted to parody, strung together by the weakest plot in film history and a lot of unfunny jokes.
You would think that the team responsible for the mess of a movie that was Date Movie would at least have learned something from their last film to help them avoid the same mistakes, but they didn't.
It would appear they spent more time making parodies as visually accurate as they could and spent almost no time trying to make the film entertaining. Some of the parodies seem completely out of place and don't even fit into what little plot there is.
I couldn't recommend this film to anyone, not even those I hated.
150 out of 201 people found the following comment useful :-

Who the hell rated this movie a 10?, 30 January 2007
Author: Markus (all_we_need_is_a_drummer) from United Kingdom
Seriously people, i wasn't expecting much from this and i didn't get much. I at least expected a few laughs from it but i never got it. I think they let five year olds write the script for this crap. Very, very cliché spoof film, you could tell what was coming the whole way through (with a few stupid exceptions). They seriously need to stop spoof movies, i thought you couldn't get any worse than Scary Movie 4 but i was wrong. Writing a spoof takes no talent what so ever, just copy everyones ideas and "try" to make them funny. Now i could go on all day about how bad this movie is but I'm afraid i must go, everyone do yourself a favour, do not see this rubbish.
161 out of 242 people found the following comment useful :-

Please refer to reviews on Date Movie, 24 January 2007
Author: Mr_Happychaps from New Zealand
Some movies are funny, some are not. This movie may be funny to you, if you liked Date Movie, since both films are pretty much the same in cast and script quality.
Epic Movie is a loosely strung together collection of slap-stick comedy sketches based on various epic movies (Pirates of the Caribbean, Nacho Libre, Chronicles of Narnia, X-Men, Superman, etc...) so it's probably helpful if you have seen a few of the epics this movie takes off at, to understand the jokes used. (If you've seen the clips during MTV video awards, you get the idea on the kind of jokes I'm referring to). Epic Movie tries to cash in on the Scary Movie, Date Movie, "Movie" Movie franchise, but doesn't measure up to the originality shown in the Scary Movie series.
It doesn't take a genius to recommend that you save your box-office ticket money, and if you're interested, wait for the DVD, since this isn't an essential big screen movie.
119 out of 167 people found the following comment useful :-

Epic Movie is a Disaster of Epic Proportions, 26 January 2007
Author: Burleigh7
Alright, it wasn't that bad, but it was close. Sure the Scary Movie series as well as Date Movie were stupid and juvenile, but this is dumber than all the rest. There were a few chuckles, but overall it was mostly me groaning. Nearly every joke was tired and lame. They gave away all the "good" jokes in the trailer. Why Fred Willard and Jennifer Coolidge would be in this I have no idea. But Crispin Glover? The oddball actor who was so great in films like Back to the Future, River's Edge What's Eating Gilbert Grape and more? Yeah that's him all right, as Willy Wonka dancing around to crappy songs. So maybe my title was accurate.
130 out of 197 people found the following comment useful :-
Movie Is Not Worth Seeing, 26 January 2007
Author: devilmonkey_1192 from United States
I personally loved scary movies 1-3 but lately the creators haven't been that "creative". Scary movie 4, Date Movie, and this one Epic Movie, have been all the same humor lately, they aren't funny at all, i saw Epic Movie and i thought "You know what? I would've boughten 2 blockbuster movies instead of seeing this movie for 5 bucks. I couldn't believe it, i expected much more from them. There were some okay funny parts but the majority of the movie was annoying and i wanted it to end. All in all, if you haven't seen the trailer at all you will enjoy it, but the trailer spoils it all just like these past 3 movies they have done it that way.
Add another comment
Related Links