Is It Real? (2005– )

TV Series  -  Documentary | History
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.4/10 from 207 users  
Reviews: 2 user | 2 critic

Add a Plot

0Check in

Watch Now

on Amazon Instant Video

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 38 titles
created 15 Jun 2011
a list of 30 titles
created 11 Feb 2012
a list of 238 titles
created 21 Apr 2012
a list of 26 titles
created 17 Jul 2013
a list of 2130 titles
created 3 months ago

Related Items

Search for "Is It Real?" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Is It Real? (2005– )

Is It Real? (2005– ) on IMDb 7.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Is It Real?.

User Polls


4 | 3 | 2 | 1


2007 | 2006 | 2005



Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Monsterquest (TV Series 2007)
Documentary | History | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

The series explores strange and unknown creatures that have been allegedly spotted by witnesses in various parts of the country and the world.

Stars: Stan Bernard, Dale Pearson, Peter Schmitz
Ancient Discoveries (TV Series 2003)
Documentary | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

The remarkable story of Ancient Chinese inventions.

Stars: Christopher Kelly, Sean Barrett, Phil Crowley
Taboo (TV Series 2002)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  
Stars: Lance Lewman, Andres Williams, David McCallum
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.7/10 X  
Stars: Jean Claude Leuyer, Lyle Blackburn, Casey Hendershot
The Story of Science (TV Mini-Series 2010)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.1/10 X  
Stars: Michael J. Mosley, Robert W. Allan, Marlon Beale
Clash of the Gods (TV Series 2009)
Documentary | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  
Stars: Stan Bernard, Tate Steinsiek, Greg Ford
Modern Marvels (TV Series 1994)
Documentary | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.3/10 X  

Fast-paced, fun and informative, Modern Marvels is The History Channel's signature series focusing on historical technology. The series has focused (among other things) on wonders of ... See full summary »

Stars: Lloyd Sherr, Harlan Saperstein, Franklin D. Roosevelt
The Nostradamus Effect (TV Series 2009)
Documentary | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

Examines the Prophesies of 16th-century French physician Michel de Nostradamus and other ancient prophesy. It compares these prophesies with current global events and sorts significant prophesy from crackpot theory.

Stars: Joseph Eid, David Bradstreet, Farshad Farahat
Destination Truth (TV Series 2007)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

A globe-trekking reality show that follows Josh Gates around the world as he explores different sites of supernatural import.

Stars: Josh Gates, Gabriel Copeland, Mike Morrell
Unsealed: Alien Files II (TV Series 2012)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  
Stars: John Greenewald Jr., Mark Holmberg
Ancient Aliens (TV Series 2009)
Documentary | Fantasy | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  
Stars: Robert Clotworthy, Giorgio Tsoukalos, David Childress
Naked Science (TV Series 2004)
Documentary | Adventure
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  
Stars: Eric Meyers, Rushmore DeNooyer, Roger Tilling


Series cast summary:
 Himself - Narrator (16 episodes, 2005-2006)
 Himself - Narrator / ... (12 episodes, 2006-2007)
Joe Nickell ...
 Himself - Paranormal Investigator / ... (10 episodes, 2005-2006)


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis



Official Sites:



Release Date:

25 April 2005 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Verdade ou Mito?  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

10 stars for idea, 2 stars for the delivery = 6 stars
15 September 2008 | by (Poland) – See all my reviews

I've watched 10 episodes and everything was great, until I came upon guy named Benjamin Radford, who was posing as a great expert on everything and was just skipping the parts that he didn't have arguments for. Other "sceptics" were doing similar things, but he was just awesome - he just denies everything, no matter what.

Especially: - in "Big foot" he states that "eyewitnesses are not reliable"... well, great, so every single one case held in the court should be trailed once again without any whithesses

  • in "Psychics" he said "there isn't a single example that any psychic

ever helped police" - isn't it nice to meet someone who knows every single case in every single police in the world and in whole history of human kind...?

  • in "self Combustion" he said "the wick effect is explanation to those

cases"... well, almost - why people who are on fire for about 10 minutes DON'T WAKE UP??

But rest of the "sceptics" aren't much better: - in "Psychics" they said that one of them claims to do services for Scotland Yard, but Scotland Yard denies it... right, like British ever admit that they do have MI5, they admit Bloody Sunday was policemen fault... if you claim to be skeptic, then be skeptic all the way, not just when it meets your expectations

  • in "Psychics" one of them have done some test with good result, but

they just mention "it wasn't done properly" - why?? who said so?? what was wrong with the test??

  • in "Circles" they have "proved" that complicated thing like that

could be done in 5 hours... yeah, but they've done in almost 5 hours in the middle of the day, so what kind of prove is that??

  • in few cases they took up a really lame examples to show that there

isn't such thing as the topic, f.e. in UFO they took up some examples from Mexico that were easy to explain, but what about commercial movie of Comet (I think) when something was flying next to the plane... in "Psychics" this woman from Scotland who teaches how to be a psychic - oh, come on! besides she pointed out some place and they say she was fraud... so, who exactly checked this place she pointed out?? she was wrong because you say so??

  • in "Big foot" some guy told about something that he saw on the side

of the road and the explanations is... he was in shock, he didn't know what he saw... I don't know, but he didn't say anything about the shock, he just said that he saw something, but they said he didn't, so there - it is proved

  • in "UFO" the explanation for everything is suggestion based on sf

movies during cold war... wow, that explains everything, even the reports from countries that weren't under any pressure during the cold war, like Mexico, Chile or Brazil

After watching those episodes I was really disgusted by the level the creators presented - I mean in many cases they are right and all of this is a lot of cr*p, but they really should take more care about details and don't treat everyone as an idiot, because if I would believe in all of what this Benjamin Radford say (who btw. said that there are no such thing as lake monsters which doesn't stop him from publishing books about them) then I would say that people have never landed on the Moon!!!

Why? Because there are no proves that they did. Afterall eyewitnesses doesn't count, the samples could be rocks form some part of Earth, video material could be just illusion or fabrication... Besides I've never been to the Moon, I don't know anyone who were on the Moon, so there you have it - people have never landed on the Moon, because I said so... What's more there isn't any prove that this, so called, Moon even exists... This it the level of discussion that "Is it real?" represents most of the time.

11 of 19 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Why do skeptics always choose easiest to replicate? john-4316
New Narrator migraine55
ghosts episode the_moolag
Ripper episode sound drowns out the narrator templhaven
Skeptical explanations hader to believe than paranormal on this show. Bigalaz1
Discuss Is It Real? (2005) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page