MOVIEmeter
Top 5000
Up 272 this week

The Wolfman (2010)

R  |   |  Drama, Horror, Thriller  |  12 February 2010 (USA)
5.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.8/10 from 84,313 users   Metascore: 43/100
Reviews: 424 user | 348 critic | 36 from Metacritic.com

Upon his return to his ancestral homeland, an American man is bitten, and subsequently cursed by, a werewolf.

Director:

Writers:

(screenplay), (screenplay), 1 more credit »
Watch Trailer
0Check in
0Share...

Watch Now

From $2.99 on Amazon Instant Video

ON DISC

IMDb Picks: April

Visit our IMDb Picks section to see our recommendations of movies and TV shows coming out in April.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 35 titles
created 15 Oct 2010
 
a list of 44 titles
created 30 Nov 2010
 
a list of 44 titles
created 17 Jan 2014
 
a list of 24 titles
created 9 months ago
 
a list of 25 titles
created 3 months ago
 

Related Items

Search for "The Wolfman" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Wolfman (2010)

The Wolfman (2010) on IMDb 5.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Wolfman.

User Polls

Won 1 Oscar. Another 2 wins & 7 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
Mario Marin-Borquez ...
...
Cristina Contes ...
...
...
Malcolm Scates ...
...
Michael Cronin ...
...
...
Roger Frost ...
Edit

Storyline

Lawrence Talbot's childhood ended the night his mother died. His father sent him from the sleepy Victorian hamlet of Blackmoor to an insane asylum, then he goes to America. When his brother's fiancée, Gwen Conliffe, tracks him down to help find her missing love, Talbot returns to his father's estate to learn that his brother's mauled body has been found. Reunited with his estranged father, Lawrence sets out to find his brother's killer... and discovers a horrifying destiny for himself. Someone or something with brute strength and insatiable blood lust has been killing the villagers, and a suspicious Scotland Yard inspector named Aberline comes to investigate. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

Fear What Is Within See more »

Genres:

Drama | Horror | Thriller

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for bloody horror violence and gore | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

| |  »

Country:

Language:

|

Release Date:

12 February 2010 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

El hombre lobo  »

Box Office

Budget:

$150,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

£2,367,849 (UK) (12 February 2010)

Gross:

$61,937,495 (USA) (26 March 2010)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (unrated director's cut)

Sound Mix:

| |

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Is one of two werewolf films to win the Academy Award for Best Makeup (awarded in 2011 to Rick Baker and Dave Elsey). The first was An American Werewolf in London (1981) also given to Baker. See more »

Goofs

When Sir John Talbot is blowing out candles, they are clearly filament lamps, as the third candle lamp actually goes out before he blows on it. See more »

Quotes

[from trailer]
Lawrence Talbot: You have to leave.
Gwen Conliffe: What are you afraid of...?
See more »

Crazy Credits

The planet in the Universal logo glows white. See more »

Connections

References An American Werewolf in London (1981) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Doesn't beat the classic, but comes out a better remake than most recent ones
15 February 2010 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

Let me start by clarifying two things: 1) I'm a huge fan of horror Universal monster movies and the original Wolfman is a must see to me 2) I'm 18 so this review is not biased by age

The horror genre in particular suffers an overflow of remakes, reboots, etc today. Once in a while is okay, but there's far too many at once. This is nowhere near as bad as some (looking at you especially House on a Haunted Hill and Wicker Man) but this still didn't quite hit the mark. I wanted to see originality as long as it made sense and there were some interesting ideas here. There's also some pretty good scenes as well. The problem is that it's crippled by certain problems.

Let's start with the good things: Rick Baker was already loved for his effects in werewolf movies like An American Werewolf in London, and Wolf, as well as other movies where even if the movie's bad like Planet of the Apes, his work is excellent and kudos for getting him back. Baker clearly has respect for make-up legend Jack Pierce and the make-up is fantastic. I'm not a fan of CGI and I'm glad the movie cut itself down a bit although it did include it in some scenes. But Baker's work clearly shows.

Hugo Weaving was great and while Anthony Hopkins had a rougher start, he still did rather well. His character is harder than Rain's portrayal but in some ways it works. Certainly more than it did for his portrayal of Van Helsing in my eyes. The settings were fantastic. There's a lot of 19th century buildings that look gorgeous and act as a perfect contrast to the dark and creepy woods.

Now for the bad: The build-up in many scenes was rather limited. The asylum scene was okay, but many scenes could have built the tension better.

The acting from del Toro and Blunt was rather unemotional. I found Gwen Conliffe to be more supportive in this version, but Blunt's emotions were limited. She's a beautiful woman however no doubt. del Toro looks a bit like Lon Chaney Jr. and does well in the make-up, but the Larry side is bland. He's just not able to play it as tragically as Chaney. What's more while some complained that Chaney being Claude Rains son was absurd I can sooner believe in werewolves than the idea del Toro and Hopkins are kin.

Another flaw is the limited screen time of Maleva the old gypsy a key character in the original. She's okay in this, but given little to do which really ticks me off.

A big factor is the werewolf itself. In movies like the original Wolfman and Mummy there was a silent dread. The monsters showed their great power by intimidation alone and the idea they can kill you and go wild but prefer to stalk and plan. Both remakes made them more open to their power. The original's felt scarier without it, but the remakes make it work in their own way a bit.

I found this did better with the horror side than the emotional side. If Talbot was played as dramatically as in the original I think this might have done better. As a whole it's alright. Not too bad, but I can't say as memorable as the original.


131 of 206 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
This movie is good. paperchampionpictures
Really Underated mirabalw
What's the point of being a werewolf anyway? afn
Top ten reasons this movie flopped lunchbox0427
6.3? michael-colan
is it worth seeing the directors cut? xJBDx946
Discuss The Wolfman (2010) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page