Down 28 this week

Root of All Evil? (2006)

TV Movie  |   |  Documentary  |  9 January 2006 (UK)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.4/10 from 2,687 users  
Reviews: 17 user | 3 critic

Richard Dawkins' highly critical documentary attacks the pulsing heart of all mainstream religion- faith; with special focus on Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. Contains repeated ... See full summary »



0Check in

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Picks: April

IMDb's editors share the movies and TV shows they are excited to see in March.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 23 titles
created 14 Jun 2011
a list of 32 titles
created 25 May 2012
list image
a list of 42 titles
created 11 Sep 2012
a list of 44 titles
created 12 Jul 2013
a list of 32 titles
created 10 months ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Root of All Evil? (TV Movie 2006)

Root of All Evil? (TV Movie 2006) on IMDb 8.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Root of All Evil?.
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Documentary | Biography | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Did Jesus exist? This film starts with that question, then goes on to examine Christianity as a whole.

Director: Brian Flemming
Stars: Sam Harris, Robert M. Price, Richard Carrier
The Enemies of Reason (TV Movie 2007)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.4/10 X  

Scientist Richard Dawkins turns a hostile eye on the world of alternative medicine.

Director: Russell Barnes
Stars: Derren Brown, Deepak Chopra, Richard Dawkins
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.3/10 X  

Letting Go of God is a humorous monologue by Julia Sweeney chronicling her search for God. She begins in the Catholic church, the religion her family raised her in, and takes a Bible study ... See full summary »

Director: Julia Sweeney
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

Renowned scientists Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss cross the globe as they speak publicly about the importance of science and reason in the modern world.

Director: Gus Holwerda
Stars: Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Woody Allen, Richard Dawkins
Holy Wars (2010)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Take one Muslim advocate for global jihad and put him in a room with one conservative Christian on a mission to evangelize the world's Muslims. Which man will be left standing? Touching ... See full summary »

Director: Stephen Marshall
Stars: Khalid Kelly, Aaron D. Taylor, Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad Fostok
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3.7/10 X  

Ben Stein examines the issue of academic freedom and decides that there is none when it comes to the debate over intelligent design.

Director: Nathan Frankowski
Stars: Ben Stein, Lili Asvar, Peter Atkins
Documentary | History | News
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

The theory of evolution and a re-write of American history are caught in the crosshairs when an unabashed Creationist seeks re-election as chairman of America's most influential Board of Education.

Director: Scott Thurman
Stars: Rick Agosto, Lawrence Allen Jr., David Anderson
Religulous (2008)
Documentary | Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

Bill Maher's take on the current state of world religion.

Director: Larry Charles
Stars: Bill Maher, Tal Bachman, Jonathan Boulden
Short | Action | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

Upon the gust of an ill wind, a dollar travels down an evil path. Is this really the root of the evil?

Director: Nick Leisure
Stars: John Brokaw, Demetrius Dedmon, Maurrio Florese
Bill Maher: The Decider (TV Movie 2007)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

Comedian, writer and politically incorrect HBO talk-show host Bill Maher takes time off from his regular hosting duties to perform a hilariously scathing stand-up set in this comedy special... See full summary »

Director: John Moffitt
Stars: Bill Maher
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  
Director: Patrick McRee
Stars: Richard Dawkins, John Lennox, William H. Pryor
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.3/10 X  

Richard Dawkins is joined by Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens to discuss science, god, religion and much more.

Director: Josh Timonen
Stars: Richard Dawkins, Daniel C. Dennett, Sam Harris


Credited cast:
Yousef Al-Khattab ...
Richard Dawkins ...
Richard Harries ...


Richard Dawkins' highly critical documentary attacks the pulsing heart of all mainstream religion- faith; with special focus on Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. Contains repeated references to sectorial schools as child abuse and faith as the stepping stone to terrorist activity. Written by

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis







Release Date:

9 January 2006 (UK)  »

Also Known As:

The God Delusion  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


(2 episodes)


See  »

Did You Know?


Richard Dawkins has said that the title The Root of All Evil? was not his preferred choice, but that Channel 4 had insisted on it to create controversy. He wanted to title it "The God Delusion" after his book of the same name. Dawkins insisted that a question mark be added to the title because he does not believe that religion or anything is the root of evil. See more »


Ted Haggard: Sometimes it's hard for a human being to study the ear, or study the eye, and think that happened by accident.
Richard Dawkins: I beg your pardon, did you say by accident?
Ted Haggard: Yeah.
Richard Dawkins: What do you mean, by accident?
Ted Haggard: That the eye just formed itself somehow.
Richard Dawkins: Who says it did?
Ted Haggard: Well, some evolutionists say it did.
Richard Dawkins: Not a single one that I've ever met.
Ted Haggard: Really.
Richard Dawkins: Really. You obviously know nothing about the subject of evolution.
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A load of hypocritical rubbish
16 June 2008 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

I would like to make it very clear that I am not at all religious. I am an atheist but I could see that Richard Dorkins was contradicting himself over and over again. I would also like to make it known that I am not the sort of person that argues against something with philosophy all the time, but I feel that when comparing science and religion we must be philosophical and be willing to question the belief in main stream science as well as questioning religious beliefs.

I wonder if Richard Dorkins ever spends any time to think philosophically about belief, anyone who thinks long and hard enough about science and religion will realise that science is indeed a religion in itself. Yes there is a fundamental difference between the way that scientific beliefs are held when compared with other religions, but at it's roots, it's faith in a particular human instinct.

Throughout this series, Richard insists that science methods are the only right way of thinking and that it makes sense to believe in something only if the evidence for it is strong enough. If you dig deep enough into how science functions you'll realise that it is just as irrational as religion and that it comes down to faith in the end, faith in the evidence, faith in our sanity, faith in our senses but more than anything else faith in our instinct to follow patterns of recurrence.

This is not easy to explain but think about how the laws of physics were decided, it was because they were and still are the most common patterns of recurrence that we are aware of. I think that human beings have an instinct that makes them believe that the longer something remains in a certain state or place of existence the more we just assume out of blind FAITH that it is more likely to stay like it. For example, we don't expect that gravity will suddenly work in reverse tomorrow, by this I mean pushing matter away as supposed to attracting it. But the only reason why we don't expect this sudden change is because we have known for so long that it has always attracted as far as we are aware. However that doesn't mean that it couldn't do exactly the reverse tomorrow or even right now. It doesn't matter how long something may stay in a certain state or change, there is no rational reason to make assumptions about it but we do out of instinct. I would ask you to consider what is a long and short amount of time? There is no such thing, I don't know exactly how long it took for these supposed wise men to decide that everything must be made out of matter, Sound, Light, etc but lets give them what they would consider to be an edge way! Lets say far longer than it really was 12,00000000000 years! Is that a long period of time? 99999999999999999 years makes 12,00000000000 years seem like an incredibly short period of time. For all we know there could be an extreme amount of change in the so called laws of science within the next trillion years. It's all about comparison, only when we compare things can we say "that is long" or that is short. It's the same with big and small, wide and thin, heavy and light, strong and weak and others.

I doubt that any scientist could tell me why they think that trusting this instinct makes sense. I certainly don't see why it should, but that doesn't mean that we as humanity should necessarily stop using it. With this in mind, the most hypocritical comment that Richard Dorkins made was when he said that faith is irrational, "a process of non thinking" he said. If what we have in this instinct that I've been describing and this instinct that we all possess on some level isn't faith then I don't know what the hell it is. Other times when he is being hypocritical is when he talks about the religions being bronze age, "bronze age myths" he says. I would like to point out that no matter how much scientific methods have been changed over the years due to experience, experiments and evaluating, the pure rules of science are getting older and older all the time! They could even be described as the holy bible of science. He was going on about how he is sick of the different religions being stubborn " I am right, he is wrong" but looking back on how rude he was to the various interviewees, he seems to be just as stubborn him self. To be fair to him, at least he doesn't try to bomb religious communities. I appreciate his hatred for certain religious beliefs that generate war, but I don't respect his arrogance in his own beliefs.

As far as I'm concerned, Richard has the right to believe in science if that is his way. I am scientifically minded as well, but I don't think he has the right to go up to religious leaders having unfriendly arguments, trying to force his opinion on to them and virtually describing them as stupid. Despite all his education, experience and discoveries he seems to fail to have the wisdom to properly question his very own system of belief. I have read what he says in defence of this argument that open minded atheists such as my self put forward, What he states suggests to me that he is totally missing the point.

Finally the title of the documentary, Root Of All Evil. This states that religion is the root of all evil, it isn't true. There are causes of evil that have nothing to do with religion.

All round the documentary series was frustrating, narrow minded, hypocritical and flat-out rubbish.

20 of 171 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
The main bits that I have a complaint about Wyrmis
Favorite moment... JWJanneck
Not a Very good Documentry aarone2884
The God Delusion for dummies vertigoa
Haggard - another hypocrite bites the dust movie11
Broadcast in the USA? wendy-joy
Discuss Root of All Evil? (2006) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page