(2006)

Critic Reviews

23

Metascore

Based on 14 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
75
TV Guide
The original English scripts certainly were peppered with sly, topical asides aimed squarely at adults. Paul Bassett Davies' updated screenplay attempts to follow suit, but what passes for topical these days is pretty much limited to industry inside jokes and constant allusions other movies. Thankfully, the animation itself is thoroughly inspired.
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
The slapdash dialogue and smug vocal talent -- even the presence of the much-loved host of "The Daily Show" is wearying -- detract from the visual appeal of the most energetic sequences (like a raucous train chase) and what's left of Danot's designs.
40
The Hollywood Reporter
Strictly for the small-fry set, lacking the visual style, wit or imagination necessary to entice adult viewers.
38
New York Daily News
A dreadful animated movie stuffed with bad puns and little internal logic. More dangerous than the world icing over is the danger of eyeballs rolling back into the heads of parents accompanying kids to this.
25
It's a movie that scrounges so desperately for laughs, it features both a flatulent moose and a flatulent train.
25
New York Post
William H. Macy lends a little class as a snail, but Smith nails it in the closing-credit outtakes: "Don't expect Robin Williams-caliber work."
25
Charm-free, incoherent, and heartlessly sentimental, this woodenly animated co-production by American, British, and French companies offers boredom and irritation for parents, needlessly scary images for tots, and, for the pubescent boys who apparently run mass culture, a flatulent blue moose. It's ugly to look at, too.
25
Chicago Tribune
The polite word for all this is "repurposing," a euphemism for "hauling someone else's garbage."
11
Austin Chronicle
A wretched experience from start to finish.
0
Entertainment Weekly
An animated movie designed with very young children in mind. And very young children should be very angry about that. Where is it written that 4-year-olds don't deserve a good story, decent characters, and a modicum of coherence?

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Doogal (2006) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews | Message Board