A Supreme Court Justice dies, forcing the administration's hand on picking a desirable replacement who can be confirmed by a hostile Congress.

Director:

Writers:

(created by), | 1 more credit »
Reviews

Watch Now

From $1.99 on Amazon Video

ON DISC

Videos

1 video »
Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Senator Roland Pierce
...
...
...
Edit

Storyline

Josh's efforts to break the deadlock over judicial nominees is brought to a head by the death of a Supreme Court Justice. With the Republicans controlling Congress, the administration's chances of getting a replacement they want appear to be slim. Despite this, Josh and Toby begin back-channel negotiations over a radical scheme which could be exactly what the overly-moderate judicial system needs. Written by Murray Chapman

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

supreme court justice | See All (1) »

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

24 March 2004 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The case Mulready and Lang are speaking of is U.S. v Lopez, a landmark Supreme Court case in which the Supreme Court ended 50 years of precedents allowing Congress to federally mandate certain legal standards (including civil rights and federal gun control laws) based on a very liberal interpretation of the Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8. Clause 3) of the U.S. Constitution. See more »

Goofs

The characters state that there is no liberal on the court. In the first season Bartlett put Justice Mendoza on the bench, who was quite liberal. If for some reason Mendoza had left the bench, Bartlett would have appointed another liberal, so no matter what there would have been a democrat on the bench. See more »

Quotes

Josh Lyman: Obviously we're impressed with your record.
Toby Ziegler: Your work on the 14th Amendment in particular is the stuff that dreams were made of.
Josh Lyman: But before anything else, we want to gauge your interest level, this would certainly be a lifestyle...
Chief Justice Evelyn Baker Lang: We can just chat.
Josh Lyman: I'm sorry?
Chief Justice Evelyn Baker Lang: I hear you really went to bat for Erick Hayden.
Josh Lyman: I wish we could have gotten him confirmed
Toby Ziegler: Judge Lang, if the president...
Chief Justice Evelyn Baker Lang: Is he still teaching?
Josh Lyman: Erick? Yeah. Um, again, if we...
[...]
See more »

Connections

Referenced in Jeopardy!: Episode #22.196 (2006) See more »

Soundtracks

Mandolin Concerto in C Major
(uncredited)
Written by Antonio Vivaldi
Performed by Musici Di San Marco
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Brilliant episode
24 March 2007 | by (Denmark) – See all my reviews

This episode leaves me with a good feeling. I have to admit that I had misty eyes all through the last half hour. And its difficult to claim that "West Wing" usually does that to the viewers.

The reason for my joy for this episode is two-folded. First of all there is Glenn Close, perfectly casted as a liberal judge. Second there is the message, that the gloomy impression of a Left and Right in USA, unable to communicate, is not true.

The beauty lies in the compromise that does not look like the usual compromise. Instead of victory for the mediocre, we see a victory of the genius.

This episode is also the last high peak before the series finally loses its momentum.


18 of 22 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Sam Seaborn rolaca
Are there any episodes you skip? Whedonbuff
Doesn't really matter but just saying... pmac7902
Just a little pet peeve . . . goleary-78836
Toby was never more right than in the ep "17 People". MyNameIsOliverQueen
Am I suppose to like Josh? nicole-luna15
Discuss The Supremes (2004) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?