"Tales of the Unexpected" Proof of Guilt (TV Episode 1980) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A very clever little mystery.
Sleepin_Dragon13 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Mr Chillingham's personal secretary Clarissa opens his Office door to discover him shot dead on the floor, in the Office is the cool and collected George Stamford, very cool and calm considering the occurrence, the only thing missing is the murder weapon. Called in is Chief Inspector Walters. Mr Stamford denies murder, and being in a locked room on the Sixth floor the case against him looks water tight. A desperate search by the Police team to discover the murder weapon begins.

Enough intrigue and mystery in this episode to keep your interest, it keeps you engaged. You keep asking yourself 'Did he, or didn't he?' What should have been an open and shut case, turns into something more complex, the story definitely builds up.

No introduction from Roald Dahl, it's the first episode I think we didn't get one from him, a sign of things to come. I always liked his introductions.

Jeremy Clyde always makes a good villain, he's played quite a few over the years. Roy Marsden equally as good, in turn has always played the role of Detective many times, I wonder how it would have played out had the roles been reversed.

Very clever and suspenseful, it does its job in getting you thinking and asking questions. Enjoyable, 7/10
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You'll never see it coming!
raja_sarkar16 April 2020
Until you reach the last half (about 24 minutes into it), you'll not be able to guess the METHOD.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Make sure your lads give him a right going over" Pretty good tale of the unexpected.
poolandrews18 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Tales of the Unexpected: Proof of Guilt starts like any other ordinary morning in London, secretary Clarissa Tower (Elizabeth Richardson) is going about her work as normal when she hears a gunshot come from the office of her boss Mr Chillingham, she unlocks the door & sees him dead on the floor having been shot in the neck & a George Stamford (Jeremy Clyde) sitting there smoking. The police are notified & Chief Inspector Walters (Roy Marsden) is on the case which seems on the surface very simple, however while he has motive, means & opportunity he has no murder weapon. There is not one single trace of any weapon or a single shred of evidence to suggest George had or fired one so how did he shoot Chillingham inside a locked room if he didn't have a gun?

This Tales of the Unexpected story was episode 3 from season 3 that originally aired here in the UK during August 1980, directed by Chris Lovett this is another crime themed Tales of the Unexpected rather than a horror or supernatural one & is pretty good. The story by Bill Pronzini was dramatised by Johnny Byrne & has a fascinating central premise of a seemingly simple case of murder but on closer inspection would appear to be impossible to have been committed by the only suspect. It certainly has a attention grabbing hook & it kept me watching throughout to see what really happened which in the end was a bit of a disappointment, as I watch more of these Tales of the Unexpected episodes it's clear what sort of style the production team went for & I always try to put myself in their position & how they would end these episodes as opposed to the obvious & I generally always find myself guessing the outcome correctly & Proof of Guilt is no different as I had figured out how Goeorge did it within 15 minutes & I was right which sort of disappointed me but there you go. Also there is no way he could have done what was suggested, from the time of the shot to when the secretary entered the office there is no way on Earth he could have achieved what he was said to have & it's as simple as that. Still, as an interesting piece of crime mystery it's worth a watch.

Technically this is alright, a lot of these old British TV show's had pretty low budgets & I'm sure Tales of the Unexpected was no exception. As usual time hasn't been kind to this, from the hideous fashions to horrible cars & just check out those ancient police vehicles! The acting was alright from the usual familiar cast of Brit actors.

Proof of guilt is a neat little Tales of the Unexpected episode which fans of the show will like but I couldn't help but think the ending was a bit routine & anyone good at guessing these sorts of twists will figure this one out as I did, at only 30 odd minutes in length it's worth a watch though.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I miss Roald's introduction
safenoe7 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The early episodes of Tales of the Unexpected featured Roald "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" Dahl's introductions as he sat back in his lounge seat beside a fireplace. I'm not sure if this was filmed in his home or in a studio.

Unfortunately there's no Roald Dahl introduction in this episode, which is a whodunnit and also howdunnit. How did the alleged murderer commit the deed in an office that would make David Brent proud in Slough.

The police make every effort to find out how the murder was committed, and the audience is left scratching their head big time until the final twist at the end.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Ahh, the gentlemen of the law."
classicsoncall14 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
You'll have to watch this episode right to the very end for the twist and you still won't believe it. Now I've heard of people with a predilection for arcane diets, and you may have learned of carnival side show freaks who eat pins, nails, and the like, but what are the odds one of them would also be a murderer? Obviously this show will keep you guessing, and I can't say that the payoff was altogether worth it, coming out of left field as it did. Up until this episode, Roald Dahl would always have something to say by way of introduction, but for some reason he stayed away from this one. Maybe it was because of George Stamford's (Jeremy Clyde) 'magnetic' personality.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent Episode
njboden21 December 2020
This is a highly imaginative episode that kept me guessing until the end. From the point of the cop denying the suspect's lawyer access to his client if not before, I feel no shame in saying that I rooted for the so-called 'villain', the criminal mastermind, rather than the cop though.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed