Studio One in Hollywood (1948–1958)
5.5/10
35
3 user

A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court 

Director:

(as Franklin Schaffner)

Writers:

, (novel) (as Samuel Clemens)
Reviews

On Disc

at Amazon

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Episode credited cast:
...
...
...
Salem Ludwig ...
Merlin
Loretta Daye ...
Robert Duke ...
Clarence
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
...
Herself - Commercial Spokeswoman
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

character name in title | See All (1) »

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

19 May 1952 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Soundtracks

Introduction from "Le Coq d' Or"
Music by Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Karloff Steals a Rather Weak Version of Story
22 December 2011 | by (Louisville, KY) – See all my reviews

Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, A (1952)

** (out of 4)

Made-for-TV version of the classic Mark Twain story is from "Studio One in Hollywood" and features a fine cast but they can't save the end result. After a knock on the head, Hank Morgan (Thomas Mitchell) is sent back in time and finds himself dealing with King Arthur (Boris Karloff) who at first is disturbed by this man but soon the two end up on a mission together. I had heard quite a bit about this TV movie but sadly the end results really weren't as good as I was hoping for. The attractive cast deliver fine performances but there are just way too many weak ends and these are what really keep the film from working. I'll start off with the negative stuff and we can begin with the story. The spirit of Twain's novel is certainly here but it just never comes across as being any good. It really does seem like they took some interesting ideas but left more interesting things in the book. Another problem is the actual production, which just looks extremely cheap even for this type of production. Just take a look at the sets and it almost seems as if the actors are doing a rehearsal on the sets that aren't yet finished. At times it's hard to tell whether you're in Arthur's time or the present. Even though this runs a short 60-minutes the running time almost feels twice as long as the direction really isn't all that impressive and there's never any good rhythm going on. The one thing that does keep the movie somewhat watchable are the performances. I found Mitchell to be going over-the-top a bit too much but this actually gives the film a spark of life. Karloff easily steals the film in his fun-natured performance and I'd guess that it will be mainly his fans who get the most pleasure out of this version of the story.


0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
1984 darthmike-1
the talented mr. ripley mikeijames
sentence of death anthonytrent-1
Mrs Arris Goes to Paris chrisrogers2002
Episode : THE SILENT GUN 1956 NormaBates88
Fred Gwynne? millere-2

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?