Home
search
more | tips
SHOP STAR TREK
Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.co.uk Amazon.de Amazon.fr
IMDb > "Star Trek" Charlie X (1966)
Prev | 3 of 80 Episodes | Next

"Star Trek"
Charlie X (1966)


advertisement
Register or login to rate this title
User Rating: 7.1/10 (306 votes)

Overview

Director:
Lawrence Dobkin
Writers:
Gene Roddenberry (creator)
Gene Roddenberry (story) ...
more
TV Series:
"Star Trek" (1966)
Original Air Date:
15 September 1966 (Season 1, Episode 2)
Genre:
Sci-Fi | Adventure more
Plot:
Captain Kirk must learn the limits to the power of a 17-year-old boy with the psychic ability to create anything and destroy anyone. full summary | add synopsis
User Comments:
I'm Not a Man and I Can Do Anything - you can't more

Cast

 (Episode Credited cast)
Create a character page for: ?

Additional Details

Runtime:
60 min
Country:
USA
Language:
English
Color:
Color
Aspect Ratio:
1.33 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Mono

Fun Stuff

Trivia:
Gene Roddenberry has an uncredited cameo as the voice of the galley chief who says to Kirk, "Sir, I put meat loaf in the ovens. There's turkeys in there now... real turkeys!" more
Goofs:
Continuity: When Kirk and Spock enter Rand's quarters, Charlie hurls them back against the wall. When Spock slumps to the floor, we can see that the set wall behind Spock's head has been damaged. However, in later shots in the same scene, the damage is gone. more
Quotes:
Capt. Kirk: There are a million things in this universe you can have and a million things you can't have. It's no fun facing that, but that's the way things are.
Charlie Evans: Then what am I going to do?
Capt. Kirk: Hang on tight and survive. Everybody does.
more
Movie Connections:
Referenced in Star Trek: Of Gods and Men (2007) (V) more

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful:-
I'm Not a Man and I Can Do Anything - you can't, 17 June 2006
7/10
Author: Bogmeister from United States

Though this was aired in front of "Where No Man Has Gone Before," it's not the first Trek story to feature a human being acquiring extraordinary powers - that would be the aforementioned 2nd pilot for the show. The angle with this episode is that the human being in question is a teenager, 17-year-old Charles Evans (well played by actor Walker, in his mid-twenties at the time). It's bad enough when adults get delusions of godhood; when it's a teen, all bets are off. Kirk brings on a sector worth of trouble on board his ship when he accepts a transfer of a young guest from a smaller ship. The Charlie character spent all his years up to this point on some planet without other human beings. His introduction to the fairer sex (Yeoman Rand - probably Whitney's best episode) is painful in itself; his growing pains are accentuated by his complete ignorance of common social customs.

All this is uncomfortable to watch because Walker imparts an uneasy, twitchy psychosis to his character but then, in the second half of the episode, he reveals his unlimited powers - he literally seems able to do anything, whether making people disappear or transforming them into lizards. The story now begins to take on a more horrific tone; in his frustration, Charlie is not beyond torturing crew members, terrorizing the entire ship. This is alienation taken to the nth degree. The episode makes a strong case for the issue of parental control - even more on the topic of maturing without parents (think of the story of Superman/Clark Kent, for example, and if he'd grown up without the influence of the Kents; this has been on display for the past few years on the series "Smallville"). In this particular episode, the parental duties fall on Kirk, but it's too little too late - far too late. One drawback of this episode: an extended scene of Uhura singing about Spock and then Charlie - the one point that Charlie's surreptitious use of his powers seemed warranted.

As with most of the Trek episodes in the original series, the strongly structured scripts included excellent endings, as is the case here. There are no pat unrealistic conclusions, i.e. a happy ending, where-in Charlie is somehow able to remain with the human race (due to the miraculous removal of his powers, for example). No, even in this sector of space, you reap what you sow and things are not solved for you. There's a genuinely tragic tone to the ending - Charlie's main weakness, after all, was just a great need for other people to like him. That need will never be fulfilled at the end. As with the previously aired "Man Trap," total incompatibility between two sets of entities shows that some things are beyond our ability to set right, even with future technology.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more

Message Boards

Discuss this title with other users on IMDb message board for "Star Trek" (1966)

Related Links

Main series Episode guide Full cast and crew
Company credits External reviews IMDb TV section
IMDb Sci-Fi section IMDb USA section Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.