Quantum Leap (1989–1993)
1 user 3 critic

Play It Again, Seymour - April 14, 1953 

Sam leaps into a private detective who looks just like Humphrey Bogart.



(created by), (teleplay) | 4 more credits »

Watch Now

From $1.99 (SD) on Amazon Video



Episode complete credited cast:
Allison Grimsley
Tony Heller ...
Nick Allen
Steve Nevil ...
Lt. Lannon
Old Lady
Don Maxwell ...
Barbara London ...
Ron Ulstad ...


It's the early 1950s an Sam has leaped into the body of a New York City private detective, Nick Allen. Apart from the fact that Allen bears a striking resemblance to Humphrey Bogart, Sam feels that he has leaped into a cheap pulp novel, something that proves to be all too accurate when he realizes he knows the story and is constantly having a sense of déjà vu. With his partner murdered, Sam has to not only find the murderer but launch the career of a prospective writer. Written by garykmcd

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis




Release Date:

17 May 1989 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:


Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


In the original history, Nick Allen was murdered on April 15, 1953 and Allison Grimsley and Seymour disappeared the same night. See more »


Obvious use of stunt double in the elevator shaft. See more »


Dr. Sam Beckett: I read this book Nick's writing. That's why I know everything. It's not déjà vu.
Admiral Al Calavicci: Another illusion shattered forever.
Dr. Sam Beckett: Nick and Alison loved each other but they were too loyal to Phil to do anything about it. Listen to this: "The heat between us was like a six-day jaunt in the Sahara, but out ties to Phil were as tight as the drunk on the corner stool."
Admiral Al Calavicci: Not exactly Faulkner.
Dr. Sam Beckett: You can say that again. I think I'm here to find Phil's killer so that Allison and I can live happily ever after.
Admiral Al Calavicci: Sam, ...
See more »


References Play It Again, Sam (1972) See more »


Blue Moon
Music by Richard Rodgers (1935)
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

S1: A little soapy at times, but does well by focusing on Sam/Al and constructing around that, not just the drama of the week – although also then doing that too
18 September 2016 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

There is always a bit of trepidation when it comes to revisiting a show which you last watched in your childhood; often you remember stuff with overly affectionate memories. With Quantum Leap this was less the case, since I remember it as a weekly show on BBC2, and although I watched it each time, it was not something that really left a big mark on me. It is interesting to view it back with a slightly more critical eye, to see how the first season is constructed.

The starting point is very much Sam, Al, and the project. The main stories tend to be a little on the soapy side, and mostly they are strong enough to really make you care about the characters or their situation on a very deep level. It is wise then that Sam and Al are strong characters, because our engagement with them brings us into any specific story. This also explains some of the seemingly weaker decisions – eg the chance that Sam would leap close (and unrelated) to a previous (future) partner is unlikely, but it does help us engage with him (and is certainly more interesting than the story he actually is there for). There are some weaker episodes in terms of resolution (Piggy Sue is not funny enough as an idea to cover for it as the end of an episode which was otherwise a so-so romance). Mostly though it is fun enough.

The performances are likable even if a bit soft. Bakula is a good lead; likable and quite easy to watch. Meanwhile Stockwell is fun even if some of his non-PC mannerisms are a little dated now, and perhaps limit him as a character of fun. The always changing support cast are mostly pretty good, doing solid jobs with no time to develop a character. For sure it is broad perhaps, but they are background and at least they mostly avoid full-on cliché (although sometimes this is the goal, and it works). It never totally shakes off the soapy element of many of the stories, but it has good core focus to draw the viewer in, and is delivered with a good ear for humor and drama to make for easy entertainment with lots of potential.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
How to start watching this? Lancer01
Netflix Taking Show Down? pixel_pancake
Darn tear jerker episodes:( oldskul_luver
Netflix....what gives. enchanting1791
The rules changing on any reboot master_fromthecrown
The Camakazi Kid: Michael Jackson labybyron

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: