Perry Mason: Season 6, Episode 28

The Case of the Witless Witness (16 May 1963)

TV Episode  -   -  Crime | Drama | Mystery
8.4
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.4/10 from 53 users  
Reviews: 4 user

Judge Daniel Redmond has been nominated to run for Lt. Governor due to his high level of respect. However, he soon finds himself being forced to turn it down due to an accusation of fraud and then murdering the witness against him.

Director:

Writers:

(characters created by), (teleplay), 2 more credits »
0Check in
0Share...

On Disc

at Amazon

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Picks: March

IMDb's editors share the movies and TV shows they are excited to see in March.

Related Items

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Case of the Witless Witness (16 May 1963)

The Case of the Witless Witness (16 May 1963) on IMDb 8.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Perry Mason.
« Previous Episode | 181 of 271 Episodes | Next Episode »
Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
Lt. Tragg (credit only)
Wesley Lau ...
Robert Middleton ...
Judge Daniel Redmond
...
Victor Kendall
...
Gus Sawyer
Steve Brodie ...
Quinn Torrey
Florida Friebus ...
Marian Lamont
Rita Lynn ...
Madge Eberly
...
Martin Weston
Lee Bergere ...
James Wall
Harry Holcombe ...
Senator Deering
Edit

Storyline

Perry loses a civil case in appellate court, but soon has a murder case, with the judge who ruled against him as defendant. Perry will need to wade through a "perfect" fraud and long chains of finger-pointing to exonerate the judge. Newspaper publisher Victor Kendall, a perennial candidate for Lt Governor, loses the nomination to respected Judge Daniel Redmond. Kendall then attends a U.S. Senate subcommittee hearing, where cooperating witness Martin Weston is flabbergasted to hear himself involved in a 20-year-old fraud case. The committee adjourns to give Weston a chance to "refresh his memory". Kendall then goes to Redmond and accuses him of also being involved in the fraud. Weston also says that the judge profited from the scheme. In fact, all he did was, when questioned at a party, to describe a fraud case he'd just prosecuted, giving the schemers the idea of how to avoid the mistakes of the earlier crime. Redmond's old flame Madge Everly was there, but she refuses to help him. ... Written by arthurblock

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Genres:

Crime | Drama | Mystery

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

16 May 1963 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Westrex Recording System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Perry Mason did lose one case during the series. During the very beginning scene in a courtroom in this episode, the judge and Perry Mason are discussing Perry Mason's losing a case by arguing bad law. The judge suggested Perry take it to a higher court but Perry told the judge it wouldn't be worth it since the judge's decisions hadn't been overturned in 20 years. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Excellent courtroom scenes make this episode enjoyable
9 October 2012 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

In this fine episode, Perry defends a respected Judge on murder charges after his named is linked to an Federal Investigation involving fraud that happened some twenty years ago.

The Judge, Daniel Redmond, is a man with high integrity for the law. He has just beaten Victor Kendall for nomination for Lt Governor of California, when he gets word that his name has been mentioned in a Federal Investigation for fraud. When he starts asking questions about the investigation it seems that many people believe that Judge Redmond has connections to the fraud and may have even bought the Judge's seat.

The Judge's old friend, Martin Weston, is set to appear before the committee the next day. However Mr Weston is found dead and the evidence points to Judge Redmond as the main suspect. Perry is asked to defend his friend on the charges brought by Hamilton Burger's office.

This episode was a pleasant change of pace from the norm. There are some great courtroom scenes that haven't been witnessed since season one. Perry is at the top of his game as he questions each witness to finally get to the truth. Even with many people taking the 5th amendment during cross-examination - enough of the story comes to light to provide Perry with a satisfactory ending. Great watch.


5 of 5 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
why was perry in the hospital? susanramsey919
How famous was Perry Mason? charleshjamesiii
How well did Perry and Paul do financially? charleshjamesiii
Surprising guest star slackersmom
People You Know Are Trouble dreamcurse
if a lawyer never lost a case??? savair1
Discuss The Case of the Witless Witness (1963) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?