Perry Mason (1957–1966)
4 user

The Case of the Witless Witness 

Judge Daniel Redmond has been nominated to run for Lt. Governor due to his high level of respect. However, he soon finds himself being forced to turn it down due to an accusation of fraud and murdering the witness against him.



(characters created by), (teleplay) | 2 more credits »

On Disc

at Amazon


Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?



Episode cast overview, first billed only:
Lt. Tragg (credit only)
Judge Daniel Redmond
Victor Kendall
Gus Sawyer
Quinn Torrey
Marian Lamont
Rita Lynn ...
Madge Eberly
Martin Weston
James Wall
Senator Deering


Perry loses a civil case in appellate court, but soon has a murder case, with the judge who ruled against him as defendant. Perry will need to wade through a "perfect" fraud and long chains of finger-pointing to exonerate the judge. Newspaper publisher Victor Kendall, a perennial candidate for Lt Governor, loses the nomination to respected Judge Daniel Redmond. Kendall then attends a U.S. Senate subcommittee hearing, where cooperating witness Martin Weston is flabbergasted to hear himself involved in a 20-year-old fraud case. The committee adjourns to give Weston a chance to "refresh his memory". Kendall then goes to Redmond and accuses him of also being involved in the fraud. Weston also says that the judge profited from the scheme. In fact, all he did was, when questioned at a party, to describe a fraud case he'd just prosecuted, giving the schemers the idea of how to avoid the mistakes of the earlier crime. Redmond's old flame Madge Everly was there, but she refuses to help him. ... Written by arthurblock

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis


Crime | Drama | Mystery





Release Date:

16 May 1963 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

(Westrex Recording System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Perry Mason did lose one case during the series. During the very beginning scene in a courtroom in this episode, the judge and Perry Mason are discussing Perry Mason's losing a case by arguing bad law. The judge suggested Perry take it to a higher court but Perry told the judge it wouldn't be worth it since the judge's decisions hadn't been overturned in 20 years. See more »


[first lines]
Commentator: Now, to the political news. Attention focused this morning on the pre-convention caucus meeting in the Los Angeles Hotel to select nominees for the slate of state officers. Of particular concern is the nominee for the office of lieutenant governor. Most experts agreed the shoo-in for the job was the man who has unsuccessfully sought it for the past 12 years, Victor Kendall, publisher of "The Clarion." But a sudden dark horse has loomed into contention. The feeling in informed ...
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Excellent courtroom scenes make this episode enjoyable
9 October 2012 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

In this fine episode, Perry defends a respected Judge on murder charges after his named is linked to an Federal Investigation involving fraud that happened some twenty years ago.

The Judge, Daniel Redmond, is a man with high integrity for the law. He has just beaten Victor Kendall for nomination for Lt Governor of California, when he gets word that his name has been mentioned in a Federal Investigation for fraud. When he starts asking questions about the investigation it seems that many people believe that Judge Redmond has connections to the fraud and may have even bought the Judge's seat.

The Judge's old friend, Martin Weston, is set to appear before the committee the next day. However Mr Weston is found dead and the evidence points to Judge Redmond as the main suspect. Perry is asked to defend his friend on the charges brought by Hamilton Burger's office.

This episode was a pleasant change of pace from the norm. There are some great courtroom scenes that haven't been witnessed since season one. Perry is at the top of his game as he questions each witness to finally get to the truth. Even with many people taking the 5th amendment during cross-examination - enough of the story comes to light to provide Perry with a satisfactory ending. Great watch.

14 of 14 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: