Perry Mason: Season 6, Episode 17

The Case of the Libelous Locket (7 Feb. 1963)

TV Episode  -   -  Crime | Drama | Mystery
7.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.8/10 from 48 users  
Reviews: 4 user

Janice Norland turns to her law professor when she thinks she killed a man. When there is no body, they assume all is okay but she is soon the target of blackmail. When the man turns up dead, she is charged so the professor defends her.

Director:

Writers:

(based upon characters created by),
0Check in
0Share...

On Disc

at Amazon

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Case of the Libelous Locket (07 Feb 1963)

The Case of the Libelous Locket (07 Feb 1963) on IMDb 7.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Perry Mason.
« Previous Episode | 170 of 271 Episodes | Next Episode »
Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
Lt. Tragg (credit only)
Wesley Lau ...
...
Patrice Wymore ...
...
...
Harry von Zell ...
Patricia Manning ...
Carlos Romero ...
Dan Seymour ...
Michael Fox ...
Coroner
Edit

Storyline

Professor Edward Lindley is a highly respected law school professor who believes that jurists and academics deserve credit for the maturing of the law, not trial lawyers. That belief is soon tested when one of his students, Janice Norland, gets into trouble. She believes she's killed a dance instructor she was involved with, Raul Perez. They'd had a fight and she hit him with a poker but when they check out his apartment, there is no body and no sign of the struggle Janice had described. Lindley turns to Paul Drake to investigate and Paul thinks he sees an all too common blackmail racket. The next day Janice receives a photo showing her standing over the body hold the fireplace poker and a phone call asking for $10,000. But when the dance instructor is found dead the next night in the same manner after Janice was seen there, she is charged with murder. With Perry Mason in the hospital, Lindley decides to defend her himself and learns a few lessons about being a trial lawyer. Written by garykmcd

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Crime | Drama | Mystery

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

7 February 1963 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Westrex Recording System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

When Raymond Burr missed several episodes due to illness, he was replaced by several guest attorneys who were played by Bette Davis, Walter Pidgeon, Hugh O'Brian and Mike Connors. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Even the actors were uninterested in this plot
24 September 2012 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

Michael Rennie is the special guest star as he plays Professor Edward Lindley who is a law teacher in a prestigious school. One of his students, Maureen Norland, comes to him for help after she believes she killed Raul Perez with a fire-place poker after a struggle. When Professor Lindley and Maureen go to the apartment where the murder was to have happened- everything was in place and Perez body was no where to be found.

Later Maureen receives a photo in the mail standing over the body of Perez with the poker in her hand. She is going to be blackmailed for $10,000 or the photo will be exposed to the police.

When Maureen agrees to pay the blackmail, she returns to the apartment. She finds Perez's body in the same position as when she did when she hit him over the head. Now Maureen will need an attorney for the charge of murder that Hamilton Burger's office files. But with Perry in the hospital it will be Professor Lindley, with the help of Paul and Della, that defends Maureen in court on the charges.

During testimony in court we learn that most the information given was incorrect. We will have to reevaluate the entire mystery as it makes many twist along the way.

With the story getting amusing - we then get one of those cheap confessions that make you want to pull on your hair. Without any suspicion someone from the gallery confesses without the slightest bit of evidence. The viewer feels cheated for the way this mystery comes crashing down.

Other than William Hopper, the rest of the cast seemed almost robotic in their performance. Michael Rennie, a fine actor, make his guest appearance seem stuffy and boring. I do not think he changed facial expressions the entire time.- The defendant Maureen, played by Patrice Wymore, seemed more suited to play character #8 - 'woman on sidewalk'- than to be given a lead part on this show. Her performance was lacking in emotion and interest that tend to make the show almost unwatchable.

Here is to Perry making a quick recovery.


4 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Clay's Grille rditewig801
Paul on trial, but cover-up is covered up slackersmom
Perry gets ribald slackersmom
The butler never did it pc-privconfounder
It CAN'T be him/her! pc-privconfounder
How Perry can afford to defend all those deadbeat clients pc-privconfounder
Discuss The Case of the Libelous Locket (1963) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?