"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Hooked (TV Episode 2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Spiraling downward
bkoganbing15 January 2014
A 15 year old girl's body is found with some signs of sexual intercourse and the SVU squad is on the case. She's even got a fake ID and the first call that Benson and Stabler make is to the parent of her cousin who gave her the fake ID.

It's tough to lose a parent as an adolescent, you have trouble handling it at any age, but the story that evolves over a six month time that Christopher Meloni and Mariska Hargitay uncover is one of a young girl who was a good student to one that just spirals downward out of control. The young lady also was HIV positive, a fact that M.E. Tamara Tunie discovers with the autopsy.

The victim's best friend is Hayden Panettiere and every time our detectives question her they get misinformation and outright lies. Panettiere who was swinging right along with the deceased has much to hide.

Meloni and Hargitay uncover a lot of sex partners that include a doctor who likes them young in Alex Cranmer and a sleazy porn producer in Matt Malloy. Another murder victim pops up during the course of the investigation.

A nice job done all around by the regulars and the cast.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Murderous addiction
TheLittleSongbird24 February 2021
My previous watches of "Hooked" have always seen me hold a very high opinion of it. A few of the highlights being a well developed Stabler (he to me was very interesting this season, though do know people that weren't so crazy seeing him more angsty), an unforgettably shocking ending in an episode full of surprises and an atypically cast at the time Hayden Panettiere. Admittedly though, it did take a couple of viewings to understand everything straightaway.

All of those positive feelings on "Hooked" held up brilliantly on my recent rewatch. It is actually one of those episodes that got better and better with each viewing with more gotten out of it and observed each time. "Hooked" is a marked improvement over the previous episode "Game" (don't dislike that episode though), though it is not quite on the same level as the four particularly brilliant episodes in a row that preceeded that. Close though.

Production values are slick and professional, not ever resorting to cheap or untested gimmicks or anything. The music is haunting in the right places and isn't constant or too loud, and the direction gives the drama urgency and breathing space. The acting is one of the best aspects of "Hooked". As well as his tough side, it was great to see more of Christopher Meloni's more empathetic side. Panettiere shows a side to her that one wouldn't think she had in her judging from her previous roles (she has matured a lot since for example voicing Dot in 'A Bug's Life' less than a decade before).

It is not easy not making a compulsive liar too annoying or too impossible to like, but Panettiere avoids that and despite hating what she says she is layered enough to have made me by the end understand her. The script is tight and beautifully balanced in tone, with a tight structure and a wide range of emotions.

Similarly loved the story, which is one of the most unpredictable and cleverest of Season 6. Where one thinks they know the truth more than once but are led in another direction once again in a way that doesn't become too dizzying or too confusing. And in a way that continually surprises, which is truly remarkable for an episode that has so many twists and turns. The identity of the responsible, the motive and the rationale all left me floored.

My only issue with "Hooked" was that some of the team were on the underused side.

Other than that, wonderful. 9/10
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good episode until the ending
johnritter4ever9 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I thought this episode took a lot of good twists & turns but why did Angela need to kill the doctor to get the tape back? If he was worried about getting in trouble for having sex with 2 underage girls if the tape got out, and Angela was worried someone would see her in the tape then why didn't they both just agree to destroy it? Really poor thinking on the writers' part. And not sure I liked Stabler comforting her at the end. The girl who lied to him & Benson throughout the episode didn't deserve a "Dad's" compassion.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great Episode, But a GIANT Hole in the Plot
dstryker-928445 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This episode could have easily been a 10. The writing, the story, the casting, the investigation, etc, all great in this episode. It didn't feel repetitive, didn't seem like a story they've told before, the characters were well layered and complex. Hayden Panettiere was the perfect casting choice for the character she played. The only reason it gets a 6, the is a giant gaping massive hole in the plot that ruins the ending, which in turn kind of ruins the entire episode.

***SPOILER*** * * * * * * * * * The hole in the story, the second murder makes no sense and the way they discovered the evidence makes even less sense.

Hayden's character claims she killed the doctor because he wouldn't give her the sex tape they made, but says he wouldn't give it to her BECAUSE he would be in trouble if it got out. I'm going to skip right over 2 other issues, one being if Hayden's character was so desperate to make sure no one would ever see the tape, why did she keep it? The first thing she would have done is destroy the tape (which is apparently what they both wanted), so there is no reasoning as to why she would keep the tape. She had for days, she could have destroyed it, recorded over it, burned it, thrown it away into a public city dumpster, anything would make more sense than keeping the tape in your locker. Second issue I'm overlooking, it makes no sense for the doctor to be this concerned when it's already out. They know he had an ongoing sexual relationship with a minor, etc etc. His family knew, the police knew, the added charge of making child porn is so far down the list of the crimes they already knew, that it doesn't make too much sense as to why he would be that concerned. But ignoring that, these two people wanted the same thing. She wanted to make sure no one saw the tape, he was afraid of anyone knowing he had that tape, but wanted the tape gone. There is no possible reason whatsoever for them to fight over it. They were there in the same room alone with the tape, they could have destroyed it together and both get exactly what they wanted. It means no sense for Hayden's character to kill the doctor because the doctor wanted the same goal as her, making sure that tape never got out. It's honestly so obviously a hole in the story, I can't imagine how no one cared enough to make the ending make sense. It's not just not believable, it's the exact opposite response anyone could ever imagine in this context. He's dead because they agreed on the topic? What's worse, they could have fixed this issue with the tiniest little change. If Hayden's character in the ending confession had said, "the doctor wouldn't give it to me because he said it was all he had left to remember the victim, and he can't let go of her, he loved her too much to lose the tape" the whole thing would have made sense. They don't have to change anything in the story or scenes or anything but a few words being different in the confession. It would have actually made sense for both characters, as opposed to the Doctor really having no reason for his choice, and Hayden's character's reaction would have made sense, compared to what was shown, which made no sense.

Imagine every single detail of this episode being the same, the only change at all is, instead of Hayden saying she shot the doctor because she went to see him to get the tape to make sure it never got out, and he wouldn't give it to her because he was afraid of the tape getting out; she says she shot the doctor because she went to seem him to get the tape back to make sure it never got out, and she says the doctor instead responded by saying no, BUT the reason he says no isn't that he totally agrees with her and the both of them want the same thing.

If he said no because he wanted to keep the tape, there would be a reason for Hayden's reaction. It fits better into both characters and the whole story. The doctor did very little to cover his tracks and seemed to care very little about the consequences of his actions, even leaving his wife and child to move to NYC to be with her. At every opportunity he picked the dumb illegal choice, all because he's that obsessed with the girl. So, it would better fit his character to want to keep the tape because he always puts his obsession for the victim ahead of any possible personal or legal consequences. Him suddenly picking the safer thing over the victim doesn't play into his character and is entirely opposite of the character. Like, it's crazy to me how this could have all been different by changing just one sentence. It could have been a great episode had it not been for this obvious issue of it not making any sense and ruining the ending.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed