IMDb > "Law & Order" Mother's Milk (2000) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
"Law & Order" Mother's Milk (2000)

« Prev | 217 of 456 Episodes | Next »

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 2 reviews in total 

3 out of 5 people found the following review useful:

What to do, what to do?

7/10
Author: Robert J. Maxwell (rmax304823@yahoo.com) from Deming, New Mexico, USA
3 October 2012

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Detectives Brisco and Green are called in to look at an empty apartment with blood on the floor and on a baby's crib. They track down the two parents, now living apart, but the baby remains missing. They discover it starved to death and buried in the back yard.

The charge against the young mother is manslaughter and the father is charged as an accomplice. It develops that the mother had given birth to a normal neonate some weeks before, has brought the infant home, and been neglectful. The baby cried all the time and the mother turned up the volume on the TV to drown it out. Little babies WILL be a pain in the neck sometimes.

The mother's defense counsel argues that the death was unintentional because the mother had been strongly advised by the hospital's lactation counselor that breast feeding was the proper way for the child to get nourishment. And, indeed, mother's milk passes on nutrients and antibodies that formulas lack. The parents had an abundance of commercial formula but didn't feed the child. In court, the lactation counselor sounds like a woman on a crusade, talking about "nipple confusion" and whatnot.

I don't know how many people recall what a serious issue this was during the 80s. The primary manufacturer of milk formulas was Nestles, a Swiss company, and there were outraged cries against it because bottle feeding was seen an artificial and unnatural. This episode touches on this sensitive issue.

I was auditing a class in Medical Anthropology in the years when this conflict was boiling, long before the release of this episode. The students were mostly women. I jokingly said I, too, was in favor of breast feeding because it placed the responsibility for feeding the baby back where it belonged -- on the mother. I was just trying to get a rise out of the other students but was unprepared for what came next, an immediate rustling sound followed by a tsunami of boos and hisses aimed in my direction.

Given that experience, as well as other impressions formed over time, this is a story about much more than mother's milk versus commercial formulas. It's about feminism. The mother may be the primary caretaker of the infant but the father should involve himself in all other responsibilities outside of breast feeding. The father has a responsibility too, and he must do more than work all day and slough household tasks onto his wife.

That, in any case, was the conclusion of the judge in this case. There's another issue that is touched upon, brought up but never explored. Are some couples simply unsuited for parenthood? How many parents, when faced with a baby who cries frequently, turn up the volume on the TV? Or worse? What is Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, anyway?

Was the above review useful to you?

Lactation, that's the name of the game

6/10
Author: bkoganbing from Buffalo, New York
1 March 2015

Jerry Orbach and Jesse Martin respond to an empty house with no parents and no baby which had been crying considerably. It all ends as one would expect with a dead baby buried in the father's parents backyard.

Leslie Hendrix's autopsy shows starvation. But not like the parents set out with malice aforethought to kill their newborn. For whatever reason the baby was not taking his mother's breast milk. Tessa Ghylin went to nutritionist Lee Brock who is a staunch advocate of exclusive breast feeding. But when the baby rejects mother's milk, what to do.

It is the position of the District Attorney that when all is said and done it is the mother that has the primary responsibility for care of the child. The father should have a hand in this as well which is why Michael C. Williams takes a plea and agrees to testify against his wife. He can as long as no privileged communication is divulged.

Angie Harmon prosecutes this one herself. She fought to have it that way. But she gets thrown a curve when defense attorney Donna Murphy requests for a bench trial before female judge Susan Blommaert. Fortunately the judge happened to be a woman. I know I would feel ill at ease were I a judge in this case with the issues involved.

As to how you might feel watch the episode and discover.

Was the above review useful to you?


Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Ratings Plot keywords
Main details Your user reviews Your vote history