31 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :- A Multifaceted Magnificence, 2 June 2006
Author:
eyedrop83 from United States
I knew this movie was extremely popular in South Korea, but I never had
a chance to watch it until today. And I am very glad to report that it
exceeded my already high expectations.
Not so many excellent movies draw my full attention from the beginning;
they tend to pull me in toward the climax. With this movie, I found
myself completely immersed after the first few minutes. Although the
theme of love, jealousy, and politics are commonplace (except the
subtle homosexuality which I don't believe plays too much role in this
movie), director Jun-Ik Lee magnificently put together the beautiful
Joseon dynasty Korea, euphonious dialogs, and some great acting. I
particularly liked that of the King (Jin-yeong Jeong) and Jang-sang
(Woo-seong Kam).
It made sense why the movie was so popular and why many people have
seen it more than once. It is a multifaceted masterpiece which can
appeal to multifarious crowds: it is a love story, a political drama, a
comedy, a tragedy, a musical, a historical gallery, and maybe more.
I believe the dialogs are straightforward enough to be translated well
into English, but non-Korean audiences may lose some great rhymes and
subtlety - especially those of the clowns as their dialogs are
downright colloquial and hilarious. Granted, I still believe everyone
will find the film enjoyable from at least one perspective.
21 out of 26 people found the following comment useful :- A beautiful and moving film that everyone should see, 19 June 2006
Author:
roobes-1 from United Kingdom
This is an amazing film, it has everything in it, the visuals are
beautiful, the soundtrack fits the film perfectly and the acting is
amazing! i was so struck by this film and it was so emotionally charged
it brought tears to my eyes. This film has no big name actors but it's
appeal is it's simple universal storyline, the subtle yet powerful
relationship between Gong-gil and Jaeng-sang. Even though this film has
no big name actors in it, watch out for Lee jun ki who is amazing in
this film he was partly the reason this film did so well, you will love
him after watching this film ^^
don't be scared off by the homosexual theme, there are no sex scenes
and all the homosexuality is implied.
all in all I CANNOT RECOMMEND THIS FILM ENOUGH!
22 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :- must see!!, 27 January 2006
Author:
gingins from South Korea
anyone anywhere that gets the opportunity to see this movie on the big
screen must absolutely do so!! as a Korean i'm quite critical about
films from my home country. i personally think this is another movie my
country's created that will live up to international standards and
expectations. it has made me prouder to be a Korean. i won't say
anything about the storyline except that it was a new perspective in
looking at the Korean history of that era, and has brought a new
dimension to productions based on Korean history. the acting, sound,
costume and of course story all fit together like a beautiful jigsaw
puzzle made complete. i'm just worried the incredible script won't be
translated properly across to the world.
people everywhere, please watch this movie if you get the chance to.
you won't regret it. i've already seen it four times on the big screen.
now i'm just waiting for the DVD to come out (i hear they're going to
release the full 4 hour version)
19 out of 25 people found the following comment useful :- The King and the Clown, AKA, King of Man, 2 September 2006
Author:
baak_gwai from San Francisco, CA, United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
I agree with every comment user "ngc891" said in their review. But
would like to ad a bit of a Western view of this film.
1. This film has done remarkably well in Korea despite the taboo nature
of the film. I though do feel that a lot of Koreans have not really
grasped the full intent of this film. Homosexuality has only recently
gained some acceptance in South Korean society, with its strict
Confucian traditions and strong Catholic Church. In April 2004, the
government removed homosexuality from a list of "socially unacceptable
sexual acts." Still today (I am there quite often, half of my year is
spent in North East Asia), the elders still see homosexuality as a
myth, something that is sometimes talked about, but definitely does not
exist.
2. This film's main plot line is about two men who are deeply love each
other (passionately, not fraternally) but do not know how to express it
outwardly to each other, so they stay content on their friendship. The
leader of the pack of jesters, Jang-sang, is desperately in love with
Gong-gil. The troupe heads to Seoul to be the best pack of jesters in
Korea. They soon land upon the stage of King Yeonsan who is amused by
their performance (which portrayed the likeness of the king in a
negative manner). The king falls is infatuated with the very effeminate
Gong-gil (by the way, in Western eyes, Korean men may seem effeminate,
but that is not the case, they are just very comfortable with their
sexuality and do not feel it necessary to put on a macho front as
Westerners sometimes do). The King and Gong-gil engage in what one
would consider an affair, although it was not a concealed one, very
public in fact. This of course enrages the queen and she sets out to
destroy Gong-gil and the troupe. You can see the worry and that
remaining spark of love in Jang-sang's eyes as he sees the love of his
life drifting away. And the eyes have it as one looses his sight; then
the other comes back to seal their timely death, together. End scene
with the troupe traveling to a new destination or was it them traveling
to an old destination, it is up to your idea.
3. I have read a set of omnibus collections at the Seoul National
University Library on the history of the Korean Dynasties. King Yeonsan
has the shortest entry of any king in the history of these Dynasties.
He was a selfless man who did not do for his people, but did for for
him. The King harbors mixed feelings of love and hatred towards his
late father King Seonjong for killing his mother as a result of rivalry
among his concubines. He also killed members of his ministry for
publicly detesting his lack of ruling for the people.
I hope that this write up does not offend either a Korean or a
Westerner, but this is the way I looked at this film from my Western
eyes and felt with my Eastern heart.
P.S. This is the first user comment I ever submitted to IMDb.com.
16 out of 25 people found the following comment useful :- Name in English, 5 March 2006
Author:
Burt-11 from Korea (Republic of)
Well I had seen commentary about this one several weeks ago and got to
see it last night. It was actually so good that the action alone could
carry most of the story since I did not understand the dialog. Now
although the name translates directly as 'The King's Man' the English
title being used for it is the "King and the Clown". This is why I had
such a hard time finding it on this site, so the administrators might
want to add this other title. It is based on a true story. Also the
historical representation (should be somewhere around the year 1506
since this is the end of King Yeonsan of the Joseon Dynasty's reign) or
staging and costumes was absolutely magnificent, not to mention some
very good acting.
18 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :- A Nutshell Review: King and the Clown, 15 June 2006
Author:
DICK STEEL from Singapore
King and the Clown was South Korea's best selling film of 2005, having
sold more than 12 million tickets over a span of 7 weeks. But after
watching it, it's difficult to fathom the craze, nor about the New York
Times hype that it "may be the equivalent of 'Brokeback Mountain'". Not
that it is a bad movie, it is actually entertaining and tells an
intriguing story in the courts of the Korean emperor.
Perhaps anything to do with the gay theme will suffer inevitably
comparisons to Lee Ang's acclaimed Brokeback Mountain. But somehow, the
way this film developed, I saw it in a different light - a story
between two male best friends, even though one of them might look and
behave more effeminately than even some girls do. Instead of jumping to
the straight conclusion that both the protagonists are gay, why can't
it be a platonic relationship, and that the more effeminate one had
chosen what he had to do, i.e. sell backside, because being poor
minstrels, they cannot afford to put food on the table? Literally
capitalizing on his looks, to bring back the dough. Sure his friend
might not like the idea, and it could be interpreted as either being
jealous (as a lover), or disapproving (as a friend). Then again,
because of culture, this movie might have decided to be more subtle
about the theme. Ambiguous to say the least, but it makes for
interesting debate if you watch this with a friend.
Two friends, Jang-seng (Kam Woo-sung) and Gong-gil (Lee Joon-ki), are
impoverished street performers who dream of having their entertaining
performances reap rewards they should be getting. They come up with a
wildly popular and bawdy performance poking fun at the emperor and his
consort, and it's not long before they get arrested, only to have
Jang-seng proposition a dare, that if the King doesn't laugh at their
skit, they can be put to death.
As fate would have it, their jittery performance brought on a
favourable response from the tyrannical King (Jung Jin-young). Having
now become official court jesters, their subsequent plays, whose
content they obtain from coffee-shop talk of those days, about the
royal family and other court scandals, serve as suggestive fuel for the
King to break free from his constrictive shackles, and take some
serious action according to his whims. But dictator attitudes aside, he
casts a lustful eye at Gong-gil, and turns almost childlike when in his
presence, in private. The most powerful man in the kingdom, reduced to
a vulnerable kid in the presence of a lowly minstrel. What ensues is an
interesting look at the relationship dynamics amongst the three men,
and with the people around them.
Set during the Chosun Dynasty, King and the Clown has some of the most
gorgeous sets bringing to life an era long gone, and beautiful costumes
that drown the movie in a myriad of colours. The songs are also fairly
pleasing to the ears, and the skits, I believe, are likely to be many
times more enjoyable if you understand Korean, instead of having to
rely on subtitles.
The movie also makes discreet jibes at those in power, and their
ability, or inability, to accept satires about themselves. It is always
easy for men in power to dismiss harshly the satires and their
creators, but it takes a lot more to be able to look past the comic and
understand the issues made fun of. There are brief scenes at courtroom
politicking and on corruption, but these scenes are too short to leave
any lasting impression or distract the audience.
The cast is a delight to watch as they carry their roles with aplomb.
The chemistry between the 3 main leads was almost perfect, especially
Jung Jin-young as the temperamental King - childish at times, serious
at others, and the androgynous looking Lee Joon-ki truly owned the role
of Gong-gil, that even as a guy, I thought he was beautiful to look at
(*ahem*).
All in all, King and the Clown is a story of friendship, how good
friends fend for each other, how, despite shortcomings and
misunderstandings, the best medicine is always laughter, and it's the
strength of the bonds between men that can ultimately stand up against
fear and overcome any adversary. If only the opening didn't spoil the
entire movie.
7 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- Heart-wrenchingly perfect movie., 30 September 2006
Author:
Tehranu from Philippines
This is one of the most powerful Korean movies that I've seen in my
entire life. The story of The King and the Clown, (왕의
남자) is an artful tale of entertainers that dare to mock
the King, and then are brought to the palace. Though well-known for the
gay-themes that the movie brings, it is only implied, and not the sole
purpose of the story. It deals with corruption in the high court, the
art of entertainment and survival.
Although the script, cinematography and etc. are done masterfully to
successfully bring the audience back to the Joseon Dynasty in which our
story is set, its main attractions are the characters that are
beautifully portrayed by actors Kam Woo-Seong, Jeong Jin-Yeoung and,
last but Definitely not least, Lee Jun Ki. Jeong Jin-Yeoung plays the
slightly deranged tyrannical King, scarred from his mother's early
suicide forced upon by his court ministers, who later becomes obsessed
with one his new entertainers, Gong-gil (Lee Jun Ki). Kam Woo-Seong,
who plays Jangseng, the leader of the troop, managed to win a DaeJong
award (equivalent to an Oscar) for his role, while Lee Jun Ki, for his
brilliant acting that brought tears to his audiences, as well as his
beauty that surpasses most girls, became an instant (and extremely
popular) success.
I highly recommend watching this film. The end brings the audiences
heart-rending tears, and empty wallets from watching it about 20 times.
It is that. good.
15 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :- Interesting movie, 24 January 2006
Author:
ngc891 from South Korea
This movie is really popular in South Korea these days. Why ? It's not
exactly a blockbuster, there is no impressive special effects. In my
opinion, the two strong points of this movie are the historical
background and the fictional story over it.
This movie takes place during the reign of king Yeonsan (1476-1506) of
the Joseon dynasty. King Yeongsan was not exactly a quiet man and is
well known for being despotic and cruel. It is believed that he had
serious psychological problems. A part of his life, as a Joseon king,
is well depicted in "Wang-ui namja". This movie gives opportunity to
understand a bit the private life of a king during this time,
especially concerning entertainment.
The story starts following two clowns during their every day life. One
of them looks like a woman but is actually a man. He will be in the
center of major events. Questions about social position, sexuality and
private life are issued. This make an interesting story although not
revolutionary.
The relationship between people are quite well shown. There is some
funny parts (maybe too easy) but it's obviously not a story for
children. Acting is OK but the movie seems sometimes a bit longer, due
to long monologue (very korean way) and some parts could have been
skipped.
Anyway, it's a nice movie to watch and I recommend it for people
curious about the korean tradition and culture under the Joseon
dynasty.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- An Unexpectedly Well Crafted, Groundbreaking Tragicomedy, 12 October 2006
Author:
juliacha from Vancouver
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
"The King and the Clown" is perhaps going to be looked back in twenty
years and be honored for its groundbreaking artistry. Its well crafted
narration, fantastic lines, beat / timing, verisimilitude, and
breathtaking cinematography, breaks all conventions of what is known as
Korean Cinema. Unlike many successful Korean films, it stays away from
patriotism, excessive special effects, and story lines that are far
from the country's true identity. It truly represents the Golden Age of
film to the likes of what Kurosawa and Mizoguchi meant for Japanese and
world of cinema. Simply it is the most truthful, unpretentious
exhibition that Korea has made to the world about what the country is
truly about.
Distant from the present and free from "Conglish" and other cues of
Americanized society, it is a story about people of the lowest class of
all, the street jesters of Chosun Dynasty, who are now considered to be
living national treasures by the Korean government. These are the
people who know the traditional dances, music, games, and embody the
spirit of traditional Korean culture before the massive overtake of
Americanization. This film is as educational to contemporary Korean
generation as to the rest of the world because it is a tradition that
is almost completely lost.
This film was a huge hit in Korea despite the blatant nature of
homosexuality as one of the elements of the story. This is achieved
because breaking the taboo is not the focus of the film. The audience
is made to focus on the hardship of low class, social differences, and
the psychological world of the characters, regardless of their class or
sexual orientation. The film treats all characters as just "people."
All characters' sufferings intermingle as the clowns become a part of
the court, and the film is especially made rich when the antagonist
King, who is the embodiment of all the high class' rights and
practices, is also treated as a round character. Despite his tyranny,
he is represented as a broken soul who is a product of the brutal
politics of the court's high class figures.
This film is a definite must see for all art film lovers.
8 out of 11 people found the following comment useful :- Nice, 28 July 2006
Author:
stract from -
Trust South Korea to produce nice tragedies again and again. First it
was "Friend", then "Joint Security Area", and now "The King and the
Clown", which is about two male clowns being arrested for staging a
comedy which mocks the King, and would be spared the death sentence if
they could humor the King as much as they did to the civilians. This
sounds a little like "Brokeback Mountain" taking place in Korea, but
the speech and behavior the two clowns have towards each other is
carefully crafted that they make it look more like a case of
brotherhood amongst them. However, that does not in any way dilutes the
affections we see between the two male friends, which are incredibly
genuine. It is this genuine affection that makes this such a touching
show to watch. Also, this is not just romance; this has elements of a
thriller and social commentary interwoven within the plot. And all
these roll out just nicely and rightly paced. No wonder it becomes one
of the biggest selling movies in Korea, despite its modest production
cost.
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Wang-ui namja (2005) More at IMDbPro »
31 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :-

A Multifaceted Magnificence, 2 June 2006
Author: eyedrop83 from United States
I knew this movie was extremely popular in South Korea, but I never had a chance to watch it until today. And I am very glad to report that it exceeded my already high expectations.
Not so many excellent movies draw my full attention from the beginning; they tend to pull me in toward the climax. With this movie, I found myself completely immersed after the first few minutes. Although the theme of love, jealousy, and politics are commonplace (except the subtle homosexuality which I don't believe plays too much role in this movie), director Jun-Ik Lee magnificently put together the beautiful Joseon dynasty Korea, euphonious dialogs, and some great acting. I particularly liked that of the King (Jin-yeong Jeong) and Jang-sang (Woo-seong Kam).
It made sense why the movie was so popular and why many people have seen it more than once. It is a multifaceted masterpiece which can appeal to multifarious crowds: it is a love story, a political drama, a comedy, a tragedy, a musical, a historical gallery, and maybe more.
I believe the dialogs are straightforward enough to be translated well into English, but non-Korean audiences may lose some great rhymes and subtlety - especially those of the clowns as their dialogs are downright colloquial and hilarious. Granted, I still believe everyone will find the film enjoyable from at least one perspective.
21 out of 26 people found the following comment useful :-

A beautiful and moving film that everyone should see, 19 June 2006
Author: roobes-1 from United Kingdom
This is an amazing film, it has everything in it, the visuals are beautiful, the soundtrack fits the film perfectly and the acting is amazing! i was so struck by this film and it was so emotionally charged it brought tears to my eyes. This film has no big name actors but it's appeal is it's simple universal storyline, the subtle yet powerful relationship between Gong-gil and Jaeng-sang. Even though this film has no big name actors in it, watch out for Lee jun ki who is amazing in this film he was partly the reason this film did so well, you will love him after watching this film ^^
don't be scared off by the homosexual theme, there are no sex scenes and all the homosexuality is implied.
all in all I CANNOT RECOMMEND THIS FILM ENOUGH!
22 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :-

must see!!, 27 January 2006
Author: gingins from South Korea
anyone anywhere that gets the opportunity to see this movie on the big screen must absolutely do so!! as a Korean i'm quite critical about films from my home country. i personally think this is another movie my country's created that will live up to international standards and expectations. it has made me prouder to be a Korean. i won't say anything about the storyline except that it was a new perspective in looking at the Korean history of that era, and has brought a new dimension to productions based on Korean history. the acting, sound, costume and of course story all fit together like a beautiful jigsaw puzzle made complete. i'm just worried the incredible script won't be translated properly across to the world.
people everywhere, please watch this movie if you get the chance to. you won't regret it. i've already seen it four times on the big screen. now i'm just waiting for the DVD to come out (i hear they're going to release the full 4 hour version)
19 out of 25 people found the following comment useful :-

The King and the Clown, AKA, King of Man, 2 September 2006
Author: baak_gwai from San Francisco, CA, United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
I agree with every comment user "ngc891" said in their review. But would like to ad a bit of a Western view of this film.
1. This film has done remarkably well in Korea despite the taboo nature of the film. I though do feel that a lot of Koreans have not really grasped the full intent of this film. Homosexuality has only recently gained some acceptance in South Korean society, with its strict Confucian traditions and strong Catholic Church. In April 2004, the government removed homosexuality from a list of "socially unacceptable sexual acts." Still today (I am there quite often, half of my year is spent in North East Asia), the elders still see homosexuality as a myth, something that is sometimes talked about, but definitely does not exist.
2. This film's main plot line is about two men who are deeply love each other (passionately, not fraternally) but do not know how to express it outwardly to each other, so they stay content on their friendship. The leader of the pack of jesters, Jang-sang, is desperately in love with Gong-gil. The troupe heads to Seoul to be the best pack of jesters in Korea. They soon land upon the stage of King Yeonsan who is amused by their performance (which portrayed the likeness of the king in a negative manner). The king falls is infatuated with the very effeminate Gong-gil (by the way, in Western eyes, Korean men may seem effeminate, but that is not the case, they are just very comfortable with their sexuality and do not feel it necessary to put on a macho front as Westerners sometimes do). The King and Gong-gil engage in what one would consider an affair, although it was not a concealed one, very public in fact. This of course enrages the queen and she sets out to destroy Gong-gil and the troupe. You can see the worry and that remaining spark of love in Jang-sang's eyes as he sees the love of his life drifting away. And the eyes have it as one looses his sight; then the other comes back to seal their timely death, together. End scene with the troupe traveling to a new destination or was it them traveling to an old destination, it is up to your idea.
3. I have read a set of omnibus collections at the Seoul National University Library on the history of the Korean Dynasties. King Yeonsan has the shortest entry of any king in the history of these Dynasties. He was a selfless man who did not do for his people, but did for for him. The King harbors mixed feelings of love and hatred towards his late father King Seonjong for killing his mother as a result of rivalry among his concubines. He also killed members of his ministry for publicly detesting his lack of ruling for the people.
I hope that this write up does not offend either a Korean or a Westerner, but this is the way I looked at this film from my Western eyes and felt with my Eastern heart.
P.S. This is the first user comment I ever submitted to IMDb.com.
16 out of 25 people found the following comment useful :-

Name in English, 5 March 2006
Author: Burt-11 from Korea (Republic of)
Well I had seen commentary about this one several weeks ago and got to see it last night. It was actually so good that the action alone could carry most of the story since I did not understand the dialog. Now although the name translates directly as 'The King's Man' the English title being used for it is the "King and the Clown". This is why I had such a hard time finding it on this site, so the administrators might want to add this other title. It is based on a true story. Also the historical representation (should be somewhere around the year 1506 since this is the end of King Yeonsan of the Joseon Dynasty's reign) or staging and costumes was absolutely magnificent, not to mention some very good acting.
18 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :-

A Nutshell Review: King and the Clown, 15 June 2006
Author: DICK STEEL from Singapore
King and the Clown was South Korea's best selling film of 2005, having sold more than 12 million tickets over a span of 7 weeks. But after watching it, it's difficult to fathom the craze, nor about the New York Times hype that it "may be the equivalent of 'Brokeback Mountain'". Not that it is a bad movie, it is actually entertaining and tells an intriguing story in the courts of the Korean emperor.
Perhaps anything to do with the gay theme will suffer inevitably comparisons to Lee Ang's acclaimed Brokeback Mountain. But somehow, the way this film developed, I saw it in a different light - a story between two male best friends, even though one of them might look and behave more effeminately than even some girls do. Instead of jumping to the straight conclusion that both the protagonists are gay, why can't it be a platonic relationship, and that the more effeminate one had chosen what he had to do, i.e. sell backside, because being poor minstrels, they cannot afford to put food on the table? Literally capitalizing on his looks, to bring back the dough. Sure his friend might not like the idea, and it could be interpreted as either being jealous (as a lover), or disapproving (as a friend). Then again, because of culture, this movie might have decided to be more subtle about the theme. Ambiguous to say the least, but it makes for interesting debate if you watch this with a friend.
Two friends, Jang-seng (Kam Woo-sung) and Gong-gil (Lee Joon-ki), are impoverished street performers who dream of having their entertaining performances reap rewards they should be getting. They come up with a wildly popular and bawdy performance poking fun at the emperor and his consort, and it's not long before they get arrested, only to have Jang-seng proposition a dare, that if the King doesn't laugh at their skit, they can be put to death.
As fate would have it, their jittery performance brought on a favourable response from the tyrannical King (Jung Jin-young). Having now become official court jesters, their subsequent plays, whose content they obtain from coffee-shop talk of those days, about the royal family and other court scandals, serve as suggestive fuel for the King to break free from his constrictive shackles, and take some serious action according to his whims. But dictator attitudes aside, he casts a lustful eye at Gong-gil, and turns almost childlike when in his presence, in private. The most powerful man in the kingdom, reduced to a vulnerable kid in the presence of a lowly minstrel. What ensues is an interesting look at the relationship dynamics amongst the three men, and with the people around them.
Set during the Chosun Dynasty, King and the Clown has some of the most gorgeous sets bringing to life an era long gone, and beautiful costumes that drown the movie in a myriad of colours. The songs are also fairly pleasing to the ears, and the skits, I believe, are likely to be many times more enjoyable if you understand Korean, instead of having to rely on subtitles.
The movie also makes discreet jibes at those in power, and their ability, or inability, to accept satires about themselves. It is always easy for men in power to dismiss harshly the satires and their creators, but it takes a lot more to be able to look past the comic and understand the issues made fun of. There are brief scenes at courtroom politicking and on corruption, but these scenes are too short to leave any lasting impression or distract the audience.
The cast is a delight to watch as they carry their roles with aplomb. The chemistry between the 3 main leads was almost perfect, especially Jung Jin-young as the temperamental King - childish at times, serious at others, and the androgynous looking Lee Joon-ki truly owned the role of Gong-gil, that even as a guy, I thought he was beautiful to look at (*ahem*).
All in all, King and the Clown is a story of friendship, how good friends fend for each other, how, despite shortcomings and misunderstandings, the best medicine is always laughter, and it's the strength of the bonds between men that can ultimately stand up against fear and overcome any adversary. If only the opening didn't spoil the entire movie.
7 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-

Heart-wrenchingly perfect movie., 30 September 2006
Author: Tehranu from Philippines
This is one of the most powerful Korean movies that I've seen in my entire life. The story of The King and the Clown, (왕의 남자) is an artful tale of entertainers that dare to mock the King, and then are brought to the palace. Though well-known for the gay-themes that the movie brings, it is only implied, and not the sole purpose of the story. It deals with corruption in the high court, the art of entertainment and survival.
Although the script, cinematography and etc. are done masterfully to successfully bring the audience back to the Joseon Dynasty in which our story is set, its main attractions are the characters that are beautifully portrayed by actors Kam Woo-Seong, Jeong Jin-Yeoung and, last but Definitely not least, Lee Jun Ki. Jeong Jin-Yeoung plays the slightly deranged tyrannical King, scarred from his mother's early suicide forced upon by his court ministers, who later becomes obsessed with one his new entertainers, Gong-gil (Lee Jun Ki). Kam Woo-Seong, who plays Jangseng, the leader of the troop, managed to win a DaeJong award (equivalent to an Oscar) for his role, while Lee Jun Ki, for his brilliant acting that brought tears to his audiences, as well as his beauty that surpasses most girls, became an instant (and extremely popular) success.
I highly recommend watching this film. The end brings the audiences heart-rending tears, and empty wallets from watching it about 20 times. It is that. good.
15 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :-

Interesting movie, 24 January 2006
Author: ngc891 from South Korea
This movie is really popular in South Korea these days. Why ? It's not exactly a blockbuster, there is no impressive special effects. In my opinion, the two strong points of this movie are the historical background and the fictional story over it.
This movie takes place during the reign of king Yeonsan (1476-1506) of the Joseon dynasty. King Yeongsan was not exactly a quiet man and is well known for being despotic and cruel. It is believed that he had serious psychological problems. A part of his life, as a Joseon king, is well depicted in "Wang-ui namja". This movie gives opportunity to understand a bit the private life of a king during this time, especially concerning entertainment.
The story starts following two clowns during their every day life. One of them looks like a woman but is actually a man. He will be in the center of major events. Questions about social position, sexuality and private life are issued. This make an interesting story although not revolutionary.
The relationship between people are quite well shown. There is some funny parts (maybe too easy) but it's obviously not a story for children. Acting is OK but the movie seems sometimes a bit longer, due to long monologue (very korean way) and some parts could have been skipped.
Anyway, it's a nice movie to watch and I recommend it for people curious about the korean tradition and culture under the Joseon dynasty.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

An Unexpectedly Well Crafted, Groundbreaking Tragicomedy, 12 October 2006
Author: juliacha from Vancouver
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
"The King and the Clown" is perhaps going to be looked back in twenty years and be honored for its groundbreaking artistry. Its well crafted narration, fantastic lines, beat / timing, verisimilitude, and breathtaking cinematography, breaks all conventions of what is known as Korean Cinema. Unlike many successful Korean films, it stays away from patriotism, excessive special effects, and story lines that are far from the country's true identity. It truly represents the Golden Age of film to the likes of what Kurosawa and Mizoguchi meant for Japanese and world of cinema. Simply it is the most truthful, unpretentious exhibition that Korea has made to the world about what the country is truly about.
Distant from the present and free from "Conglish" and other cues of Americanized society, it is a story about people of the lowest class of all, the street jesters of Chosun Dynasty, who are now considered to be living national treasures by the Korean government. These are the people who know the traditional dances, music, games, and embody the spirit of traditional Korean culture before the massive overtake of Americanization. This film is as educational to contemporary Korean generation as to the rest of the world because it is a tradition that is almost completely lost.
This film was a huge hit in Korea despite the blatant nature of homosexuality as one of the elements of the story. This is achieved because breaking the taboo is not the focus of the film. The audience is made to focus on the hardship of low class, social differences, and the psychological world of the characters, regardless of their class or sexual orientation. The film treats all characters as just "people." All characters' sufferings intermingle as the clowns become a part of the court, and the film is especially made rich when the antagonist King, who is the embodiment of all the high class' rights and practices, is also treated as a round character. Despite his tyranny, he is represented as a broken soul who is a product of the brutal politics of the court's high class figures.
This film is a definite must see for all art film lovers.
8 out of 11 people found the following comment useful :-
Nice, 28 July 2006
Author: stract from -
Trust South Korea to produce nice tragedies again and again. First it was "Friend", then "Joint Security Area", and now "The King and the Clown", which is about two male clowns being arrested for staging a comedy which mocks the King, and would be spared the death sentence if they could humor the King as much as they did to the civilians. This sounds a little like "Brokeback Mountain" taking place in Korea, but the speech and behavior the two clowns have towards each other is carefully crafted that they make it look more like a case of brotherhood amongst them. However, that does not in any way dilutes the affections we see between the two male friends, which are incredibly genuine. It is this genuine affection that makes this such a touching show to watch. Also, this is not just romance; this has elements of a thriller and social commentary interwoven within the plot. And all these roll out just nicely and rightly paced. No wonder it becomes one of the biggest selling movies in Korea, despite its modest production cost.
Add another comment
Related Links