IMDb >
A Waste of Shame: The Mystery of Shakespeare and His Sonnets (2005) (TV)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsA Waste of Shame: The Mystery of Shakespeare and His Sonnets (2005) (TV) More at IMDbPro »
Overview
User Rating:
Contact:
View company contact information for A Waste of Shame: The Mystery of Shakespeare and His Sonnets on IMDbPro.Release Date:
6 May 2006 (USA) moreGenre:
DramaPlot:
A mystery in Shakespeare's sonnets is explored. | add synopsisUser Comments:
Not As Dense As It Seems moreCast
(Cast overview, first billed only) | Rupert Graves | ... | William Shakespeare |
| Tom Sturridge | ... | William Herbert |
| Indira Varma | ... | Lucie ("the Dark Lady") |
| Zoë Wanamaker | ... | Countess of Pembroke |
| Anna Chancellor | ... | Anne Hathaway |
 | Andrew Tiernan | ... | Ben Jonson |
| Nicky Henson | ... | John Shakespeare |
| Alan Williams | ... | George Wilkins |
 | Nicholas Rowe | ... | Richard Burbage |
| John Voce | ... | William Kemp |
 | Tom Hiddleston | ... | John Hall |
| Christopher Fairbank | ... | Physician |
| Ian Hughes | ... | Thomas Thorpe |
 | Clem Tibber | ... | Hamnet Shakespeare |
| Tom Mison | ... | Young Blood |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsCountry:
UKColor:
ColorAspect Ratio:
1.78 : 1 moreSound Mix:
StereoCertification:
USA:TV-14FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for A Waste of Shame: The Mystery of Shakespeare and His Sonnets (2005) (TV)Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| A Matter of Life and Death | Henry V | The Chronicle History of King Henry the Fift with His Battell Fought at Agincourt in France | The Angelic Conversation | Deathwatch |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | IMDb Drama section |
| IMDb UK section | Add this title to MyMovies |
From one of the lesser sonnets (129), this title "waste of shame" taken whole from the first line is used by the scriptwriter to strike a mildly disapproving tone with respect to Shakespeare's apparent sexual ambiguity, instead of making a more general statement in line with the sonnet's entire message. In other words, poor Will -- he just couldn't make up his mind whether he liked boys more than girls or vice versa. Now, the actual message of the sonnet is more like, poor all of us -- we all have this thing in us that makes us subject to losing our reason or good sense from time to time because of our erotic impulses. And if there is any ambiguity, it is a reflection of how different the before and after seem to us once we have acted on those impulses.
In either case, it is a somewhat depressing theme. The film does manage to demonstrate that there was much going in Shakespeare's time and place to be depressed about. Rupert Graves shows again how much he gets into this kind of stuff in a very convincing performance. The costumes and sets seem a bit Merchant-Ivory rather than dismal, but I cannot fault either the overall production or its historical setting. In that regard, it beats the fluffy Shakespeare In Love all to pieces.
The notion of romantic love was not much admired in 1603. It was regarded as we might regard some of the lesser mental illnesses today. So all those long, deep looks between the guys in this film might even have stirred laughs had they been performed in the old Globe.