MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 1,663 this week

Exorcism: The Possession of Gail Bowers (2006)

 -  Horror  -  31 January 2006 (USA)
2.7
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 2.7/10 from 723 users  
Reviews: 23 user | 14 critic

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1214 titles created 11 months ago
 
a list of 323 titles created 24 Jan 2012
 
a list of 250 titles created 30 Mar 2011
 
a list of 1188 titles created 06 Nov 2011
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Exorcism: The Possession of Gail Bowers (2006)

Exorcism: The Possession of Gail Bowers (2006) on IMDb 2.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Exorcism: The Possession of Gail Bowers.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
Erica Roby ...
Gail Bowers
...
Anne Pederson
...
Clark Pederson (as Brick Firestone)
...
Francie
David Shick ...
Dr. Richard Thornhill
...
Father Thomas Bates
...
Father Williams
Dean N. Arevalo ...
Father Fletcher
Shunquial Perpich ...
Julia (as Shawnie Murphy)
...
Dr. Alex Rosa (as Jimmy Rockport)
Kelly Swearingen ...
Margaret
Brian J. Garland ...
Father Vincenso
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Horror

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for strong sexual content including dialogue, violence/gore and language | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

31 January 2006 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Egzorcizam: Posednutost Gail Bovers  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Goofs

When Gail is being "pressed" by the spirit, she is wearing a white tee, then it transitions to a patterned pajama top. She wears the white tee the next night. See more »

Connections

References Frankenstein Reborn (2005) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A low budget movie that was not that bad at all
4 December 2006 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

I have probably seen every horror movie from excellent FX and totally stupid to low budget and actually good. Well, this is one of those low budget but and actually good. I have read many comments and a lot of complaints about the acting. No one is going to win an academy award, but the actors did a good job considering that the sound was probably not the best in the world and they were having to speak louder, which makes the acting not as good as it should be. I think if this movie had a descent budget it could have been actually really good. It was good considering the obstacles the actors had to go through and it was a good attempt to try to try a new idea.

All in all, I would definitely recommend this movie. The nudity was not as bad as in many soap operas I have seen and the talk was not near as bad as the Exorcist or any stupid male bonding movie. I have heard worse.


11 of 14 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Where are non-USA residents seeing this movie??? MrMyron
it should've been a comedy viciousdeath
Mr Rockstone, where did you see it. strain-1
Anyone actually like this movie? jeff-1250
HORRIBLE ACTING!! Singingariel
Awesome jessejames6969

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?