0 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :- Wasted opportunity, 25 July 2007
Author:
Framescourer from London, UK
A poor effort from Douglas Gordon. For me this does a number of things.
It shows up the easily neglected art of the sports coverage directors
that broadcast games on television. It highlights the potential for
charlatan artists simply filming anything in an unusual manner or
outside its usual context and slapping an 'art' label on it. Worst of
all though it squanders a wonderful opportunity to really explore the
opaque world of one of history's most introverted, inscrutable
sportsmen: this surely the purpose of the film, with its wistful,
resonant Mogwai score.
One exception to this is the wonderful sound design. Selim Azzazi's
team have worked a miracle, isolating individual noises and chat during
the game, weaving them into an ever-varied sonic kaleidoscope. Amazing.
The joy of watching a fine footballer is what he is able to do in
context. There is no context here, Zidane isolated in space, if not in
time (depite repeated subtitles concerning the suspension of 'real
time'). This might have worked - there are occasions where Zidane's
stony face in front of a crowd reacting to something off-screen has an
appeal. However Gordon does see fit to include TV footage to
contextualise key events - goals, cards - and consequently the
spellcasting is flawed. There is also no craftsmanship involved: we are
told that there are 17 cameras but variation relies on shifting focus.
Add to this a lack of decisiveness over whether to focus on Zidane's
feet - his art - or to cover the man, and I was left feeling none the
wiser as to what makes Zidane tick. I wish I'd simply seen the game on
Spanish TV. 3/10
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it atblockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Zidane, un portrait du 21e siècle (2006) More at IMDbPro »
0 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-

Wasted opportunity, 25 July 2007
Author: Framescourer from London, UK
A poor effort from Douglas Gordon. For me this does a number of things. It shows up the easily neglected art of the sports coverage directors that broadcast games on television. It highlights the potential for charlatan artists simply filming anything in an unusual manner or outside its usual context and slapping an 'art' label on it. Worst of all though it squanders a wonderful opportunity to really explore the opaque world of one of history's most introverted, inscrutable sportsmen: this surely the purpose of the film, with its wistful, resonant Mogwai score.
One exception to this is the wonderful sound design. Selim Azzazi's team have worked a miracle, isolating individual noises and chat during the game, weaving them into an ever-varied sonic kaleidoscope. Amazing.
The joy of watching a fine footballer is what he is able to do in context. There is no context here, Zidane isolated in space, if not in time (depite repeated subtitles concerning the suspension of 'real time'). This might have worked - there are occasions where Zidane's stony face in front of a crowd reacting to something off-screen has an appeal. However Gordon does see fit to include TV footage to contextualise key events - goals, cards - and consequently the spellcasting is flawed. There is also no craftsmanship involved: we are told that there are 17 cameras but variation relies on shifting focus. Add to this a lack of decisiveness over whether to focus on Zidane's feet - his art - or to cover the man, and I was left feeling none the wiser as to what makes Zidane tick. I wish I'd simply seen the game on Spanish TV. 3/10
30 comments in total
Add another comment
Related Links