Agatha Christie: Poirot: Season 10, Episode 4

Taken at the Flood (17 Dec. 2006)
"Agatha Christie's Poirot" Taken at the Flood (original title)

TV Episode  |   |  Drama, Mystery, Crime
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.4/10 from 732 users  
Reviews: 30 user | 2 critic

A young widow is left in sole possession of her late husband's fortune, and her brother refuses to share it with her in-laws - so they enlist Poirot to try to prove that the widow's missing first husband might not be dead after all.



(novel), (screenplay)
0Check in

Watch Now

From $8.99 on Amazon Instant Video

IMDb Picks: June

Visit our IMDb Picks section to see our recommendations of movies and TV shows coming out in June, brought to you by Swiffer.

Visit the IMDb Picks section

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 4829 titles
created 14 Jan 2012
a list of 4281 titles
created 06 Apr 2012
a list of 2399 titles
created 08 Mar 2013
a list of 153 titles
created 02 Sep 2013
a list of 34 titles
created 6 months ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Taken at the Flood (17 Dec 2006)

Taken at the Flood (17 Dec 2006) on IMDb 7.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Agatha Christie: Poirot.
« Previous Episode | 57 of 70 Episodes | Next Episode »


Episode cast overview, first billed only:
Adela Marchmont
Rowley Cloade
Rosaleen / Eileen
David Hunter
Lynn Marchmont
Frances Cloade
Claire Hackett ...
Beatrice Lippincott
'Aunt' Kathy Cloade
Nicholas Le Prevost ...
Major James Porter
Dr. Lionel Woodward
Elizabeth Spriggs ...
Mrs Leadbetter


Hercule Poirot finds himself trying to solve the mystery of the Cloade family. Rosaleen is the young widow of Gordon Cloade who was killed in a gas explosion in his London home. Rosaleen has inherited her late husband's substantial fortune and she and her brother David Hunter are refusing to share it with other members of Gordon Cloade's family. There have been persistent rumors that Rosaleen's first husband, an intrepid explorer, is still alive and as such would nullify her marriage to Gordon. What Poirot learns however is of a far greater deception that will alter everyone's perception of what they believe to their reality. Written by garykmcd

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Parents Guide:





Release Date:

17 December 2006 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


| (11 episodes)


Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


The title is from the words of Brutus in William Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar", which Poirot (in the novel) quotes: "There is a tide in the affairs of men which, taken at the flood, leads on to Fortune". (Poirot is explaining "it is very Shakespearian".) See more »


When Poirot is at the inn examining the murder scene, the "dead" body can be seen breathing. See more »


Lynn Marchmont: "You're very lucky," my family says. And I say to them, "Goodbye."
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

great fun!
19 November 2007 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

This is by far the best Poirot of late.

The fast-paced, complex plot and exciting cinematography make Taken a far more interesting film than preceding ones which were overly naturalistic and dialogue heavy. Who wants to hear the Hollow's Henrietta discuss what a complex person she is when action and interaction speak louder than words? The actors of Taken are well cast and the characters are great fun to watch. Also, the murder-hook followed by the long question-and-answer routine in many of the previous ones was too linear and formulaic, which makes you question why they were adapted from the book at all. This film mixes it up very nicely, there are no lulls or boring parts that last longer than a couple minutes. This is a film you can watch more than once.

The few changes that were made from the book are for the better, especially if you remember how disappointing the very end of the book was. My favorite things about this film is the dramatic flair of the characters and the camera movements as I stated above. A good director can make all the difference.

One minor thing that bothers me is that the home version of this film seems to be shortened. For one, the scene with Lynn and Rowley in the kitchen is missing.

3 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Ugh, the American accents gardnert73
Agatha Christie plots that wouldn't work in the present-day... sn939
OT: The Monogram Murders sn939
Was Curtain the best Poirot ever? djosephh
The Labours of Hercules..what did you think? djosephh
Have you ever correctly guessed the murderer? sweetiepumpkin
Discuss Taken at the Flood (2006) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: