"The Dark Side of Porn"
Debbie Does Dallas Uncovered (2005)

Director:

Francis Hanly

TV Series:

"The Dark Side of Porn" (2005)

Original Air Date:

27 April 2005 (Season 1, Episode 3)

Genre:

Documentary

Plot:

A look at the making of the film Debbie Does Dallas and the mystery surrounding Bambi Woods. |

Plot Keywords:

Porn Industry | Behind The Scenes | Character Name In Title | Porn | Pornographic Film

Cast

Bob Burge	...	Himself
Robert Burge	...	Himself (as Bob Burge)
Robin Byrd	...	Herself
Jim Clark	...	Himself - Interviewee
A.J. Cohen	...	Himself
Eric Edwards	...	Himself (as Rob Everett)
Dan Hanks	...	Himself
Francis Hanly	...	Narrator (voice)
Bill Kelly	...	Himself
Robert Kerman	...	Himself
Pat Livingstone	...	Himself (as Patrick Livingstone)
Herschel Savage	...	Himself (as Herschel Cohen)
Bambi Woods	...	Herself (archive footage)

Directed by
Francis Hanly

Produced by
Gareth Rees	....	producer

Cinematography by
Francis Hanly

Film Editing by
James Cooper

Sound Department
Tom Logan	....	dubbing mixer

Camera and Electrical Department
Martin Singleton	....	additional camera operator

Editorial Department
Paul Ingvarsson	....	on-line editor

Other crew
Linda Alexander	....	researcher
Bethan Arwel	....	researcher
Bill Borrows	....	script consultant
Ffion Davies	....	production coordinator
Janon Fisher	....	researcher

Thanks
Luke Ford	....	thanks
Bill Kelly	....	thanks
William Margold	....	thanks

Production Companies

• Boomerang
• Channel 4 Television Corporation

Distributors

• Channel 4 Television Corporation (2005) (UK) (TV)
• Sundance Channel Home Entertainment (2006) (USA) (DVD)

Other Companies

• ABC News  archive
• VCX  archive

Runtime:

47 min

Country:

UK

Language:

English

Color:

Color

Certification:

USA:TV-MA

Filming Locations:

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Company:

Boomerang

Quotes:

Bill Kelly: He suffered a heart attack and dropped dead on the spot. Lucky for us.

Movie Connections:

References "Hill Street Blues" (1981)

this film could use a lot more research

It is interesting how films like this tend to rely on rehashed information without, in my opinion, bringing real facts to light. The filming of the original DDD is assumed to have been filmed without the awareness of the faculty. Yet no interviews with any of the staff or faculty have ever been published except in newspaper accounts of the day. Filming in 35mm is not a secretive affair. Especially in that time period. There would have been a crew of at least 30 plus actors and catering and such. It would be interesting to know how this was done without permission on a high profile campus such as Prett. Was there a student or faculty conspiracy? The film itself is indeed recognized as important in its genre and deserves study. This film fails in providing us with any substance and instead relies on simple, unproven hearsay and tepid sensationalism to push out yet more useless information to add to the glut on the market. I was terribly disappointed with the film.