Down 13,291 this week

Automatons (2006)

Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.1/10 from 199 users   Metascore: 43/100
Reviews: 6 user | 18 critic | 7 from

A low-tech FX film about the horrors of war and robots.

0Check in

IMDb Picks: May

Visit our IMDb Picks section to see our recommendations of movies and TV shows coming out in May, sponsored by COVERGIRL.

Visit the IMDb Picks section

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 3562 titles
created 13 Sep 2012
a list of 323 titles
created 07 May 2013
list image
a list of 9449 titles
created 04 Jul 2013
a list of 6510 titles
created 22 Jul 2013
a list of 24 titles
created 29 Aug 2013

Related Items

Search for "Automatons" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Automatons (2006)

Automatons (2006) on IMDb 5.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Automatons.
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

A young female Japanese hacker returns to Tokyo for a short visit and is quickly caught up in a web of crime and violence by the city's most notorious hikikomori psychopath.

Director: Adario Strange
Stars: Rex Hayashi, Tsutomu Ishizuka, Kayoko Kawahara
Cyber Wars (2004)
Action | Drama | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.5/10 X  

In the near future in the Asian city-state Sintawan, everyone's identity is recorded in the vast CyberLink. The only way around this is using illegal simulated identity implants (sims). A ... See full summary »

Director: Jian Hong Kuo
Stars: Genevieve O'Reilly, Luoyong Wang, Kay Siu Lim
Action | Drama | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

In the year 2080, the world is connected by a massive computer network. Combiners have developed a process that allows them to merge the souls of human and machine/cyborg, wreaking havoc in... See full summary »

Director: Byung-chun Min
Stars: Ji-tae Yu, Jae-un Lee, Rin Seo
Bitter Feast (2010)
Comedy | Horror | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.3/10 X  

A celebrity chef exacts revenge on a food blogger who torpedoes his career.

Director: Joe Maggio
Stars: James Le Gros, Joshua Leonard, Amy Seimetz
Satanic (2006)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2.9/10 X  

After a car crash, the teenager Michelle has the face completely destroyed and amnesia. In the hospital, she is called Bride of Mummy due to the mask she needs to wear along her therapy. ... See full summary »

Director: Dan Golden
Stars: Annie Sorell, Jeffrey Combs, Angus Scrimm
Andromedia (1998)
Crime | Drama | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.9/10 X  

After her sudden death a teenage girl finds her father has uploaded her mind to computer form. With a rival corporation wishing to capture her the girl is uploaded to her boyfriend's laptop.

Director: Takashi Miike
Stars: Hiroko Shimabukuro, Eriko Imai, Takako Uehara
Automaton (2008)
Animation | Short | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

In the future, a planet in peril evolves to a mechanized existence, destroying the natural order. All life and beauty is recreated electronically and thrives on solar power, until the day ... See full summary »

Director: Brian Neil Hoff
Stars: Brian Neil Hoff, Ryken Zane
2033 (2009)
Adventure | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.1/10 X  

The year 2033 has arrived to Mexico City, re-baptised as Villaparaiso (Paradise City). The mechanical... See full synopsis »

Director: Francisco Laresgoiti
Stars: Raúl Méndez, Claudio Lafarga, Sandra Echeverría
No Telling (1991)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.3/10 X  
Director: Larry Fessenden
Stars: Miriam Healy-Louie, Stephen Ramsey, David Van Tieghem
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

Will was a vegetarian pacifist trying to forget his flesh eating past. But when the citizens of this small town pushed him too far, he went CanniBallistic!

Director: James Felix McKenney
Stars: Don Wood, Laura Sweeney, Winston Bramen
Comedy | Horror
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

A grave robber reflects on his life of crime.

Director: Glenn McQuaid
Stars: Dominic Monaghan, Ron Perlman, Larry Fessenden
Horror | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.6/10 X  

Pinocchio 964, lobotomised cyborg sex slave, is thrown out onto the street by his owners because of his inability to maintain an erection. He is befriended by a criminally insane, ... See full summary »

Director: Shozin Fukui
Stars: Haji Suzuki, Onn-chan, Kôji Ôtsubo


Credited cast:
Christine Spencer ...
The Girl
The Scientist
The Enemy Leader
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Jennifer Boutell ...
Enemy Commander
Noah DeFilippis ...
Soldier Robot
Shell Driver ...
Sick Enemy
Enemy Guard
Benjamin Forster ...
Enemy Segeant (as Benjamin Hugh Abel Forster)
Enemy Man-at-Arms
Jeremiah Kipp ...
Soldier Robot
Communications Captain
Laree Love ...
Warbots Mk 1 & 2
Daniel Mazikowski ...
Enemy Guard
James Felix McKenney ...
Companion Robot Voice (as Clifford Steele)
Jennifer Shag ...
Sick Enemy


A low-tech FX film about the horrors of war and robots.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


This is how humanity dies


Horror | Sci-Fi



Official Sites:



Release Date:

13 December 2006 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Death to the Automatons  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A childhood wish fulfilled, for better and worse
24 August 2008 | by See all my reviews

An insert that comes with the DVD of this movie contains a kind of preface by the director about how he came to make the movie and what he intended by it. It is the realization of an idea he formed at age four, of a kind of movie that did not exist. The idea was inspired by the watching of an old movie, only half understood and only half remembered, and by later watchings of other movies, only half seen for spotty television reception. The director spent his early life searching for the movies he had imagined, only to understand in the end that they never had existed. So he finally made one himself.

I understand and sympathize with his objective. Long ago I discovered that the movies one imagines or half-imagines often had more to them than the real thing. Movies--especially fantasy films--which I saw fuzzily and partially satisfied my imagination more thoroughly than when I saw them later, clearly and whole. My imagination had filled in the gaps. In my late childhood I discovered the magazines Famous Monsters of Filmland and Spacemen in their "classic" period, studded with black and white stills from old movies I would not have chances to see for years afterward. What I imagined of them and of the movie history that had generated them--and, as I wrongly extrapolated, others like them--was different, and more, than what they turned out to be.

So I understand why the director would want to realize what he had imagined to exist and which did not. Also why he would want to make a movie from what his own imagination had summoned up, which had excited him more than any near counterpart he ever found in the real world. This movie looks exactly like an attempt--a successful one--to recapture the wonder engendered by a child's viewing of two or three minutes of an old robot movie--Gog, maybe--only half visible because of bad reception, until the signal gave out altogether and the screen went tragically white. The child, still hungry, retained a keen sense of what he had lost--and it is as if now, as a grown-up, he has re-created it in this movie.

The director's field of interest is therefore very narrow; he as much as says so in his preface. But within its limits--which amount to two or three scenes, or impressions of scenes--he has a great eye for composition and for the play of black and white, and is able to work up endless variations of them, which hold the eye and make the movie watchable.

But still, there are those limits. The director has no interest in what is dramatic--which is a benefit in one way, because it is true to fantasy as children receive it in movies, oblivious to screen writing conventions which they have no interest in, and which usually obtrude on what makes the movie worth seeing to them. However, they do like stories, and there is no story in the movie, either. Most of the action consists of a young woman puttering around in a laboratory, with robots (extras in robot suits) which occasionally go haywire and have to be shut off, and an old man on a TV screen recounting a future history of the world. There are also occasional interludes in which toy robots fight on a tabletop model of a barren plain. That, in essence, is the movie.

One might note that, in aiming to re-create and sustain the effect of a single type of childhood experience, the movie is equivalent to a piece of fetishistic pornography. It seeks to recapture and extend one emotional moment--and, once having done so, that is all it can do. It is stuck in the moment. It cannot expand on it, or grow beyond it. It cannot move on.

Also, the movie is not skillful, but perhaps it was not intended to be. Certainly much of its ineptness must have been deliberate. When people are speaking on TV, their lips are out of synch with the sound; the shots of the outside plain are streaked and spotted, like bad TV reception; most of the close-ups are out of focus, and the inserts do not match the long shots. Glitches like these seem designed to help create the atmosphere of a low-budget movie. But I wonder if that is not partly camouflage, since some of the raggedness does not aid in the purpose. The lighting balance changes from shot to shot; and though the old man on the TV screen is a competent actor, the young woman in the lab is not, nor is the other (unless she is the same one) who appears on the screen occasionally to say Resistance is futile. I believe the badness of the performers was brought with them, and not part of the director's recollection; actors in old movies were bad differently.

Ultimately, however, the director has done something that did not need to be done. What he has created is something that did exist, after all--though he would not have known it at age four. In his preface he writes that the TV shows he used to watch included Doctor Who. But the early Whos never played in the U.S., and he would never have gotten to see them. In any case, it is one of those whose atmosphere and technique he has captured, with a fidelity all the more remarkable if it was accidental. This movie is just like the early Dalek and Cybermen stories, minus the narrative--and of course, minus the Doctor. If the director had been able to see them at the time, they would probably have satisfied his childhood wish. But they would also have prevented it from becoming a yearning, then a passion, and then a quest, and so in the end he might have been none the happier. This is how humanity _lives_.

7 of 11 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Don't be fooled jimanji99
dude someone write about this amazing movie tang0008
Discuss Automatons (2006) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: