| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 14 reviews in total |
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Worth A Shot, 11 November 2008
Author:
mansxu2 from United States
This movie was really cute. It made me laugh out loud at some of the hilarious and sometimes ridiculous events that happened to people. Even though some of the things that took place were really giving me that "yeah right" feeling, it still portrayed that "it could happen" feeling as well. The acting is good - even though it was a bit odd to watch some American actors pull of a British accent - and the story line is interesting and keeps you hooked just to see what happens next. It's neat to see how all of the characters are connected through the café and how it impacts their lives. I would definitely recommend this for a late night or rainy Saturday afternoon movie!
5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Neither fish nor flesh nor film, 26 January 2008
![]()
Author:
gloshpit from United Kingdom
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
When the opening scene had two 'stoned' kids explaining in clumsy
exposition just how stoned they were ("I am getting anxious! I am so
stoned!") I feared that this would be a waste of money, especially
given the quality of the trailers on the DVD. But although it's not
brilliant, it's actually quite watchable.
The first thing I stated when it had finished was this wasn't really a
movie per se, but more like an extended play for television. The style
is very much like a theatre piece with a series of dialogues and
subplots between sets of characters, leeching between groups at times.
The acting was competent and the accents were quite convincing in the
cases of Heigl and Suvari although no awards are likely to be won.
The problem I think many people will have is that it's marketed as a
"hilarious" comedy, when it's not. It's an observational piece and a
study in embarrassment, more along the same lines of The Office than
blatant out-and-out comedy. Although it does have wit to it, this is
not a comedic film and doesn't even *feel* like an actual film, so it's
liable to confuse people. I doubt if I'd watch it again, but it was
entertaining while it lasted and doesn't really deserve the lambasting
some of the comments have given it.
6 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Perfect with all its imperfections, 10 January 2008
Author:
Kali Kartheiser (Arien_Kartheiser) from NY
People compared this to Waiting, I beg to disagree, its most like "La
cena" than any other movie, has really funny bits, and shows us
different realities, and different relationships, and give us a lesson
on acceptance and love. The acting is not worth of an award but if you
have no further expectations, this movie is funny, witty and has this
weird -yet- sweet twist at the end. I saw it because of Callum Blue who
happens to be perfect as the tortured unfaithful boyfriend, you almost
believe his pain, but who takes the scene is Rozz Witt's grandmother,
she's just too funny for words. I thought that a movie with Mena Suvari
after America Beauty wouldn't be good at all but I really liked.
There are some pervy things that made me think, that someone's normal
is not the standard and that's good, otherwise life would be just
boring.
its perfect for those days with friends or for yourself when all you
need is to laugh at something that could happen to you.
14 out of 26 people found the following review useful:
Not Bad, 21 January 2007
Author:
clare-141 from Australia
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I randomly saw this DVD on the shelf of my local video shop and decided to give it a go I was surprised. It is a movie that is based in one crazy day at a hip coffee shop in England. The story lines revolves around all aspects of the café the patrons the bosses and the managers you not only get to see the inner-workings of the café and the workers but you get to see private and some times hilarious and touching lives of the patrons. There are some moments that you wonder where is this going but once you get into the flow of the movie you really get hooked. Worth seeing, if you have some spare time, sometimes though the English accent of M.S gets a bit annoying but she does pull it of well.
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Nice stage-like Brit comedy, 31 January 2013
![]()
Author:
rooprect from New York City
First of all, I have to come to the defence (spelled with a 'c') of the
actors' British accents. Unless your name is Henry Higgins, I don't
think you'll mind what you hear here. Now Keanu Reeves doing
Shakespeare or Julia Roberts doing Mary Reilly, THOSE are bad accents.
In "Caffeine" the two American fakers had me fooled enough to think
they were actual Brits.
Now on to the movie. Like many good Brit comedies, the overall plot
isn't as important as the witty criss-crossing of subplots. Like a
clever stage play, that and some good acting is all you need. The whole
story is set in a restaurant: the dining room, kitchen, and back
balcony. Basically it's "a day in the life" of a bunch of oddball
characters working and dining in a cafe.
The stories revolve mostly around romantic/sexual relationships and the
absurd situations they create. Like a good Shakespearean romp... or the
70s sitcom "Three's Company", all the mayhem is the result of
misunderstandings, awkwardness and overreactions. The film starts out
somewhat tame, but as it progresses and we get to know each character,
they seem to become increasingly insane. One of my fave segments was
the meek vegetarian girl who was subjected to an excruciating blind
date with a gun-toting macho man. By the time the movie is near its
end, anything goes.
If you like dialogue-driven films that feel like plays, such as "Death
at a Funeral" (original version 2007), "Le dîner de cons" (original
version 1998), "My Tiny Universe" (2004), "Deathtrap" (1982) or even
the classic "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf" (1966), I think this movie
will be worth your time.
8 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Be Caffeine Free, 16 May 2008
![]()
Author:
theprovinces-1 from United States
If screenwriter Dean Craig was a friend of yours you'd be quite hard
pressed to find something nice to say (because of course, you could
never tell him the truth, which is that Caffeine is a pretty awful
movie.
There is a reason why nearly everyone who's commented on the film makes
reference to the bad British accents put on by the American actors,
most notably Mena Suvari and Mark Pellegrino. What's truly frightening
is that the IMDb references the latter as an acting teacher and his
performance is the most over-the-top in a film full of forced
situations and performances. And this includes Callum Blue who, while
adorable, is playing his Mason from "Dead Like Me," which probably
would've fine if he'd been given better lines (and situations).
Surprisingly, the most spot-on accent is done by one of the
lesser-known actors, actor Mike Vogel (who Dean on "Grounded for
Life"). Katherine Heigl's accent is actually not bad (and certainly far
superior to Suvari's and Pellegrino's). Roz Witt's, too, is terrible.
It was quite smart of Breckin Meyer to just be American.
It's the film's weakest element -- the idea of insisting it be set in a
London restaurant, when it could be set anywhere, especially where the
weaker American actors could focus on their performances rather than a
wobbly accent. Repeatedly throwing in a "bloody," "shag," "knickers,"
"shat," or "fancy," just isn't enough to effectively establish this as
London.
From the opening scene, it's obvious that this was filmed in Los
Angeles. Every outdoor shot has the same two old-school Brit Taxi and
Double Decker bus passing back and forth. All three vehicles are
preserved like they've been borrowed from the Petersen (Car) Museum.
Ah, here's what you could say to Craig -- his actors are very
attractive.
5 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
A slight disappointment, 16 September 2007
![]()
Author:
Gordon-11 from Hong Kong
This film is about the chaotic events that happen in a day in a
medium-sized London cafe.
Many have compared this film to "Waiting". I think this film focuses
more on interpersonal relationships and emotional aspects following
shocking revelations. It could have been a great film exploring such
issues. However, the story is not so well written. There is too much
jumping about from one character to another, making it slightly hard to
follow, and decreases to coherence of the plot. It is not so much a
comedy, as there are few funny moments. If it was not marketed as a
comedy, then there would have been less disappointment.
2 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Dull as ditch water, 11 October 2007
![]()
Author:
two-robinsons from United Kingdom
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I'm still trying to work out how and indeed why this film was ever
made. When will filmmakers understand that scripts featuring a variety
of characters and hopefully a number of unifying themes are really
difficult to pull off? Caffeine doesn't even come close to getting it
right. To make matters worse as a comedy it is woefully unfunny to the
point of painful.
In a nutshell, we're given access to a day in the 'zany' lives of the
patrons and staff of the Black Cat Cafe. It's the usual stuff,
someone's boyfriend has been cheating on them, someone's grandmother
has gone doolally, someone else is waiting for a call from their agent,
someone is on the blind date from hell when her ex turns up, someone
else is revealed to be a transvestite. Someone turns out to be gay.
Each story line plays out like a small sketch and appears to belong to
a different film entirely as nothing seems to bind them together.
Characters are so undeveloped it's impossible to work up anything
approaching sympathy for them and their situations. Indeed characters
like Tom the waiter don't even appear to have a back story. The fact
it's set in London is incidental as apart from regular glimpses of the
odd double decker bus and black cab, it could be anywhere. Even Rachel
the owner of the cafe sounds northern.
Casting Katherine Heigel and Mena Suvari as Brits seems an odd decision
as neither one had box office when this film was released and their
attempts at the accent is woeful to say the least. Surely as London is
known to be a cosmopolitan city it would have made more sense for them
to be Americans? Sadly the basic idea is strong and in other hands
Caffeine could have ended up being and entertaining and thought
provoking rather than dull as ditch water.
0 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Humor can't rescue Caffeine from a bitter aftertaste, 21 February 2009
![]()
Author:
nats_always_write from United States
On first look, this movie seems appealing - the coffee house is
certainly a relatable setting, and the characters all have their
humorous moments of witty dialogue, however short-lived. But on the
long glance, and after 89 minutes, the overall performance leaves a
rather bitter aftertaste. Because, lets face it, the movie brings up
nearly every socially awkward situation possible in a way that tries to
make light of it all, but doesn't quite get away with it. The mentally
ill grandmother who brings a shotgun into the café and then timidly
asks for a cup of tea, the dumped boyfriend yelling "I have cancer" in
order to avoid a beating, the lawyer who wears his fiancé's underwear
while cleaning, the gay waiter who breaks into tears, the threesome
with twins - it's a bit too much for this movie to carry. Maybe it's
movie's self-contained nature; like a play with one main set, I half
expected to see the cast of "Noises Off" to run across the screen.
Katherine Heigl's performance is a bit strange here too - while she did
give a better British accent than I expected she only shot off these
short little lines, as if the screenwriter was worried her accent
wouldn't last through a paragraph. Her comic timing is alright, but her
character is hardly developed, and since she is probably the film's
biggest draw right now, this seems unwise.
What is most unsettling is that this movie can't seem to decide what it
wants to be; a slice of neurotic 'real' life or a satire of the crazy
social situations that emerge when people get coffee-ed up? Are we
meant to like these characters despite their quirks - which are
basically unbelievable, because in what world would all this happen in
one coffee house in one day? - or think they're all nuts? But Caffeine
does attempt to wrap up the ending with the very odd grandmother
walking down the street with granddaughter Mena Suvari, declaring "That
was a nice day." I just hope all my days aren't that nice.
0 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Cool concept for a film but fails through bad direction., 8 June 2008
![]()
Author:
CindyH
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I'm not going to write a detailed synopsis of the film; you can get
that anywhere online. This "comment" is to illustrate what I think
about the movie, so you can better decide if you want to see it.
The idea is actually a good one and an alternative title such as, "A
Day in a Café," really describes it better. I like that it's all based
in one general location - similar to a play - and that it all occurs
within a short time period of one day. It's just about in real time. I
also like that almost everyone has a secret of some sort, that
eventually comes out.
One thing this movie does, that I think is really creative (though
isn't a new concept by any means), is it displays for us the mental
picture one gets as a secret is uncovered. To understand this, imagine
for a moment that your best male friend is wearing a dress and an old
lady's hat. That mental image in your mind is the same image that we
get to see through the character's eyes as they find out someone else's
secret.
It's all slapstick comedy to the extreme, so it's all in fun. One
reviewer here worried that all Americans would think all the English
really act like that. That's the silliest notion in the world.
Slapstick comedy is one of the oldest and best types of comedy and is
familiar to us all.
Now for the not-so-great parts.
I have no problems with Americans portraying the English and vice
versa, so long as its done well. Unfortunately for us though, it is
not. Both Katherine Heigl and Mike Vogel need to stick to American
roles. Imagine an American actor switching throughout the film between
both a regional southern American dialect and one from the Bronx. Can
you imagine such a horror? Well put that into British terms and this is
what you get from Vogel. I never could figure out what region he was
supposed to be from. There were even moments where he sounded Scottish!
Heigl on the other hand lapsed between American and British, making her
nationality questionable. Because of this, I kept expecting to find out
that being an American schizophrenic was her secret. I'm not saying
that their acting abilities were the problem, it was just their
linguistic abilities.
I've also no problems with boisterous comedy either, but the comedy in
this film was (for a lack of a better word) incongruent. The writing
was fine and the jokes worked some of the time, but the timing was off
or something. I don't believe that it was the actors or the writing at
fault, but the director. Whatever it was, it made it very uneven.
I was telling my husband about it this morning. The interesting thing
about this is that the movie came off funnier in my retelling of the
story, then it actually was. My 19-year-old daughter entered the room
to hear us laughing about the story. She asked what movie we were
talking about and my husband promptly replied, "She's been laughing
(very hard I might add), telling me about this movie that she
supposedly didn't like for the past twenty-five minutes." Indeed!
To sum it up; if you know in advance that it's crass, off-beat, has bad
timing and bad direction then you might actually enjoy it. Just keep in
mind that it is loaded with errors and don't have a high expectation.
Would I watch it again? Maybe, if nothing else is on. Would I buy it on
DVD? Absolutely not.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | External reviews |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |