"The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson" The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson: The Hunt for the Tiger (TV Episode 1980) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Hunt down a copy
hte-trasme8 November 2009
Viali Solomin has received a lot of praise from viewers of Igor Maslenikov's series of Sherlock Holmes films for Soviet television for his exceptionally good portrayal of Doctor Watson, and I think it's very well deserved. His acting is superb, as demonstrated by the fact that "The Hunt for the Tiger" is a Sherlock Holmes film that doesn't suffer by the fact that Sherlock Holmes doesn't appear for over half of its length.

Watson here is very believably an, intelligent, loyal man with the deep feelings of a creative writer and the drive to help others of a good doctor. This allows this excellent adaptation of Arthur Conan Doyle's "Adventure of the Empty House" (skillfully folded into a three-part serial with "Charles Augustus Milverton" and "The Final Problem") becomes not just a tense and suspenseful mystery and adventure story, but also a very human drama about Watson and Mrs. Hudson's loss of Holmes, and later, of course, their joy when he returns. When he does come back Vasili Livanov is excellent as always; I'm not sure I could imagine any other actor pulling of the unlikely scene of Sherlock Holmes crying as well.

The direction and pacing are as finely-tuned as ever, and everything seems to hit the right note, with the events of the previous two films being wrapped up nicely. Once again I applaud the filmmakers who could make Sherlock Holmes speak Russian, and be more believable than on most occasions when he speaks his original English.
21 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not as stromg as the other parts of the series
blumdeluxe21 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
"Priklyucheniya Sherloka Kholmsa i doktora Vatsona: Okhota na tigra" tells the story of Dr. Watson, who is the police's main suspect regarding the murder of a lord, while Sherlock Holmes is considered dead after his fight with Professor Moriarti at the Reichenbach falls.

In my opinion it is not as strong as the first two films of ths trilogy, mainly because there are less investigations going on and it more or less just seems like some of the loose ends are tried to be connected to round the trilogy up. Also, there are some weak points in the inner logic, for example I don't get why the police should suddenly believe Watson after this one scene, there is still no proof and it could as well all be just a clever trick. Still there is tremeandous acting and the atmosphere feels very much like a real Sherlock Holmes case.

All in all this is a solid adaption, delievering a high standard but missing out on some of the thrills that the other episodes were delivering. If you like Sherlock Holmes though, this is something you can have much fun with.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watson flies solo for half the show,
gridoon202423 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Then Holmes shows up, and there is a cameo by Moriarty at the very end. It's a handsome, well-cast production (except maybe for Inspector Lestade), but unbearably slow-moving (Holmes absence for half the show does not help matters), and unforgivably short on detection (in fact, there is none - Holmes already knows who did it, and how, and just sets a trap for him). ** out of 4.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed