MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 5,285 this week

McLibel (2005)

 -  Documentary  -  20 May 2005 (USA)
7.7
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.7/10 from 1,852 users   Metascore: 81/100
Reviews: 20 user | 15 critic | 4 from Metacritic.com

McLibel is the story of two ordinary people who humiliated McDonald's in the biggest corporate PR disaster in history.

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 30 titles
created 28 Aug 2011
 
a list of 41 titles
created 05 Apr 2013
 
list image
a list of 36 titles
created 10 months ago
 
a list of 42 titles
created 5 months ago
 
a list of 24 titles
created 1 week ago
 

Related Items

Search for "McLibel" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: McLibel (2005)

McLibel (2005) on IMDb 7.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of McLibel.
1 nomination. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

Spring 1936, a young unemployed communist, David, leaves his hometown Liverpool to join the fight against fascism in Spain. He joins an international group of Militia-men and women, the ... See full summary »

Director: Ken Loach
Stars: Ian Hart, Rosana Pastor, Icíar Bollaín
Kes (1969)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

A young, English working-class boy spends his free time caring for and training his pet falcon.

Director: Ken Loach
Stars: David Bradley, Brian Glover, Freddie Fletcher
Drama | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

A sympathetic look at Republicans in early 20th century Ireland, and two brothers who are torn apart by anti-Brit rebellion.

Director: Ken Loach
Stars: Cillian Murphy, Padraic Delaney, Liam Cunningham
Comedy | Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Narrowly avoiding jail, new dad Robbie vows to turn over a new leaf. A visit to a whisky distillery inspires him and his mates to seek a way out of their hopeless lives.

Director: Ken Loach
Stars: Paul Brannigan, John Henshaw, Roger Allam
Poor Cow (1967)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

A young woman lives a life filled with bad choices. She marries and has a child with an abusive thief at a young age who quickly ends up in prison. Left alone she takes up with his mate (... See full summary »

Director: Ken Loach
Stars: Terence Stamp, Carol White, John Bindon
September 11 (2002)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

The effects of the 9/11 terrorist attacks are told from different points of view around the world.

Directors: Youssef Chahine, Amos Gitai, and 9 more credits »
Stars: Maryam Karimi, Mohamad Dolati, Agelem Habibi
Jimmy's Hall (2014)
Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

Political activist Jimmy Gralton is deported from Ireland during the country's 'Red Scare' of the 1930s.

Director: Ken Loach
Stars: Barry Ward, Simone Kirby, Andrew Scott
Documentary | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

A future archivist looks at old footage from the year 2008 to understand why humankind failed to address climate change.

Director: Franny Armstrong
Stars: Pete Postlethwaite, Jeh Wadia, Alvin DuVernay
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  
Director: Ken Loach
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

A simple tale of a year in the life of a Gamekeeper. From the troubles involved in rearing the pheasants and dealing with predators (poachers and foxes). The gamekeeper shows us all the ... See full summary »

Director: Ken Loach
Stars: Phil Askham, Rita May, Andrew Grubb
Time to Go (1989)
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  

A plea for Britain to withdraw from Northern Ireland.

Director: Ken Loach
Stars: Bernadette Devlin, Michael Farrell, Emma Groves
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.6/10 X  
Director: Ken Loach
Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Helen Steel ...
Herself
Dave Morris ...
Himself
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Bruce Alexander ...
Anita Anand ...
Voiceover (voice)
Peter Armstrong ...
Voiceover (voice)
Chris Brierley ...
Voiceover (voice)
Rhona Cameron ...
Voiceover (voice)
T. Colin Campbell ...
Himself (as Professor Campbell)
Sue Dibb ...
Herself - The Food Commission
Pip Donaghy ...
Ian Flintoff ...
...
Dan Gallin ...
Himself - Intl Union of Food Workers
Stephen Gardner ...
Himself - Assistant Attorney General (as Stephen Gardener)
...
Himself (as Geoff Guiliano)
Edit

Storyline

McDonald's loved using the UK libel laws to suppress criticism. Major media organisations like the BBC and The Guardian crumbled and apologised. But then they sued gardener Helen Steel and postman Dave Morris. In the longest trial in English legal history, the "McLibel Two" represented themselves against McDonald's £10 million legal team. Every aspect of the corporation's business was cross-examined: from junk food and McJobs, to animal cruelty, environmental damage and advertising to children. Outside the courtroom, Dave brought up his young son alone and Helen supported herself working nights in a bar. McDonald's tried every trick in the book against them. Legal manoeuvres. A visit from Ronald McDonald. Top executives flying to London for secret settlement negotiations. Even spies. Seven years later, in February 2005, the marathon legal battle finally concluded at the European Court of Human Rights. And the result took everyone by surprise - especially the British Government. ... Written by Lizzie Gillet

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

mcdonald | corporation | trial | libel

Taglines:

The postman and the gardener who took on McDonald's

Genres:

Documentary

Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

20 May 2005 (USA)  »

Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$1,821 (USA) (10 June 2005)

Gross:

$4,337 (USA) (24 June 2005)
 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Originally released as a 52 film on TV and video in 1997; this extended 85 version came out in theaters in 2005 after the case had gone to the European Courts. See more »

Connections

Edited from McLibel: Two Worlds Collide (1998) See more »

Soundtracks

The Planets Suite
Written by Gustav Holst
Performed by the Glue Ear Symphony Orchestra
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Poorly-made, boring rant against McDonald's
4 July 2007 | by (San Antonio, TX) – See all my reviews

I would describe myself as an ultraliberal. I am certainly no fan of McDonald's. I never eat there, and I don't own any stock. The fact that a company like McDonald's exists makes me cringe.

Honestly, I feel this documentary was poorly made, and that most reasonable people who are truly interested in the famous McLibel trial would be better off reading about the McLibel trial than wasting time viewing this film. I feel that many viewers of this film feel that society would be a better place if more people watch this film and as a result are giving this unjustifiably good reviews. In truth, this is a really bad documentary. Even though it is less than 90 minutes long, it is extremely boring and frustratingly uninformative.

I feel the McLibel case made the McDonald's Corporation look pretty silly. I really wanted an informative documentary that was going to present the facts surrounding the trial and the events leading up to the trial, possibly make me laugh, and explain what exactly it is about British law that made this sort of lawsuit seem viable to the McDonald's lawyers. Instead, I was presented, for the most part, with an uninformed and naive, one-sided, boring rant against the McDonald's Corporation for its business practices, primarily from the point of view two unlikeable, self-righteous, and naive characters.

My first main complaint is that the title is a bit misleading. This is more a polemic against the McDonald's Corporation and its business practices than it is a documentary about the McLibel case per se. If the parts that weren't actually about the trial were cut out, I'd estimate this film would've been maybe about 30 minutes long. And there is hardly anything here about the pro-plaintiff British libel laws that made this kind of suit seem feasible for McDonald's to pursue in the first place (but only in the UK)--which really would have been the most interesting subject to talk about, in my view.

It is as if the filmmaker wanted some excuse to make a film to educate us all about how bad McDonald's is and viewed the McLibel trial as a perfect excuse. As if any reasonable viewer doesn't already know that McDonald's food tends to be unhealthy, or that McDonald's workers get paid very low wages, or that millions of chickens are slaughtered to make Chicken McNuggets! Who doesn't know this? Well, if you didn't already know it, you will have definitely learned it by the time this film is done, because it will have been repeatedly beaten into your brain, unless, of course, you fall asleep first.

My second main complaint is that the two principle characters, the defendants in the McLibel case, come off as self-righteous and just kind of silly, naive, twittering dingbats. For example, they and some other characters that talk in the film repeatedly express dismay at the notion that a multinational corporation such as McDonald's actually cares only about profits and not really about its workers or its consumers as people (except to the extent caring about us translates into profits of course). But these complaints are naive. You can't complain that vociferously about a multinational corporation wanting to maximize profits--their shareholders could sue them if they do anything less--the complaint needs to be directed more at the relevant law that allows and encourages this kind of corporate behavior, the people that support these laws, and, to some extent, at the consumers that support McDonald's and the workers that won't unionize and that accept such low wages. It's one thing to state the facts about McDonald's dispassionately and let the viewer decide for him- or herself whether to support McDonald's with his/her wallet, or to state the facts dispassionately and then go on to explain not only the situation the workers and consumers find themselves in relative to McDonald's, but also the situation that the McDonald's Corporation finds itself in relative to its stockholders, but it's another thing to one-sidedly skewer the McDonald's Corporation for the entire situation when the workers themselves, the consumers themselves, and the legal systems controlling the countries in which McDonald's operates and the people controlling those legal systems all share the blame.

My third main complaint is that the film is not well-organized. It's just kind of all over the place, and presented in a random haphazard manner.

My fourth and most important complaint is that the film is boring, thanks in no small part to the fact that the two main characters, the defendants in the McLibel case, are boring and unsympathetic characters.

The best documentaries are those that either neutrally present facts about events, or present the best of all sides of whatever issue is being discussed from the points of views of well-informed and intelligent people, and that do so in an interesting manner. That does not in any way describe this documentary. I give it a 2 out of 10, because there are actually some parts of this film here and there that do actually talk a bit about the trial, but, really, I feel that's a pretty generous rating.

If you want to be beaten over the head with an anti-McDonald's rant, see this film. If you want to learn about the McLibel trial, do yourself a favor and ignore the other reviewers and go read about it instead. It's a fascinating trial. This is a dumb film that tangentially touches on that fascinating trial to a small extent between rants about how evil McDonald's is.


11 of 34 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
um, what good things has mcdonalds ever done for anyone? kellypi
Theo Robertson from Isle Of Bute , Scotland Tsunami3G
'Poorly-made, boring rants,' and 'Ultraliberals' Catstello
Discuss McLibel (2005) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?